BSc (Honors) Top-Up
BSc (Honors) Top-Up
Cohort 13
BMP 6025
Dissertation
MODULE GUIDE
2023/2024
Semester 2
Level HE6
Contents
TOC o "1-3" h z u 1. Key Information PAGEREF _Toc137634594 h 22. Module Communications PAGEREF _Toc137634595 h 23. Module Description PAGEREF _Toc137634596 h 24. Learning and Teaching: Campus Plus PAGEREF _Toc137634597 h 25. Graduate Attributes PAGEREF _Toc137634598 h 36. Learning Outcomes and Assessments PAGEREF _Toc137634599 h 47. Assessment Deadlines PAGEREF _Toc137634600 h 48. Assessment Feedback PAGEREF _Toc137634601 h 49. Module Calendar PAGEREF _Toc137634602 h 510. Formative Assessment PAGEREF _Toc137634603 h 611. Indicative Reading PAGEREF _Toc137634604 h 612. Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of Written Assessments PAGEREF _Toc137634605 h 613. Procedures for Other Assessments PAGEREF _Toc137634606 h 714. Academic Misconduct PAGEREF _Toc137634607 h 815. Assessments PAGEREF _Toc137634608 h 916. General Assessment Criteria for Written Assessments PAGEREF _Toc137634609 h 14
1. Key Information
Module Tutor Dr. Nazeefa Fawzer
Module Tutor Email nazeefa.fawzer@wincedu.uk
Availability and Contact Method(s) In Class, Via email
Scheduled drop-in hours available for support online on Saturday 10.00 AM UK time
Weblink to Moodle Class https://moodle.bolton.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=29810Weblink to Module Specification https://modules.bolton.ac.uk/bmp6025
2. Module CommunicationsThe Module Tutors contact details are provided above. You must check your University of Bolton email address and the Moodle area dedicated to this module regularly as many module communications are channelled through these media.
Your Module Tutor will normally aim to respond to your email messages within 2 full working days of receipt. However, responses will be longer in holiday periods.
3. Module Description
This dissertation module is designed to give you the opportunity to pursue a piece of individual research under the supervision of a tutor. The research focus must be relevant to business management, and if you have opted to follow a specific pathway, relevant to that pathway. The work should be academically rigorous, unique and address a specific question or issue. You will need to evaluate theories, principles, concepts, and models relating to contemporary business and management practices. The work will also require you to undertake primary research and demonstrate familiarity with a range of research methodologies. Throughout the process you are required to critically appraise your skills development. This module will incorporate the following GAME Attributes: Resilient, Adaptable, Collaborative and Lifelong Learning.
The first component is a research portfolio which will later develop to Chapter 1 of Dissertation in Semester 2. Portfolio however sets the stepping-stone for Literature Review which develops further as in component 2. The feedback from C1 will resonate into development of C2 which later develops into full chapter 2 of BMP6025Dissertation taught in semester 2. The other sections of C1-Portfolio also provide an outline of Chapter 3 Research Methodology (Semester 2). [COHERENCE]
This module of BMP6025 Dissertation Part1 is pre-requisite for BMP6025 Dissertation Part 2 module based on COHERENCE of components. BMP6025 Part 1 helps to develop skills for systematic investigation among Managers to identify and resolve problems in real life organisations with contemporary situations. Students will have a choice of selecting any Business Management based domain to contextualise their research problem. The learning focuses on development of a proposal driven by credible research within the ethical context. Critical and contemporary literature is essential to develop a firm conceptual knowledge. Project plan helps developing planning skills and time management among learners [CONTEMPORARY, CHOICE, CHALLENGE, & CONSOLIDATION]
4. Learning and Teaching: Campus Plus
This module is delivered over 12 live synchronous online sessions using a Campus Plus blended learning approach which involves campus-based sessions, supported by scheduled online learning.
Scheduled sessions will comprise lectures, seminars, workshops, and tutorials. Delivery will be supported by group activities, online discussions and activities posted on the VLE. If you are unable to attend a scheduled session due to factors outside your control, you are expected to inform your tutor and engage in any activities set before the next session. To support your learning, online sessions may be recorded and made available on Moodle (for up to one year).
Note: Sessions recorded on the cloud will be deleted after a year unless settings allow otherwise.
