MN5334 People & Organisation Assessment

Instructions: 

• Choose a multinational (MNE) firm that has a talent management programme/initiative. Drawing on HRM concepts, frameworks and theories you have studied in the course,  answer the following questions in your presentation:  

(1) Critically evaluate your chosen MNE talent management initiatives. 

(2) Now imagine you are an HR manager in the cooperate office of your chosen MNE. discuss the main external and internal factors that your MNE needs to consider in  implementing its global talent management strategies with an emerging economies subsidiary of your choice (highlight challenges and opportunities).  

• At the start of your presentation, you should provide background information about your  chosen MNE (for example in a table format).  
• This assessment requires engaging with both academic and non-academic materials (see  point below). 
• In terms of research and background reading you are recommended to take a three pronged approach: i) read existing IHRM academic literature on talent management (see  reading list below), ii) read academic literature on strategic talent management in  emerging markets, and iii) gather empirical data on your chosen MNE (see point below). 
• When gathering data on your chosen MNE you may draw on alternative (non-academic)  sources such as corporate/company websites, consultancy reports, market research  reports, newspaper articles (for example, the FT/Bloomberg /Newsweek/ Economist),  published interviews with executives and entrepreneurs, and industry reports. 
• Please keep your critical analysis focused on talent management policies and practices at all times.
• Throughout your presentation link your critical analysis and general theoretical  arguments to your chosen MNE. 
• Please offer higher quality, deeper critical analysis for a few issues (a maximum of 2-3 talent management issues are recommended) rather than discussing a lot of issues in not  enough detail.  
• You can choose to focus on any talent management issues either inspired by some of the  topics covered in our module (for example, talent attraction, talent section, retaining talent, developing talent, succession planning, employer branding, international  assignments etc.) or generated from your own reading of IHRM literature on talent  management.  
• Each presentation should last for a total of 10 minutes (you will be marked down for not  being able to finish your presentation in the given time). 
• Please note that the presentation should be in your own words and should reflect your  own understanding of the subject. Where material has been derived from another source,  this should be clearly indicated and the original source should be cited. If you directly  quote from an article, make this clear by using inverted commas or putting the quote in an  indented paragraph on its own. You must also give a reference to the source of the quote. 
• Please provide a detailed bibliography at the end of the presentation and provide as much  in-text referencing as possible. References are likely to be a mix of academic and  reputable media sources as well as relevant reports. 

Get your MN5334 People & Organisation assignment solved by our Organization Management Experts from Exam Question Bank . Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to all question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.