Assessment Task 3: Career Development Analysis (40%)

Assessment Task 3: Career Development Analysis (40%)

Criteria Excellent (80-100%) Very Good (70-79%) Good (60-69%) Acceptable (50-59%) Unacceptable (<50%)

Key objectives identified (30% of total mark) Comprehensively outlined key objectives faced, based on excellent self-assessment survey. Effectively outlined key objectives faced with some analysis based on self-assessment survey. Outlined key objectives faced but more detail would have been useful, with little analysis based on self-assessment survey. Outlined some key objectives faced but more detail would have been useful with minimal analysis based on self-assessment survey. Failed to provide any key objectives with no analysis based on self-assessment survey.

Strategies or plan of actions (30% of total mark) Excellent, logical and relevant strategies to obtain career goals. The strategies are strongly supported by relevant and specific examples. Very good, logical and relevant strategies to obtain career goals. The strategies are well supported by relevant and specific examples. Good relevant strategies to obtain career goals. The strategies are supported by relevant and specific examples. Solid strategies to obtain career goals. The strategies do have relevant examples but require improvement.

Basic or underdeveloped strategies to obtain career goals. Examples are disjointed or incorrectly stated.

Reflection/Learning (20 % of total mark) Reflection showed deep insight and self- awareness about learning outcomes/curves. Reflection showed excellent insight and self- awareness about learning outcomes/curves. Reflection showed insight and self- awareness self- awareness about learning outcomes/curves. Reflection showed some insight and self- awareness about learning outcomes/curves. Failed to show insight or self- awareness about learning outcomes/curves.

Structure, organisation, writing

(10% of total mark) Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; excellent overall organisation. Excellent grammar and spelling. Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; good overall organisation. Very good grammar and spelling. Structured well enough to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic, may lack focus, engagement or summary. Good grammar and spelling. Mostly coherent organisation; may have some sections where difficult to follow reasoning. Could be more clearly and logically organised. Some grammar and spelling errors. Lacks coherent organisation and structure. Describes disconnected bits of information or many direct quotes. Poor spelling and grammar.

References (10% of total mark) Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing. Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing. Acceptable use of relevant sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. Few if any literature sources included and poor referencing.