In weeks 6,10,11, tutorials will take place which will provide you with the opportunity to discuss your progress on the module and receive feedback on assessments. This will be online as arranged.
To complete the module successfully you must allocate a substantial amount of independent study time, which will involve undertaking directed study and assessment activities. Directed study activities will include preparation for in class activities, background reading, research activities etc.
5. Graduate Attributes
Graduate attributes are the personal qualities and skills which the University of Bolton community values, and which a student is expected to develop during their time at the University. Graduate attributes act as a point of reference for a students personal development and support the articulation of employability and transferable skills.
In total there are 10 graduate attributes (GAME). This module seeks to support the development of Self-awareness, resilience, problem solving, effective communication, global citizenship (includes sustainability), enterprise, adaptability, collaboration, confidence, life-long learning .
6. Learning Outcomes and AssessmentsModule Learning Outcomes Assessment No. and Type
LO1: Identify an appropriate research topic and formulate appropriate objectives Assessment 1:Coursework
Portfolio & Dissertation
LO2: Develop an effective research strategy in which ethical considerations are critically appraised Assessment 1:Coursework
Portfolio
LO3: Produce a critical literature review and research methodology Assessment 2:Coursework
Dissertation
LO4: Undertake primary research and critically appraise the results Assessment 2:Coursework
Dissertation
LO5: Synthesise research findings and make informed judgements in the light of these Assessment 2:
CourseworkDissertation
LO6: Critically reflect on your skills and abilities as a researcher Assessment 3:Practical
Presentation + Viva
7. Assessment DeadlinesAssessment item Due Date Weight
1 Research portfolio including proposal, research strategy and ethics form 17/12/2023 10%
2 Dissertation 20/04/2024 70%
3 Oral Assessment 27/04/2024 20%
8. Assessment FeedbackFeedback on items of assessment can be formal (such as on a signed feedback form) or informal (such as advice from a tutor in a tutorial). Feedback is therefore not just your grade or the comments written on your feedback form, it is advice you get from your tutor and sometimes your peers about how your work is progressing, how well you have done, what further actions you might take.
We recognise the value of prompt feedback on work submitted. Other than in exceptional circumstances (such as might be caused by staff illness), you can expect your work to be marked and feedback provided not more than 15 working days from the deadline date. However, please note that such feedback will be provisional and unconfirmed until the Assessment Board has met and may therefore be subject to change.
Please take time to read or listen to your assessment feedback. This can be very useful in determining your strengths and key areas for development, and can therefore help you improve on future grades.
9. Module CalendarSession No. Date or Week Commencing Topics Covered Planned Delivery Method*
1 24/09/2023 Introduction to the Module, VLE and Assessments Zoom
2 01/10/2023 Examining a research problem and identifying research topics Zoom
3 08/10/2023 Assessment briefing and online workshop Zoom
4 15/10/2023 Determining research questions and developing research objectives Zoom
5 22/10/2023 Research Project Management Planning, Management and Progress Evaluation Zoom
6 29/10/2023 Tutorial / One-to-feedback / Consultations (2) Zoom
7 05/11/2023 Developing a critical literature review (1) Zoom
8 12/11/2023 Developing a critical literature review (2) Zoom
9 19/11/2023 Research Philosophies, Strategies and Approaches Zoom
10 26/11/2023 Tutorial / One-to-feedback / Consultations (2) Zoom
11 03/12/2023 Introduction to research methods and design
Feedback tutorials Zoom
12 10/12/2023 Ethical considerations and approval Zoom
13 12/12/2023 Conceptual Frameworks
Zoom
Submission
Deadlines 17/12/2023 Assignment 1 submission(Research Proposal) Via Turnitin
03/01/2024 Assignment 2 Chapter 2 Draft Literature Review Via Turnitin
03/01/2024 Chapter 3 Draft Research Methodology Via Turnitin
16 03/02/2024 Feedback Discussion Chapter 2 and 3 Zoom
17 10/02/2024 Research Methodology Quantitative and Qualitative Study Zoom
18 17/02/2024 Review and revisiting Chapter 2 Zoom
19 24/02/2024 Review and revisiting Chapter 3 / Variables and Conceptual Framework Zoom
20 02/03/2024 Designing Quantitative Data Collection Instrument (s) Questionnaire development/ operationalization table Zoom
21 09/03/2024 Designing Qualitative Data Collection Instrument (s) - Interview Zoom
22 16/03/2024 Administering Data Collection and Data Presentation Consent forms and Ethical considerations Zoom
23 23/03/2024 Quantitative data analysis Excel/SPSS/Basic Statistics How to interpret results Zoom
24 30/03/2024 Qualitative data analysis Thematic analysis how to write qualitative analysis Zoom
25 06/04/2024 Project Write-Up (Abstract, Introduction, Conclusions, & Recommendations) Zoom
26 13/04/2024 Research Skills Development and Reflection Zoom
Submission
Deadlines 20/04/2024 Task 2 Dissertation Submission Via Turnitin
27/04/2024 Task 3 Reflective Presentation Via Turnitin / Zoom
10. Formative AssessmentFormative assessment is employed to support your learning on the module, allowing you to reflect on feedback on your progress from your tutors and peers. It takes a variety of forms including group activities, in-session Q&A, self-reflection, individual study tasks issued on the VLE and does not contribute to the final module mark.
