Assignment Brief 5LI021 Researching Leisure 23/24
Assignment Brief 5LI021 Researching Leisure 23/24
Topic Detail
Academic year / semester Semester 2, 2023-24
Module code and title 5LI021 Researching Leisure
Module Leader Dr Roya Rahimi
Assignment name Coursework
Assignment type Conference paper and in person presentation
Assignment weighting and size 2,500 word conference paper with 10 minute presentation
Assessment unpacking video location TBC
Whats my assignment? unpacking date (if applicable) Week 3 of teaching
Formative submission date (if applicable) Week 10
Formative submission method (if applicable) Canvas / in class
Formative feedback date (if applicable) Week 12
Summative (i.e., final) submission date See canvas
Summative submission method Conference paper and presentation resources to be submitted via Canvas (75% weighting)
Presentation to be presented in person on City campus (25% weighting)
Assignment requirements Part 1 Research Paper (with conference abstract):
Select a contemporary issue in the leisure industries and develop a 2,500-word conference paper (with a 250- word abstract) discussing and debating this issue. The paper will require a clear structure and evidence of considerable engagement with relevant literature and contemporary research to develop an informed and incisive discussion. The paper will not necessarily make recommendations but will be expected to develop a logical argument and a clear conclusion which may raise further questions or suggest a particular perspective on the selected issue.
Research Paper and presentation to be submitted to the 5LI021 Canvas topic
Part 2 Conference Presentation:
Students will prepare and deliver a 10-minute presentation which will cover the key discussions and findings from their conference paper. The presentation will be followed by 5 minutes of questions about the paper. Please note that you will not be required to present in the presence of other students, only to your tutor/s.
You will be provided with a specific time slot for your presentation closer to the time.
(Marks will be amalgamated from the two assessments, with a weighting of 75% for the paper and 25% for the presentation)
Learning outcomes LO1 Synthesise key concepts and issues to inform a discussion on leisure research.
LO2 Utilise a research lens to inform a review of extant literature.
LO3 Deliver a research conference paper and presentation on a chosen contemporary theme.
Assessment criteria(see rubric below for performance criteria) (Including individual weighting, if applicable, and the learning outcomes being assessed)
Introduction of key topics and clear rationale for choice of topic (20%)
Use and application of theory and research to support arguments/discussion (35%)
Academic writing skills presentation of work, clarity of discussion and Harvard referencing (20%)
Presentation of research paper with response to questions (25%)
Characteristics of a good submission (List up to five points that will help students to understand what a good submission looks like)
Evidence of considerable research that has been utilised to support arguments and discussions, well-presented and Harvard referenced throughout.
Abstract is clear and concise with clear justification for choice of research topic.
A confidently presented, well-rehearsed presentation.
Theory has been utilised and applied to discussion.
Clear conclusion which may include questions or recommendations for future research.
Additional instructions Students should ensure that they upload their presentation slides to the canvas topic before they present their work at the conference. You will not be permitted to make any amendments to your submission after you have presented.
Professional Body requirements (If applicable)
University regulations Universitys Academic RegulationsAcademic Integrity PolicyLevel and Mark DescriptorsSupport Student Support and WellbeingStudy GuidesSkills for Learning Introduction to Academic Study SkillsAcademic English Language SkillsYou should also refer to your Course and Module Guides
Date by which feedback will be provided 4 weeks from submission.
Feedback format Written available through canvas.
Resit details The Resit requirement for this assignment is to provide a rework of the original submission, with additions and amendments highlighted, to indicate where you have applied the feedback received.
Assessment Rubric
Criteria Outstanding/Excellent Very Good Good Sufficient Insufficient/Fail
Introduction of key topics and clear rationale for choice of topic (20%)
(LO1) An excellent abstract is provided. The stand-alone piece succinctly presents an effective summary of the paper featuring contextual background, aim, method, findings and conclusion.
The work starts with an excellent introduction that provides a clear rationale for the choice of, and context to the chosen contemporary topic.
14-20 points The abstract presents an effective summary of the paper featuring: contextual background, aim, method, findings and conclusion.
