Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer

1.Introduction

The association between eating meat and the risk of developing health issues, including cancer and cardiovascular disease, is the focus of this report's rigors analysis. In a world where dietary decisions are extremely important, knowing the effects of eating meat is crucial for making wise choices (Mota et al., 2019). We will start by defining "meat" and discussing the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGHE), a resource that provides guidelines for eating meat and emphasises the nutritional value of meat as well as the significance of moderation and balance. We will also examine the state of meat consumption in Australia today, drawing on data from official publications like the Australian Dietary Guidelines from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and the National Health Survey from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The conclusions and debates will be compiled in the last section, which will also evaluate the recommendations made by the AGHE, the real-world situation in Australia, and the data from scientific studies.

2. Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGHE) recommendations

Meat: According to Folk (2017), the Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) defines meat as a broad category that encompasses animal flesh used for food. This includes the meat of aquatic animals like fish and other seafood as well as the muscle tissue of land animals like cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry.

AGHE Recommendations for Meat Consumption:

For Australian adults 19 years of age and older, the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGHE) offers dietary recommendations with the goal of encouraging balanced and healthful eating practises (Srour et al., 2019). Because of the variety of meat sources and varieties as well as their nutritional value, meat is categorised as a separate food group by the AGHE. The AGHE guidelines' special category for meat recognises the significance of this food group in fulfilling necessary nutrient requirements.

Reasons for Creating the Meat Category:

The recognition of meat's nutritional value and role in a well-balanced diet is the foundation for the AGHE's decision to establish a separate category for meat. High-quality protein, vital vitamins, and minerals can all be found in meat (Zhong et al., 2020). One of the best food sources of high-quality protein is meat, which offers the essential amino acids required for a number of physiological processes, such as tissue repair and muscle building. Heme iron is easily absorbed by the body and can be found in meat, particularly red meat. Consuming enough iron is essential to avoiding iron-deficiency anaemia. The main source of vitamin B12, which is essential for both the production of red blood cells and neurological function, is meat, especially animal-derived products (González et al., 2020). Vital elements like zinc and phosphorus, which are required for healthy bones and the immune system, are found in meat. Meat's high protein and fat content can enhance feelings of fullness and satiety, which may aid in controlling hunger and weight.

Serving Size:

According to the AGHE guidelines, a regular portion of meat is roughly 65 grammas of cooked lean meat. According to Zhong et al. (2020), 100–120 grammas of raw, uncooked lean meat equal to this serving size. A serving is usually defined as two slices or the equivalent for processed meats like sausages or deli meats.

Given its nutritional importance, the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating defines 'meat' broadly to include the flesh of various animals and products derived from them. Given the important protein, vitamins, and minerals that meat may offer, the special meat category in the AGHE recommendations was developed to help Australian adults achieve a balanced and healthy diet (Tong et al., 2019). The 65 grammas of cooked lean beef that is the recommended serving size highlights the need of choosing lean cuts and controlling portion sizes to promote general health and wellbeing.

3.Current situation

Australia's strong agricultural industry and cultural preferences have historically made meat consumption a key element of the country's traditional diet (Srour et al., 2019). Nonetheless, Australian adults' eating patterns of meat have changed significantly in the last several years. In order to present an accurate synopsis, two reliable sources—including official government reports—are taken into account:

National Health Survey - Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS):The National Health Survey is a regular programme run by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to evaluate the health and lifestyle choices of Australians. The most recent data, which is accessible as of the cut-off date in January 2022 to the best of my knowledge, shows some significant trends in meat consumption. ABS data shows that Australians have been gradually reducing their consumption of red meat (González et al., 2019). Roughly 63% of Australian adults reported eating red meat (beef, lamb, and veal) at least once a week in the 2017–2018 National Health Survey (Srour et al., 2019). The fact that this figure is lower than in previous years indicates a possible trend in the direction of more dietary options, maybe due to environmental and health issues.