11. Indicative Reading
Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2021) Business Research, A Practical Guide for Undergraduate & Postgraduate Students. 5th ed. London: Palgrave MacMillan
Creswell, W, J. and Creswell, D,J.(2023) Research Design - International Student Edition: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.6th ed. Sage Publications,IncSaunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019) Research Methods for Business Students. 8th ed. London: Pearson
Wilson, J. (2013) Essentials of Business Research: a guide to doing your research project. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Dependent on focus (e-journal)
Whittington, R., Regnr, P., Angwin, D., Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (2019) Exploring Strategy, Text and Cases. 12th ed. Harlow: Pearson
For further details see https://libguides.bolton.ac.uk/academic-staff/resource-lists.
12. Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of Written Assessments
Written assessments should be word-processed in Arial or Calibri Light font size 12. There should be double-spacing and each page should be numbered.
There should be a title page identifying the programme name, module title, assessment title, your student number, your marking tutor and the date of submission.
You should include a word-count at the front page of the assessment (excluding cover page, table of content, references, and appendices).
Where a word limit is specified, the following penalty systems applies:
Up to 10% over the specified word length = no penalty
10 20% over the specified indicative word length = 5 marks subtracted (but if the assessment would normally gain a pass mark, then the final mark to be no lower than the pass mark for the assessment).
More than 20% over the indicative word length = if the assessment would normally gain a pass mark or more, then the final mark will capped at the pass mark for the assessment.
4. All written work should be referenced using the standard University of Bolton referencing
using Harvard Referencing style.
see: https://libguides.bolton.ac.uk/resources/referencing/Unless otherwise notified by your Module Tutor, electronic copies of assignments should be saved as word documents and uploaded into Turnitin via the Moodle class area. If you experience problems in uploading your work, then you must send an electronic copy of your assessment to your Module Tutor via email BEFORE the due date/time.
Please note that when you submit your work to Moodle, it will automatically be checked for matches against other electronic information, as well as for hidden text characters and AI generated text. You will be able to see similarity matches but not currently flags for hidden characters and AI-generated text. The outcomes of Turnitin reports may be used as evidence in an academic misconduct investigation (see Section 14).
Late work
Late work will be subject to the following penalties:
Up to 7 calendar days late = 10 marks subtracted but if the assignment would normally gain a pass mark, then the final mark to be no lower than the pass mark for the assignment.
More than 7 calendar days late = This will be counted as non-submission and no marks will be recorded.
Late submission of assessments on refer and those which are graded Pass/Fail only, is not permitted unless an extension is approved. See below.
Extensions
In the case of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances, an extension of up to 14 days after the assessment deadline may be requested using the standard University Extension Request Form. For approval there would need to be an explanation and evidence of relevant circumstances.
Longer extensions for individual assessments, projects and artefacts may be granted, at the discretion of the Programme Leader.
Requests for extensions which take a submission date past the end of the module (normally week 15) must be made using the Mitigating Circumstances procedure.
Some students with registered disabilities will be eligible for revised submission deadlines. Revised submission deadlines for disability adjustments do not require the completion extension request paperwork. However, students should request these in writing in advance.
Please note that the failure of data storage systems is not considered to be a valid reason for an extension. It is therefore important that you keep multiple copies of your work on different storage devices before submitting it.