The work provides a very good introduction that states a clear rationale for the choice of, and context to the chosen contemporary topic.
12-13 points This is a sound abstract that features essential parts of an effective summary.
The paper starts with a reasonable introduction and provides justification for the choice of the chosen contemporary topic.
10-11 points This is a satisfactory abstract that features some, but not all essential parts of an effective summary.
The introduction is adequate but it should have effectively establish the context of and justify the choice of the topic.
8-9 points This abstract does not feature all essential parts of an effective summary and struggles with coherence.
There is insufficient justification for the choice of topic and the context is not clearlyset.
0-7 points
Use and application of theory and research to support arguments/discussion (35%)
(LO2) Outstanding/Excellent engagement with relevant literature and academic debates giving rise to a detailed and theory-based review of the chosen topic. Excellent use of literature in substantiating argument/discussion. The work demonstrates a high level of synthesises whilst also comparing and contrasting the views of different authors confidently.
25-35 points
Very good engagement with pertinent academic debates and resources which culminate to a robust theory-based review of the chosen contemporary topic. Very good use of academic and industry material in supporting argument/discussion. Student has made a very good attempt to synthesise and has compared and contrasted the views of different authors.
21-24 points
Good presentation of theory-based review with adequate engagement with relevant academic discourse in the subject matter.
Discussion/argument are well supported with relevant academic and industry material. Student has begun to compare and contrast the views of different authors.
18-20 points Sufficient theory-based review and engagement with relevant academic discourse in the subject matter.
The work uses sufficient current research and evidence in supporting discussion.
14-17 points
Minimal engagement with relevant academic discourse which resulted into a limited theory-based review of the chosen contemporary topic. Minimal use of pertinent literature to support discussion.
0-13 points
Academic writing skills presentation of work, clarity of discussion and Harvard referencing (20%)
(LO1, LO3) Work is presented to an extremely high standard in a professional manner. Harvard referencing has no obvious errors and is consistent throughout. Complex arguments are made clearly and concisely with independent thought. A wide range of sources have been utilised to inform the work. Clear evidence of exceptional level of independent reading and research.
14-20 points Work is presented to a very good standard and appears professional. Harvard referencing has few/no minor errors and is consistent throughout. Arguments are made clearly. Evidence of independent reading and research. A range of sources have been utilised to inform the work.
12-13 points Work is presented to a good standard. Harvard referencing is consistent but features errors. Sound capacity to express views. Some evidence of reading outside the module reading list.
10-11 points Work is presented to a satisfactory standard. Harvard referencing is present but is inconsistent and requires improvement. Satisfactory capacity to express views however some arguments may be unclear. A little evidence of reading outside of the module reading list but relies heavily on resources provided on module.
8-9 points Work is presented in to an unsatisfactory standard. Errors are present throughout. Harvard referencing is below standard expected or may be absent. Academic writing skills require significant improvement. Work lacks clarity and arguments are confusing/unsubstantiated. Relies almost solely on the resources provided on canvas.
0-7 points
Presentation of research paper with response to questions (25%)
(LO3) Excellent level of independent thought in the discussion and evaluation of the chosen topic. Presentation is confident and very well-rehearsed, using minimal notes. Student is clearly confident in their knowledge and is able to answer questions very well with significant detail.
18-25 points
Very good capacity to express views that are based on sound argument and solid evidence in discussing and evaluating the chosen topic. Presentation runs very smoothly with minimal notes. Student is able to answer questions with minimal hesitation and detail.
15-17 points Sound capacity in expressing views. Presentation is clear. Good discussion and evaluation of the chosen topic based on sound argument and reasonable evidence. Presentation runs smoothly, student may rely on notes. Student is able to answer questions but may lack detail.
13-14 points Satisfactory capacity in expressing views based on reasonable argument and relevant evidence in evaluating the chosen topic. Student relies on notes. Able to answer questions but with minimal detail.
10-12 points Limited capacity in presenting sound arguments and solid evidence to support the evaluation of the chosen topic. Arguments are unclear or confused. Student is clearly unsure of knowledge of subject area and is unable to answer questions to a satisfactory standard.
0-9 points
