MKTG2001 Brand Management-Designing Effective Brand Elements Assessment
- Subject Code :
MKTG2001
Graded activity 3
(Module 4 – Designing Effective Brand Elements)Submit this activity on Blackboard by Teaching Week 4, Friday before 11.59 pm.Typeyouranswersinthe text boxesprovided.
Ifyouranswercontainsanyinformationthatisnotyourownidea(i.e.,iftheexampleisnotfroma personal experience with the brand), it should be referenced accordingly using the Chicago 17th Breferencingstyle-https://uniskills.library.curtin.edu.au/referencing/chicago17/introduction/)
- Read the article: “Google’s new logos are bad -https://tcrn.ch/3t2NYKZ”. Despite the overwhelming negative feedback that Google received on its newly designed suite of icons (Google workspace), Google stuck to its
- Why do you think Google chose to stick to its decision concerning the new icons? (50-100words)
- Do you think users today still have the same frustrations as they did when the change was firstimplemented? Why or why not? (50-100 words)
2.Read the article: “17 Rebranding failures and how much they cost - https://bit.ly/3i1kFSX”.
Identify at least TWO reasons on why brands discussed in the article have not enjoyed a successfultransitionfromthenewbrandelements theyhavecreated.(100-150words)
n?: Use what you have learnt about the “6 criteria for developing effective brand elements” to support your answer.
End-textReferenceList