13. Procedures for Other Assessments
Please see the assignment brief for all assessment procedures. Presentation schedules (or
dates for Viva Voce) will be confirmed in class however the submission deadline date is
indicated on the assessment deadline.
14. Academic MisconductAcademic misconduct may be defined as any attempt by a student to gain an unfair advantage in any assessment. This includes plagiarism, collusion, commissioning (contract cheating) amongst other offences. In order to avoid these types of academic misconduct, you should ensure that all your work is your own and that sources are attributed using the correct referencing techniques. You can also check originality through Turnitin.
Please note that penalties apply if academic misconduct is proven. See the following link for further details: https://www.bolton.ac.uk/student-policy-zone/student-policy-zone-2022-23/academic-misconduct-regulations-and-procedures-2022-23
15. AssessmentsAssessment Number 1
Assessment Type (and weighting) Portfolio (10%) 2000 words
Assessment Name Research portfolio including proposal, research strategy and ethics form
Assessment Submission Date 17/12/2023
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO1: Identify an appropriate research topic and formulate appropriate objectives
LO2: Develop an effective research strategy in which ethical considerations are critically appraised
Assessment Brief
Assignment Task 1 Portfolio (10% of Total Marks) 2000 words
This written assignment requires to develop a Research Portfolio of 2000 words in which you develop a Research Proposal by identifying an appropriate research topic, formulating research questions and objectives (should be approved by the supervisor). The research topic should be of sufficient interest to you to ultimately be the basis for your dissertation project. Explain and rationalize the problem or issue selected. You should demonstrate your research skills by critically analysing journal articles and designing of a suitable research strategy along with the consideration of ethical issues. Ethics form should be approved by the supervisor prior to research commencement. Evidence of approval is required.
Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:
Level HE6 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and five academic books.
Assessment Number 2
Assessment Type (and weighting) Coursework (70%) 10,000 words
Assessment Name Literature Review Draft
(3000 words) Research Methodology Draft
(1500 words) Dissertation
Assessment Submission Date 03/01/2024 03/01/2024 20/04/2024
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO1: Identify an appropriate research topic and formulate appropriate objectives
LO3: Produce a critical literature review and research methodology
LO4: Undertake primary research and critically appraise the results
LO5: Synthesise research findings and make informed judgements in the light of these
Assessment Brief
Assignment Task 2 Dissertation (70% of Total Marks) 10,000 words
The second assessment should be maximum 10,000 words dissertation covering a relevant business management topic based on your Research Portfolio in Task 1. The length of Dissertation should not exceed more than 10,000 words. The Dissertation should be structured in chapters covering Introduction, Literature Review, Research Methodology, Analysis of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations. The word count is exclusive of Abstract, Table of Contents / Figures, References and Appendices.
Two chapters from Dissertation will be completed in Semester 1. These include Chapter 2: Critical Analysis of Literature Review and Chapter 3: Research Methodology.
Chapter 1, 4, 5 and 6 for full dissertation write-up will be developed in Semester 2.
03/01/2024 is the date for draft submission of Chapter 2 & 3 (formative assessment). These chapters would, however, only be marked as the part of full Dissertation after final submission.
Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:
Level HE6 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between twenty-five to thirty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include 10 refereed academic journals and 7 academic books.
Specific Assessment Criteria:
(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 16)
Excellent (70% and above):
Introduction to research Context is exceptionally clear and concise. Clear statement of problem and associated objectives. Persuasive and comprehensive rationale. Task demanding. There is evidence of extensive in-depth additional research using Primary data. An excellent range of authoritative secondary data sources has been researched and used. Referencing is clear, relevant and consistently accurate with extensive range of resources. Review of literature is critical, and relevant to study. Comprehensive knowledge. Conceptual framework underpins study. The Research methodology shows evidence of extensive in-depth research with clear research design. Research methods are evaluated and selection is justified with reasoning. All the chapters are effectively constructed and demonstrate excellent coherence and cross-referencing. There is clarity of expression, with consistently accurate use of grammar and spelling, with fluent professional/academic writing.
