Personality Psychology Arrogant Personality Trait Assignment

Abstract

The concept of personality encompasses a range of attributes such as qualities, interests, values, self-concept, talents, and emotions. Conscientiousness has been identified as a crucial trait by personality psychologists, particularly in the context of higher education and its implications for individuals' future endeavours. This study aims to assess the levels of arrogance exhibited by two captains. The four-step process for conducting Random Access Memory (RAM) personality testing is used to investigate the impact of researcher characteristics, expertise, and personal qualities on the accuracy of the arrogant trait. A brief assessment tool is offered to measure the five-factor model of personality traits, which have the potential to impact various facets of our everyday routines. Funder (1995) developed the Realistic Accuracy Model (RAM) with a general and consequential assumption that distinguished it from other earlier models during the error paradigm, which had focused on neurotic and psychotic states of the mind as an error that required correction (Craig et al., 1993). The RAM was based on two assumptions: the first was that personality evaluation is a highly complex process that transcends operational definitions, and the second was that accurate personality evaluation requires both the subject's attributes and behaviours and observation.

Personality traits have the potential to serve as a means of characterising individuals and enabling psychologists to anticipate the levels of effectiveness, lifespan, and professional and recreational preferences. Six independent University of South Australia researchers conducted research on personality psychology by watching two video clips from "Star Trek - Generations" and "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" and "Star Trek - Nemesis". The researchers for this project were males and females 18–45, which were evenly split. Results showed that Captain Kirk w more arrogant, and Captain Picard was less arrogant. Group members demonstrated an openminded approach, agreeable behaviour, independent research, a receptive attitude, and extraversion.

Each group member will calculate reliability using the +/-1 range for each behaviour. Inter-observer reliability was 1(strong) 1(strong) 0.8(moderate) and 1(strong) 1(strong) 0.8(moderate).

Personality Psychology Arrogant Personality Trait

This study seeks to evaluate the levels of arrogance displayed by two captains. Personality encompasses a variety of characteristics, including qualities, interests, values, self-concept, abilities, and emotions. Numerous theories on human nature concur that behaviour is significantly influenced by personality. The field of personality psychology examines development, alteration, and maladaptive functioning. The study on the two captains focuses on the manifestation of arrogance traits and the temporal aspect of their display during the observation period, regardless of the perspectives of others. This behaviour is characterised by smirking, sneering, and a condescending or boastful demeanour when others speak. Both captains displayed conceited behaviour. The model for Realistic Accuracy Model demonstrated a precise evaluation of the trait of arrogance. Baumert et al. (2019) suggest that to comprehensively evaluate a reality accuracy model, dividing the number of correct predictions by the total number of predictions is necessary. The present research examines the degree of inter-rater reliability and the assessment of behavioural arrogance.

The present investigation necessitates the assessment of both the validity of personality tests and the reliability of inter-rater ratings. The topics of interest include inter-rater reliability, the realistic accuracy model, and personality traits. The researchers identified the presence of an arrogant trait in the behaviour of the two captains. According to Dorfman et al. (2021), examining personality traits can facilitate comprehension of how individuals perceive us. This notion underscores how individualised interpretations of one's experiences and environment influence human behaviour and cognition—the four-step process for conducting RAM personality testing. Researchers are required to utilise information related to the trait of arrogance in order to conduct their study. The impact of researcher characteristics, expertise, and personal qualities on the accuracy of the arrogant trait will be investigated. Most research endeavours have investigated personality development and factors that may moderate its trajectory. The Realistic Accuracy Model used in this study has stages that RAM can evaluate, including moral values, ethical principles, empathy, introspection, and other similar attributes.

Relevance.

The relevance of the target's information is determined by the trait being evaluated.

Availability.

Researchers can discern distinctive indicators within both spoken and non-spoken actions.

Detection.

The researcher determines the availability and importance of a trait. When the researcher fails to detect the most pertinent and accessible cues, it demonstrates a lack of precision.

Utilisation

The ultimate stage entails the researcher's application of relevant and appropriate indicators to render a subjective evaluation.

