Assignment 1: Critical Review of Literature

Assignment 1: Critical Review of Literature

Assignment Assignment 1: Critical Review of Literature

Due Date Week 6

Word Count 1500

Weight 35%

Important Resources Find File on Canvas

Description: This assignment enables the student to draw on the content of this unit to produce a critique of literature related to a key aspect of health information management. Students will be expected to select a topic, review the identified topic, and choose a minimum of 5 papers from peer reviewed journals, not more than 10 years old, to critique and provide an argument to support or refute the use of electronic health records or health information systems over other methods based on benefits, challenges, risks, costs, effectiveness, efficiency, ethics, confidentiality, or privacy factors. The critical review of literature will be due in module 5 and will be assessed using the appropriate Rubric.Example topics:

Benefits and challenges of adopting electronic health records

Confidentiality and privacy issues that emerge when using electronic health records

Cost-effectiveness of adopting and using electronic health records

Feel free to choose one of these example topics, or your own similar or different topic, and conduct a critical review of literature on that topic.

Writing Literature Review Resources:

Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review

https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149

How to Write a Stellar Literature Review

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/literature-review/

Rubric of Assignment 1: Critical Review of Literature

Criteria HD >85% D 75-84% C 65-74% P 50-64% F 0-49%

Understanding of topic, including background and rationale (40%) The proposal demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and background of the topic, provides a clear rationale for why it was selected, and clearly justifies how this will help develop the e-health field. The proposal demonstrates a thorough knowledge and background of the topic, provides a rationale for why it was selected, and justifies how this will help develop the e- health field. The proposal demonstrates a good understanding and background of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however was somewhat unclear in places, including how this will help develop the e-health field. The proposal demonstrates some understanding and background of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however was unclear in places, including how this will help develop the e-health field. The proposal does not demonstrate a clear understanding and background of the topic, provide a rationale for why it was selected.

Scan of the literature (30%) The scan of the literature provides clear background information about the topic, citing highly relevant sources that will contribute to the topic of interest. The scan of the literature provides background information about the topic, citing relevant sources that will contribute to the topic of interest. The scan of the literature provides background information about the topic, but a slightly wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will contribute to the topic of interest. The scan of the literature provides background information about the topic, but is limited, and a wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will contribute to the topic of interest. The scan of the literature did not provide clear background information about the topic or cite relevant sources that will contribute to the topic of interest.

Structure and presentation (20%) The ideas are written and structured with excellent clarity and cohesion, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues. The ideas are written and structured in a very clear manner, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues. The ideas are written and structured in a clear manner, with only minor wording, spelling and grammatical issues. The ideas are written in a reasonably clear manner, however there are some structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues. There are many structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues

Referencing using APA 7th edition

(10%) Referencing is excellently used, with correct in-text citations and the reference list. Referencing is well used with no errors with in-text citations and the reference list. Referencing is well used and only minor errors with in- text citations and the reference list. Although referencing is used, there are errors with in- text citations and the reference list. There are many errors with the referencing with in-text citations and the reference list.