Very Good (60-69%):
Introduction to research Context is clear and concise. Subject valid and relevant. Appropriate rationale. Chapters are clear and explicit. Scope for study is appropriate. Focus maintained on issue. Evidence of additional research shown. Correctly referenced where necessary. The background to the project is described but one or two areas could be more detailed. The research question(s) are clear and achievable. Evidence of additional research evident. Sound knowledge of topic. Some critical review. Conceptual framework underpins study. Clear review including majority of academic journal references. There is significant evidence of originality and creativity as appropriate. A wide range of authoritative secondary data sources has been researched and used. Research methodology is clearly defined with justification of selection. Sources are accurately cited and an appropriate reference list/bibliography in the correct style if provided. The work is generally clearly presented, with good grammar and spelling.
Good (50-59%):
Introduction to research Context is clear. Subject is valid and relevant. Some shortcomings in clarity of purpose and associated objectives. Task definition could improve but clear & explicit. Some additional research shown, and sources are referenced. A simple description of the background to the project is provided. Research question(s) is stated but lacks depth. Satisfactory knowledge. Gaps and omissions in literature review. Some attempt at critical comment. Conceptual framework may be incomplete or inappropriate. The chapters are reasonably structured. There are relatively minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing.
Satisfactory (40-49%)
Introduction to research Context is marginally acceptable. Research questions and objectives lack clarity and focus. An attempt has been made to conduct additional research through primary data collection; the instrument / methods are however ineffective. Literature reviewed is largely descriptive and lack critical discussion. Insufficient reading and research demonstrated. Chapter are ineffectively structure and lack coherence. Some omissions are evident in the deployment of the relevant information/skills. There is evidence of a limited integration of theory, practice and information in relation to management skills and a limited evidence of originality and creativity. The candidate provides very limited referencing including some inconsistencies and inaccuracies.
Fail (39% and below):
Introduction to research Context is underdeveloped, unclear or absent. Research question is unclear, unfeasible or absent. Communication and presentation - often poor or ambiguous, leading to meaning being barely apparent. Language, grammar and spelling poor. Research philosophy is not understood/not related to objectives. Other relevant considerations are omitted or superficial. Deficiencies or omissions in information, skills, and theoretical, conceptual, analytical, creative or practical elements relating to effective team working are found. There is poor integration of these in relation to the question set. There is little or no evidence of originality and creativity as appropriate.
Assessment Number 3
Assessment Type (and weighting) Practical (20%)
Assessment Name Reflective Viva and Presentation
Assessment Submission Date 27/04/2024
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO6: Critically reflect on your skills and abilities as a researcher
Assessment Brief
Assignment Task 3 Reflection (20% of Total Marks)
The third assessment is a viva in which you critically appraise your academic, professional and personal skills and goals. You expected to critically reflect on your development throughout your research indicating what lessons have been learnt. You should reflect upon what problems were encountered during the course of the project, and how these were overcome, as well as providing a brief discussion of what aspects of the work you found the most interesting and/or challenging.
You are required to include a 15-Minutes PowerPoint Presentation to support your verbal presentation and showcase your findings and conclusions.
Guidance:
Include highlights of each chapter then reflect on the following points for each chapter:
What happened during development of this particular research chapter that was unexpected? (any challenges?)
What did you do to react to unexpected changes?
What impact did this have on your research?
What did you learn about yourself? (Your strengths and weaknesses)
You should then summarise in your presentation that as a result of the learning above,
What are you going to change about yourself?
How will you apply what you have learnt to work?
What areas of research would you like to investigate next?
How has this experienced shaped your future (learning/work/personal)?
You are not expected to include references for your viva presentation.
Specific Assessment Criteria:
(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 15)
Excellent (70% and above):
The presentation provides an excellent set of very well-designed slides, with excellent content, indicating reflection and thorough critical analysis of own development. Logical reflection has been made on problems encountered and how the researcher overcame each of them in a cohesive manner across the timeline. References have been made to each instance and respective elements of chapters. Lessons learnt have been well articulated with identified strengths and areas of development. An action plan or future recommendations have been outlined.
Very Good (60-69%):
The presentation provides a very good set of well-designed slides, with good content, indicating reflection and fair critical analysis of own development. Reflection has been made on problems encountered and how the researcher overcame each of them in a cohesive manner. References have been made to respective elements of chapters. Lessons learnt have been fairly articulated with identified strengths and areas of development.
