diff_months: 10

Assessment 1 Essay/Report on PMBOK Knowledge Area PROJ701

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2024-11-26 01:00:26
Order Code:
Question Task Id: 488247

Assessment 1: Essay (Individual, PMBOK Knowledge Area)

Start Assignment



  • DueSundayby23:59

  • Points100

  • Submittinga file upload



Assessment 1:Essay or Report

Note: Assignment 1 could be written in the form of an essay or report. If you adopt a report format, please ensure that you have a clear beginning, middle, and end. E.g., reports also require an introduction, body, and conclusions.

Weighting:40%

Submission details:Online through MyUni

Task:The assessment requires students to:



  • Investigate a particular project management topic (for example, managing the project scope, project schedule, cost management) or any other PMBOK knowledge area.

  • Report their knowledge in respect to the selected topic by reflecting on the success or failure of a real project.



This assessment task requires the student demonstrate how well they comprehend their chosen PMBOK knowledge area. The student can opt to research their own project or select an external example.

Suggested external examples include:





Length and Presentation:

2,300-2,500 words(not including references and appendices)

Format and style



  1. Assignments are to be structured in an academic style (either essay or report).

  1. Supporting references are required (max 20), and must formatted using the Harvard Referencing style.

  1. Font size 12 , line-spacing 1.5 to 2.

  1. The assignment must include a title page showing your name and ID number.

  1. Assignments must be prepared as a single document in Microsoft Word format.



Some things to consider to ensure a high quality essay.



  • Originality and creative thought (please ensure an originality score on Turnitin below 10%)

  • Research up-to-date with topic (use a range of academic and non-academic resources 10 20 references)

  • Introduce the case study (real life project) briefly

  • Discuss the importance of the selected topic in project management

  • Explain the success or failure of the case study with regard to the selected topic

  • Clarity of expression, logical planning and sequence

  • Quality in the overall presentation.



PMBOK AREAS

Table of Contents





Individual project report: Marking rubric


Individual project report: Marking rubric


Criteria


Ratings


Pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrate comprehension and understanding of Project Management, terminology, principles, processes and practice.











20to >17.5pts


Above expected level


- Excellent coverage of core concepts covered in the course - Core concepts covered in the course correctly defined with no errors - Outstanding coverage of the core concepts covered in the course


17.5to >10.0pts


At expected level


- Core concepts covered in the course included - Core concepts covered in the course defined - Core concepts covered in the course correctly applied


10to >0pts


Below expected level


- Core concepts covered in the course omitted - Core concepts covered in the course incorrectly defined - Core concepts covered in the course incorrectly applied


20pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality and creative thought: Demonstrated awareness of and insight with regard to this topic.











10to >8.0pts


Full Marks


The project demonstrates understanding of the complex social and environmental challenges facing project managers.


8to >5.0pts


At expected level


Clear project topic connected to relevant societal issues


5to >0pts


Below expected level


Unclear or vague project. The project and elements of the project report are not connected to social and environmental issues facing project managers.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and evidence.











40to >34.0pts


Above expected level


- Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main project idea. - Writer demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed sections / paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organisation. - Mastery of and creative engagement with both foundational and current relevant literature in the field.


34to >20.0pts


At expected level


- Each section has sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the ideas/arguments. - Logical organisation, however, organisation of ideas are not fully developed. - Adequate coverage but limited as to viewpoints presented. - Reference to and discussion of foundational and current relevant supporting evidence and concepts but weak connection with examples.


20to >0pts


Below expected level


- No evidence of structure or adequate organisation. - Supporting research and evidence does not include some of the important references related to the field and subject of the study. - Incomplete or may only provide a list of arguments without being in dialogue with the literature. - Omissions and unsubstantiated interpretations. - Little evidence the candidate understands the foundational and current concepts.


40pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrated quality and depth of analysis.











20to >17.5pts


Above expected level


-Analysis is rigorous, nuanced, and transparent. The key argument is tied to the essay question and course foundations. - A rigorous discussion is provided showing a high level of engagement.


17.5to >10.0pts


At expected level


- The analysis connects back to the key concepts covered in class but may be weak. - Evidence and examples are adequately considered but could be more thorough. - Validity of the arguments is addressed but may lack depth.


10to >0pts


Below expected level


- The analysis may be incomplete and/or poorly organised and/or implemented. - Key arguments may not be supported by the analysis.


20pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrated quality of writing.











10to >8.5pts


Above expected level


- The project report is engaging and clear. - Provides a focused discussion of the key arguments, situating them in the literature to draw connections or point to differences with previous work. - Makes a compelling and interesting argument. - All cited works, references (Harvard style) are done in the correct format with no errors. - No errors in punctuation, capitalisation and spelling.


8.5to >5.0pts


At expected level


- The report is clear and easy to read. - Some cited works, some references missing and/or style with errors (Harvard style). - Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalisation and spelling.


5to >0pts


Below expected level


- Incomplete and/or unfocused. - The connection between the arguments and research may not be established in a convincing way. - Little or no interpretation is provided or the interpretation may not fit the findings. - Few cited works, incorrect format. (Harvard style). - Many errors in punctuation, capitalisation and spelling.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO 1


Understand and apply the basic content and techniques of the discipline of project management such that stakeholder needs, scope, time, cost, quality, risk, procurement, human resources, communications, and the integration of these are appropriately addressed.


threshold:3.0pts











5pts


Exceeds Expectations


3pts


Meets Expectations


0pts


Does Not Meet Expectations


--


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO 3


Select an appropriate project delivery system.


threshold:3.0pts











5pts


Exceeds Expectations


3pts


Meets Expectations


0pts


Does Not Meet Expectations


--


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO 5


Demonstrate continued learning and personal development.


threshold:3.0pts











5pts


Exceeds Expectations


3pts


Meets Expectations


0pts


Does Not Meet Expectations


--


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO 6


Recognise ethical, social and cultural issues and their importance for project managers.


threshold:3.0pts











5pts


Exceeds Expectations


3pts


Meets Expectations


0pts


Does Not Meet Expectations


--


Total Points:100

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : November 26th, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 133

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more