It is improbable for an individual's other Big Five personality traits to align with their proficiency in a single trait. A brief assessment tool is offered to measure the five-factor model of personality traits. Irrespective of the perceived attributes, traits hold significance and intrigue as they establish and exhibit distinctive behavioural patterns that endure over time. The patterns mentioned above have the potential to impact various facets of our everyday routines. Example: Achieving success in higher education. When prompted to consider the characteristics contributing to success in college, one may assess their intelligence quotient.

While studying two captains, researchers closely observed their body language and facial expressions to discern the behaviour exhibited during their interactions. Conscientiousness has been identified as a crucial trait by personality psychologists, particularly in the context of higher education and its implications for individuals' future endeavours. This assertion is likely because conscientious individuals exert significant effort in their academic pursuits. Greater levels of conscientiousness are positively associated with improved self-care practices for the body. Individuals who exhibit conscientiousness tend to engage in healthy behaviours such as consuming a balanced diet, engaging in frequent physical activity, and implementing practical measures such as utilising safety equipment. As mentioned above, the conduct can potentially impact an individual's well-being and longevity in the long run (Kerry, 2018). Personality traits have the potential to serve as a means of characterising individuals and enabling psychologists to anticipate their levels of effectiveness and lifespan, as well as professional and recreational preferences. Consequently, the field of personality psychology is being examined by health and organisational psychologists.

The likelihood of an individual's proficiency in a specific trait correlated with their other Big Five personality traits is low. We offer a brief assessment tool for measuring the five-factor model of personality traits. Regardless of their perceived characteristics, traits are of great academic interest as they establish and demonstrate unique behavioural patterns that arise and persist over time. Patterns mentioned above have the potential to impact various facets of our everyday routines. Example: When prompted to evaluate the determinants of academic achievement in college, one may evaluate their cognitive aptitude as gauged by their IQ score. It is commonly acknowledged that there exists knowledge of those who are more likely to achieve success than oneself.

Personality psychologists have identified conscientiousness as crucial in academic and post-academic contexts. Individuals who score higher in conscientiousness tend to exhibit superior levels of body care. Individuals who exhibit conscientiousness tend to engage in healthy behaviours such as consuming a nutritious diet, engaging in frequent physical activity, and adopting safety measures such as utilising protective equipment. Consequently, health and organisational psychologists have initiated research on personality psychology. Personality traits are utilised to depict individuals and aid psychologists in forecasting their efficiency, lifespan, and professional and recreational preferences.

Methods

Watching the two video clips, Video clip 1 was an 11-minute excerpt from "Star Trek - Generations" Video clips 2 and 3 came from "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" and "Star Trek - Nemesis", respectively (approx. 25-minute excerpts from each movie, each researcher listed every time Captain Kirk or Captain Picard demonstrated arrogance in one of the three operational categories.

Materials: Six researchers added that they thought about the capital behaviours and how often they were observed during the video clip. The researchers used their knowledge of the Big Five Personality Test (Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains, 2015) while observing the behaviour and measuring how many times Arrogant behaviour an identified by each captain.

Inter-rater reliability, realistic accuracy model, personality traits
(Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains, 2015).

Participants

• Six independent University of South Australia researchers were group members of this research. Males and females 18–45 were evenly split.

Materials

The research materials involved the analysis of two video clips, with Video Clip 1 comprising an 11-minute segment extracted from "Star Trek - Generations". The second and third video clips were from the films "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" and "Star Trek - Nemesis". The researchers analysed each clip, approximately 25 minutes in duration, to identify instances where Captain Kirk or Captain Picard exhibited arrogance within the three operational categories.

Reflection

Group member 1 demonstrated an open-minded approach by attentively considering the opinions of all group members prior to deciding. Group member 2 exhibited agreeable behaviour by actively listening to the group's discussion without interjecting their contributions—group member 4 conducted independent research to augment the group's ideas and overall awareness. Group member 5 displayed a receptive attitude towards the ideas of all group members. Group member 6 exhibited a higher level of extraversion, as evidenced by their tendency to initiate and steer conversations and actively participate in group tasks. I believe that all group members exhibit effective collaboration and equitable contribution towards the research endeavour while acknowledging the significance of the study.

Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back! Exam Question Bank is your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects.

Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.

To connect with expert and ask your query click here Exam Question Bank