Good (50-59%):
The presentation provides a fair set of reasonable slides, with acceptable content, indicating reflection and some critical analysis of own development. Reflection has been made on problems encountered; clarity required to demonstrate how researcher overcame them. References have been made to respective chapters at some point. Lessons learnt have been indicated. Lack explicit discussion of strength and areas that require further improvement
Satisfactory (40-49%)
The presentation provides a marginally acceptable set of slides, with some content, indicating reflection of own development. The reflection lack critical analysis. Problems encountered during the research have not been clearly outlined. Lacks references to specific instances. Reflection is largely generic. Lessons learnt have not been indicated. Lack discussion of strength and areas that require further improvement
Fail (39% and below):
The presentation provides a very weak set of slides with irrelevant content. The researcher has failed to reflect on his development and / or problems encountered during the research. The assessment criterion is not met and does not qualify for a pass.
16. General Assessment Criteria for Written Assessments
GENERAL ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES LEVEL HE6
Relevance
Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass Knowledge and Understanding Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/
Referencing Written English Presentation and Structure
Class I(Exceptional Quality)
85% - 100% Work is directly relevant and expertly addresses the requirements of the brief.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates an exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice beyond the threshold expectation for the level.
Demonstrates mastery in conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. Presents an exceptional synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a broad range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, systematic, justified and insightful conclusions.
Provides a sophisticated critical insight and expertly interprets complex matters and ideas.
Demonstrates exceptional creative flair and a high level of originality.
Demonstrates exceptional problem- solving skills and initiative. Provides insightful reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. An extensive range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An exceptionally well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used. The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured.
Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images.
Class I(Excellent Quality)
70% - 84% Work is relevant and comprehensively addresses the requirements of the brief.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates an excellent breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates an in-depth conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. Presents an excellent synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a broad range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, systematic, justified and perceptive conclusions.
Provides a critical insight and clearly interprets complex
matters and ideas.Demonstrates creative flair and a high level of originality.
Demonstrates excellent problem- solving skills and initiative. Provides excellent reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. A wide range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An excellently well written answer with competent, spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used. The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured
Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images.
Class II/i(Very Good Quality)
60% - 69% Work is relevant and addresses most of the requirements of the brief well.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a thorough breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates a sophisticated conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. Presents a perceptive synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, justified and thoughtful conclusions.
Interprets complex matters and ideas well.Demonstrates a good level of creativity and originality.
Demonstrates strong problem- solving skills. Provides very good reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. A wide range of relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Sources cited accurately in the main in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. A very well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A range of appropriate vocabulary is used. The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured in the main.
Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images.
Relevance
Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass Knowledge and Understanding Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/
Referencing Written English Presentation and Structure
Class II/ii(Good Quality)
50% - 59% Work addresses key requirements of the brief. Some irrelevant content.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a sound breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates a sound conceptual understanding of specialised areas. Presents a logical evaluation of findings from a range of relevant sources in order to draw clear and justified conclusions.
Interprets some complex matters and ideas.Demonstrates some creativity.
Demonstrates effective problem-solving skills and initiative. Provides good reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. A range of relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Most sources accurately cited both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography. Writing style is mostly appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent and minor lapses do not pose difficulty for the reader. Paragraphs are structured and include some linking and signposting. Sentences are complete.
A range of appropriate vocabulary is used. The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Logically structured in the most part.
Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not all relevant or referred to.
Class III(Satisfactory Quality)
40% - 49% Work addresses the requirements of the brief, although superficially in places. Some irrelevant content.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a sufficient breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates a conceptual understanding of some specialised areas. Presents an evaluation of findings from a range of sources in order to draw some valid conclusions.
Interprets some complex matters and ideas but with descriptive passages evident which lack clear purpose.
Demonstrates creativity in places.
Demonstrates sufficient problem- solving skills and initiative.
Provides some reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. Some relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Some weaknesses in referencing technique. Writing style is occasionally not appropriate for the assessment.
Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent, but may pose minor difficulties for the reader. Some paragraphs may lack structure, and there is limited linking and signposting. Some appropriate vocabulary is used The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.
Adequately structured.
Inclusion of some figures, tables and images but not all clear, relevant and/or referred to.
Borderline
Fail35% - 39% Work addresses some of the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.
One or more learning outcomes have not been met. Demonstrates a lack of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates Insufficient conceptual understanding of specialised areas. Presents a limited evaluation of findings from set sources.
