diff_months: 23

LAW10010 Introduction to Australian law and statutory interpretation

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2023-01-27 05:57:14
Order Code: CLT315017 (2)
Question Task Id: 0
  • Subject Code :

    LAW10010

  • Country :

    Australia

Question 1: What provisions of the Graffiti Prevention Act 2007, if any, may jay have contravened?

Using IRAC Method

ISSUE define issue clearly

Jay is a high school teacher employed by the local government who is passionate about promoting the use of renewable energy sources and fighting against climate change. A climate justice club at the school is run by jay and lauren, who is another teacher. They had encouraged and assisted the children in taking part in several school strikes for climate initiatives, as well as actively writing letters to local businesses and council members, and among other things. Following a recent meeting in their climate justice group, the students received news of one of their role models being sentenced to eight months in prison for her recent climate protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

Given that they are not legally permitted to vote and have no other means of speaking out, the students expressed that they felt discouraged about the continuing their protest. Jay decided to demonstrate to the pupils that they could express their opinions. He to make his way towards Melbournes St Pauls Cathedral after grabbing some chalk and two hairspray cans. It is significant to note that a mixture of chalk and hairspray can be diffuclt to remove from concrete and may even be permanent. However, he soon realised as he arrived that he had brought a spray paint can and a hairspray can.

Jay was thinking of things to write on the wall when two policemen came up to him. When questioned about what he was doing, he stated that he was simply trying to make a statement to show his students that they can still have their voices heard and he felt he had a responsibility to motivate his students. Jay, however, was told by the police to move on, otherwise, he would be charged with violating the Grafitti Prevention Act 2007.

The Graffiti Prevention Act of 2007 may have been invoked numerous times against Jay as a result of his desire to champion the usage of renewable energy sources and serve as an inspiration to his climate justice group at the local government high school where he teaches.

RULE- Identify and state the relevant law

Graffiti Prevention Act 2007

PART 1- PRELIMINARY

  • Graffiti implement means an implement of substance that is capable of being used to mark graffiti;
  • Graffiti offence means ---- (a) an offence against this Act
  • Mark Graffiti means write, draw, mark, scratch or otherwise deface property by any means so that the defacement is not readily removeable by wiping with a dry cloth;
  • Prescribed Graffiti implement means --- (a) an aerosol paint container

PART 2- OFFENCES

5 Marking graffiti

A person must not mark graffiti on property if the graffiti is visible from a public place unless the person has first obtained the express consent of the owner, or an agent of the owner, of the property to do so.

Penalty: Level 7 imprisonment

7 possessing a prescribed graffiti implement

  1. A person must not, without lawful excuse, posses a prescribed graffiti implement- (b) in an adjacent public placePenalty 25 penalty Units
  2. It is a lawful excuse for the purposes of subsection (1) that the person is in possession of a prescribed graffiti implement in the course of engaging in, or carrying out any functions in relation to, his or her employment, occupation, business, trade or profession 8 Possessing a graffiti implement with intent to mark graffiti

A person must not possess a graffiti implement with the intention of using it to contravene section 5 or 6Penalty 25 pentalty units.Apply the law to the facts, arguing both sides where appropriate.Put forward a conclusion and justify it.

Question 2: What provisions of the Graffiti Prevention Act 2007, if any, may lauren have contravened?

Get your LAW10010 Introduction to Australian law and statutory interpretation "statutory interpretation research " assignment solved by our Law Expertsfrom Exam Question Bank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution toall question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. Theres one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.


  • Uploaded By : Katthy Wills
  • Posted on : January 27th, 2023
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 263

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more