Assessment 3: Evaluation
ECE207 ASSESSMENT 3
Assessment 3: Evaluation
Evaluate the implementation of your music and/or performing art strategies (from assessment 2) during your placement using a rubric approved by your teacher.
Due after completion of placement
20% C,D
Assessment 3 Rubric
Marks
Criteria High Distinction
80%-100% Distinction
70%-79% Credit
60%-69% Pass
50%-59% Fail
0-49%
Structure and argument
/30 Argument expressed in a rational, compelling and convincing manner with strong critical evaluation
Essay incorporates high level of discussion based on scenarios with links to appropriate teaching and learning concepts
(24-30) Argument predominantly expressed in a rational and convincing manner a high level of critical evaluation
Essay incorporates a good level of discussion based on the scenarios provided with good links to teaching and learning concepts
(21-23.9) Argument is unclear at times.
Critical evaluation is partially evident
Reasonable level of discussion based on most of the scenarios provided with adequate links to teaching and learning concepts
(18-20.9) Argument unclear.
Low level of critical evaluation evident
Lowe level of discussion based on the scenarios. Discussion is inconsistent with minimal links to teaching and learning concepts
(15-17) No argument evident.
No critical analysis included in discussion
Inadequate integration of research findings to broader context.
Word count not met.
No examples provided
(0-14.9)
Knowledge: Understanding of topic
/30 Excellent understanding of the question.
Excellent evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Evidence of extensive research on pedagogical approaches for students with diverse backgrounds
(24-30) Very good understanding of the question.
Very good evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Very well researched pedagogical approaches for students with diverse backgrounds
(21-23.9) Good understanding of the question.
Good evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Very well researched.
Inclusion of pedagogical approaches for students from diverse backgrounds
(18-20.9) Adequate understanding of the question.
Adequate evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Adequate research evident.
Satisfactory information included on pedagogical approaches
(15-17) Inadequate understanding of the question.
Inadequate evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
No/inadequate research evident.
No inclusion of pedagogical approaches included in discussion
(0-14.9)
Style:
Grammar and expression
/20 The writing is academically rigorous, succinct and engaging
Written in formal language.
Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated.
Excellent use of language and expression with no errors
(16-20) The writing is predominantly academically rigorous, succinct and engaging
Predominantly written in formal language.
Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated most of the time.
Very good use of language and expression with no errors
.(14-15.5) The writing style is inconsistent, and sometimes lacks academic rigor.
Language is sometimes informal.
Significance of examples and quotes not consistently clear.
Good use of language and expression with some errors
(12-13.5) The writing style often lacks academic rigor.
Language is often informal.
Significance of examples and quotes is unclear.
Adequate use of language and expression with many errors
(10-11) The writing style lacks academic rigor.
Language is consistently informal.
No or few examples or quotes used.
Inadequate use of language and expression.
Consistent errors in essay
(0-9)
Citations and references
/20 Excellent citations and references using APA
Excellent critical analysis of selected references.
(16-20) Very good citations and references using APA
Very good critical analysis of selected references.
(14-15.5) Good citations and references using mostly APA
Good critical analysis of selected references.
(12-13.5) Adequate citations and references using some aspects of APA
Adequate critical analysis of selected references.
(10-11) Inadequate citations and references.
No APA evident
No critical analysis of selected references.
(0-9)