Descriptive or narrative passages evident which lack clear purpose.
Demonstrates little creativity.
Demonstrates insufficient problem- solving skills and initiative.
Provides limited reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. Sources selected are limited and lack validity/relevance.
Poor referencing technique employed. Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment. Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear in places. Paragraphs are poorly structured. For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.
Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not clear, relevant and/or referred to.
Fail
<34% Work does not address the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.
One or more learning outcomes have not been met. Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates Insufficient conceptual understanding of relevant areas. Analysis is weak and poorly constructed with inadequate sources drawn upon.
Demonstrates little or no creativity.
Demonstrates a lack of problem- solving skills and initiative.
Provides inadequate reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. An absence of relevant sources selected and drawn upon.
Poor referencing technique employed. Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question.
Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear. Unstructured paragraphs. For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.
Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not clear, relevant and/or referred to.
WINC University of Bolton
Research Proposal
BMP6025 Dissertation Semester 1
Put your Name here Student ID
8-20-2022
4681319000
Bolton Business School BSc Top-Up
Dissertation
BMP6025
HE6
40
Research Proposal Portfolio
Student Number: 1234567
Student Signature:Print your name / Add imageDate:20-Aug-22 Word Count: Table of Content Click on the table to update once you finish writing your proposal
Contents
TOC o "1-3" h z u Student Signature: PAGEREF _Toc111023294 h 2Print your name / Add image PAGEREF _Toc111023295 h 2Date: PAGEREF _Toc111023296 h 21.Research Title PAGEREF _Toc111023297 h 42.Research Background / Introduction PAGEREF _Toc111023298 h 43.Problem Statement PAGEREF _Toc111023299 h 44.Research Aim PAGEREF _Toc111023300 h 45.Research Objectives PAGEREF _Toc111023301 h 46.Research Questions PAGEREF _Toc111023302 h 47.Research Rationale / Significance PAGEREF _Toc111023303 h 48.Justification of Choice PAGEREF _Toc111023304 h 49.Review of Literature PAGEREF _Toc111023305 h 410.Research Methodology PAGEREF _Toc111023306 h 510.1 Research Methods & Techniques (+references) PAGEREF _Toc111023307 h 510.1.1 Research Approaches PAGEREF _Toc111023308 h 510.1.2 Research Choices PAGEREF _Toc111023309 h 510.1.3Research Strategies PAGEREF _Toc111023310 h 510.1.4Data Collection Methods PAGEREF _Toc111023311 h 510.1.5Sampling technique and Size PAGEREF _Toc111023312 h 511.Project Plan PAGEREF _Toc111023313 h 512.Identifying Ethical Issues PAGEREF _Toc111023314 h 5Reference List PAGEREF _Toc111023315 h 6
Research Title (One sentence)
Research Background / Introduction
(200-250 words) 1-1.5 page (+references)
Problem Statement
(500 words / core focus on the actual problem in a real-life Org) (+references)
Research Aim (goal / purpose) x 1 (2-3 sentences maximum)
Research Objectives
x 3-4 Number your objectives
Research Questions
x 3-4 Number your Questions
Research Rationale / Significance
Discuss why this topic is important / Implications (half a page around 150 words) (Optional +references)
Justification of Choice
Why did YOU choose THIS TOPIC Only / Personal or Professional interest >> The researcher has been. . . . (1 paragraph around 75-100 words)
Review of Literature
(brief) 2-3 pages 700-800 words (+references)
Research Methodology
1 Research Methods & Techniques (+references)Explain what do you understand by research methods and methodology. (+references)
10.1.1 Research Approaches
Which approach will you use and why? (+references)
10.1.2 Research Choices
Which choice / methods will you use and why? (+references)
Research Strategies
Which strategy will you use and why? (+references)
Data Collection Methods
What methods of data collection will you employ? (+references)
Sampling technique and Size
What is the size of population? What is selected sample size? Which technique will be used for sampling and why? (+references)
(overview) (1-1.5 Page)
Project Plan
(illustrative Diagram / table / chart (Gantt) Main milestones + Dates (Should start from July 22- Dec22)
Identifying Ethical Issues(1 page + references)
Ethical Approval Form (RE1) Upload on Moodle Link separately:
https://moodle.bolton.ac.uk/mod/assign/view.php?id=2124266
Reference List
