diff_months: 8

PSYC200 Annotated Bibliography

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2023-09-13 09:21:24
Order Code: CLT318875
Question Task Id: 0

Part A

Goncalves, F., & Mello, S. (2021). A Few Bad Apples? Racial Bias in Policing. The American Economic Review, 111(5), 1406–1441. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20181607

Goncalves and Mello (2021) investigated racial bias as a concern in law enforcement. They researched on prevailing prejudices. This study explored the possibility that law enforcement personnel's unconscious prejudices may be to blame for racial disparities in police outcomes. The authors took on this challenging problem using a thorough economic study. They also highlighted that the grave effects of racial bias in policing, a phenomenon that is generally acknowledged. The authors contended that even law enforcement officials with the best of intentions may unintentionally exhibit underlying prejudices when under pressure to make hasty judgements. These hidden prejudices can lead to unwarranted racial disparities in a variety of law enforcement practices, such as arrests, the use of force, and sentencing.

The authors studied massive dataset and conducted statistical analysis so that the presence and importance of unconscious bias can be understood. In order to make in-depth evaluation of racial biasness they also researched on different practices followed by police for instance stopping people in traffic, arresting suspected and using force. They uncovered strong proof that implicit biases have a considerable impact on police officers' decisions, causing inequities that disproportionately harm persons of colour.

This study's awareness of the intricacy of the problem was one of its standout features. Goncalves and Mello (2021) acknowledged that eliminating racial bias in law enforcement requires more than just pointing out a few "bad apples." Instead, they contended that implicit biases are a systemic issue that calls for deliberate policy changes and training initiatives.

The article by Goncalves and Mello made a significant contribution to the continuing discussion on racial bias in policing. Their study highlighted the necessity for an all-encompassing strategy to deal with this issue, one that includes both legislation changes and training programmes inside law enforcement organisations. This study challenged the society to address the more subtle, yet no less destructive, types of bias that continue to exist in our criminal justice system by highlighting the significance of implicit biases in policing. It acted as a rallying cry for decision-makers, law enforcement, and the general public to cooperate in creating a more just and equitable police system.

Rizzuto, T., Mitchell, T., Jackson, C., & Winchester, E. (2023). A Field Study of Racial Bias in Policing: Implications for Organizational Sciences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09809-z

Rizzuto et al. (2023) gave a thorough field study in their work that explores the problem of racial bias in policing with an emphasis on its implications for organisational sciences. This study significantly advanced our knowledge of racial bias in the legal system and in the larger organisational setting.

The authors began by recognising the pervasive issue of racial bias in policing and its significant societal effects. They emphasised the significance of approaching this problem from an organisational sciences viewpoint and stress the critical role that policing organisations play in affecting results and moulding officer behaviour. Rizzuto et al. (2023) thoroughly investigated the presence and effects of racial bias in various enforcement scenarios through their field study. To evaluate the impact of implicit biases on police officers' actions and interactions with the public, they used empirical research techniques, including data collecting and analysis. Their findings offered strong proof that implicit prejudices have a big impact on police behaviour and lead to racial discrimination.

This study's emphasised on the implications for organisational sciences is one of its most notable features. The authors contended that organisational culture, rules, and practices as well as individual officer attitudes have a role in the development of racial bias inside police organisations. The systemic character of the issue was highlighted by this broader viewpoint, which also highlights the requirement for reform in organisation

The research by Rizzuto et a. (2023) provided insightful information on the problem of racial bias in police and its effects on the field of organisational sciences. Their findings supported the notion that combating racial bias in law enforcement required a multidimensional strategy that takes into account not only the biases of specific officers but also the larger organisational structures that may either exacerbate or lessen such biases. This study asked for a structural overhaul of police organisations to advance fairness, equity, and accountability in policing practices by situating racial bias within the context of organisational sciences.

Atiba Goff, P., & Barsamian Kahn, K. (2012). Racial Bias in Policing: Why We Know Less Than We Should: Policing Racism. Social Issues and Policy Review, 6(1), 177–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01039.x

Atiba Goff and Barsamian Kahn (2012) explored the intricate subject of racial bias in policing in their research. They argued that there is a sizable knowledge gap in our understanding of this crucial subject and highlight the difficulties involved in appreciating the scope and effects of this bias.

They pointed out the ongoing issue of racial bias in policing and the negative effects it has on minority populations. They suggested that because racial bias in police frequently manifests itself in subtle, implicit ways, it is challenging to measure and research. They also asserted that the lack of comprehension of the problem is a result of its inherent intricacy.

Goff and Kahn (2012) focused on the frequently subtle and unconscious nature of racial bias as they examine the various facets of it in the context of police. They talked about how prejudices can show up in the choices made by law enforcement officials, influencing things like stops, searches, arrests, and the use of force. It wassignificant that the authors called the attention to the variety of elements that may cause racial disparities in police.

The analysis of the knowledge gaps that exist regarding racial bias in policing is one of its major contributions. Goff and Kahn (2012) believed that a number of issues, including insufficient data collecting, an unwillingness to accept bias, and the intricate interaction of socioeconomic and cultural impacts on policing practices, contribute to our limited understanding of this issue.