Australian Dietary Guidelines - National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC):Dietary guidelines are developed by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of the Australian government. As part of a healthy eating plan, the Australian Dietary Guidelines encourage a balanced diet that includes lean meat, poultry, fish, and alternatives (Mota et al., 2019). Based on a careful analysis of the available scientific data, these recommendations provide a reliable source of nutritional advice. The guidelines acknowledge the need of including meat in the diet to get essential nutrients like protein, iron, and vitamin B12 (Tong et al., 2019). They also suggest staying with lean cuts and avoiding processed and fatty meats. This supports the widespread belief that consuming processed and fatty meats in excess can have negative health effects.

Weighing up the evidence

The six peer-reviewed journal papers that were chosen for evaluation offer a wide range of conclusions about the relationship between eating meat and the emergence of health issues, especially cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Literature summary table

Compare and contrast of evidence

1. Processed Meat Consumption: According to Wolk (2017), consuming 50g of processed beef on a daily basis was linked to higher risks of stroke, diabetes, colorectal and pancreatic cancer, and cardiovascular death. This suggests a possible connection between processed meat and unfavourable health consequences. In line with Wolk's findings, Zhong et al. (2020) also found a correlation between the consumption of processed beef and cardiovascular disease in a prospective cohort study. This implies that eating processed beef may raise your risk of heart disease.
2. Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease:After doing a scenario analysis, Mota et al. (2019) suggested consuming fewer than 65g per day to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer (CRC) in particular subpopulations. This supports the conclusions of Wolk by emphasising the possible hazards of eating meat, especially with regard to colorectal cancer and cardiovascular illness. On the other hand, vegans and fish eaters had reduced incidences of ischemic heart disease than meat eaters in a UK cohort, according to Tong et al. (2019). It's important to remember, too, that they also discovered greater rates of hemorrhagic stroke in vegetarians, pointing to a complicated association between various meat consumption patterns and stroke.
3. Red Meat and Fats from MeatIn a meta-analysis published in 2020, González et al. stressed the need of limiting fat intake from red meats and meat products in order to prevent cardiovascular disease and several malignancies, especially colon cancer. This implies that the type and quantity of meat consumed may have an impact on health outcomes. According to Srour et al. (2019), consuming more ultra-processed foods—which frequently include animal products—was linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular illnesses. This does not only apply to meat; it also draws attention to the possible health hazards that come with ultra-processed and processed foods, which often contain meat.

Contrasting Findings:

The research findings of the effects of various meat varieties on health outcomes were inconclusive. While some studies found links between eating red and processed meat and health concerns, others, including Tong et al. (2019), found differences in risk patterns depending on the demographic and kind of disease. Vegetarians, for instance, were more likely to experience hemorrhagic strokes but had lower rates of ischemic heart disease. The recommendations made by the studies also vary. While others, like Wolk (2017), emphasised the hazards associated with a particular amount of processed meat intake but did not offer precise dietary recommendations, Mota et al. (2019) proposed a daily limit on meat consumption to mitigate risks. González et al. (2020) highlighted the significance of staying away from fats found in red meats and meat products, suggesting that the kind of fat ingested with meat may have an impact on health outcomes. This research complicates the link between meat consumption and health.

In conclusion, the data from these research points to a possible link between eating meat, especially red and processed meat, and a higher chance of developing a number of illnesses, such as stroke, some types of cancer, and cardiovascular disease. The demographic under study, the type of meat, and the presence of other dietary components all have an impact on the association between meat consumption and health, therefore the results are not consistent. This emphasises the need of taking an individual's health and dietary habits into account when making dietary decisions and the necessity for a nuanced approach.

4.Conclusion

There is a potential associations between meat consumption and health issues, the literature also shows variations and complexities in these relationships. There may be links between eating meat and health problems, but the research also reveals that these connections are complex and variable. The AGHE guidelines offer a framework for including meat in a diet that is balanced, emphasising the value of choosing lean cuts and taking sustainability into account when doing so. Australia's current scenario shows a tendency towards less red meat consumption, which may have been impacted by environmental and health consciousness. The range of meat sources and their nutritional benefits should be taken into consideration when making educated dietary decisions, which should ultimately take into account the evidence that is currently available and each person's unique health needs. Moderate and balanced meat consumption can be a component of a healthy diet.

Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back! Exam Question Bank is your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects.

Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.

To connect with expert and ask your query click here Exam Question Bank