The research by Atiba Goff and Barsamian Kahn (2012) illuminated the complex difficulties involved in researching racial bias in policing. Their work emphasised how critical it was to recognise bias' frequently subtle nature and systemic effects. The authors called for scholars, policymakers, and society at large to address these issues and to establish a more complete and nuanced understanding of racial prejudice in police by critiquing the knowledge gaps that now exist. This piece was a call to action to fully address this critical problem and work towards a more just and equitable criminal justice system.

Part B

Introduction

Racial bias in police has long been a problem for law enforcement organisations all around the United States. Geographical, temporal, and demographic boundaries do not apply to this issue. In order to understand why this problem exists and, more significantly, how it may be effectively remedied, academics, researchers, and activists have gone deeply into its roots. Growing evidence suggests that many of the racial biases we observe in police may be the result of implicit biases. This discussion addresses the importance of implicit biases in law enforcement and looks at the tactics that agencies are trying to use to mitigate their negative effects.

Thesis Statement

Deeply ingrained preconceptions are known as implicit biases, which have an unconscious impact on people's beliefs and behaviour. These prejudices can lead to biased practices in police that disproportionately harm people of colour. Police agencies are increasingly aware of how urgent it is to make changes to policies and implement training initiatives to overcome these biases.

The Prevalence of Implicit Bias in Policing:

The complex world of law enforcement and reveals the unsettling truth that even well-meaning police officers can be influenced by unconscious biases when making split-second decisions under pressure.

Goncalves and Mello (2021) supported the idea that implicit biases are not always the product of overt racism or malevolent intent. Instead, because of societal and cultural effects, these prejudices are frequently inadvertent and deeply established in people. Officers in law enforcement frequently need to make snap decisions in life-or-death circumstances. During suchhigh-stress situations, implicit biases may unintentionally influence an officer's response, with unexpected and maybe fatal repercussions.

Opposition contended that police agencies can and need to conduct rigorous training programmes to provide officers the skills they need to identify and address unconscious prejudice. In addition, resolving racial inequities requires holding police responsible for their conduct, even if they were affected by unconscious biases. The focus on implicit prejudice, according to some opponents, risks drawing attention away from fundamental problems with policing, like racial profiling and discriminatory laws. Comprehensive reform is required because implicit prejudice might only be a small component of the overall issue.

Field Studies on Racial Bias in Policing:

As per Rizzuto et al. (2023) factual proof for the claim that unconscious biases are not just abstract concepts with no practical application. It supports the idea that these prejudices can lead to racially discriminating actions. The study's ability to show that implicit biases exist in numerous policing scenarios emphasises how widespread this problem is. Implicit biases tend to routinely have a large impact on a variety of actions, including traffic stops, searches, and the use of force.

While the study shows a connection between implicit biases and racial discriminatory practices, critics may claim that it does not prove causation. It's crucial to take into account additional potential contributing elements that could affect police behaviour. Some sceptics might argue that not all police agencies and personnel can be affected by the conclusions from a particular field research. Regional differences in policing practices make it risky to generalise conclusions and oversimplify the problem.

The Hidden Nature of Racial Bias:

The focus on the unconscious character of racial bias by Goff and Kahn (2012 )is consistent with studies in cognitive psychology, which shows that implicit biases function below the level of conscious awareness. This emphasises how challenging it is to recognise and admit these prejudices. Officers may not be aware that their decisions are influenced by implicit biases, which can have a significant impact on decision-making in law enforcement. This ignorance may result in unfair outcomes and discriminatory actions. Critics might contend that the focus on unconscious bias serves as a handy justification for people who want to downplay their involvement in discriminating practices. The argument by detractors is that identifying unconscious bias should not relieve people or institutions of their obligation to address and correct biased behaviour. Arguments in opposition might claim that although it may be difficult to identify subconscious prejudice, it is not impossible. Effective identification and mitigation of these biases can be achieved by individuals and organisations with the use of well-rounded training programmes and evaluation tools.

Discussion

Understanding Implicit Bias:

Unconscious associations that people form based on their race, gender, age, or other qualities are known as implicit biases. Even persons who sincerely believe they lack any such biases can develop biased attitudes and engage in discriminatory behaviour as a result of these biases. These prejudices can show themselves in police in a number of ways, such as disproportionate stops and searches of individuals of colour or the use of force in interactions.

Policy Modifications:

Police departments are updating their policies and procedures to prevent unconscious prejudice. These adjustments include updating the use-of-force policies, putting de-escalation training into place, and fostering community-focused policing. These changes are made to lessen conflicts that could be sparked by implicit bias.

Implicit bias training is being incorporated into many police forces' curricula. These initiatives seek to educate officers about unconscious biases and offer solutions for reducing their negative effects. However, there is continuous discussion regarding the efficacy of such training.

To ensure community engagement it is essential to build trust and confidence between community and law enforcement parties. In order to reduce the gap police officials are stressing more on programmes, which encourages community engagement. To deal with issues partnership, enhanced communication and reaching people is required.

Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back! Exam Question Bank is your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects.

Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.

To connect with expert and ask your query click here Exam Question Bank

  • Uploaded By : Mohit
  • Posted on : September 13th, 2023
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 72

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more