Cause Marketing Campaign Analysis
- University :
Australian university Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Cause Marketing Campaign Analysis
To maintain academic integrity and ensure the originality of your work, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Original Work:
Proper Citation:Follow the APA citation guidelines
Avoid Plagiarism:
Introduction
Select a cause-marketing campaign that addresses a social or environmental issue(preferably an award-winning and/or well-known campaign). Eg. SAVE OUR TIGERS Campaign
Prepare a 10-slide presentation to analyse and evaluate the effectiveness of the campaign in meeting business and social objectives. Utilise the following structure:
Slide 1: Title Slide
Title: Analysis of [Campaign Name]
Slide 2: General Background of the Campaign
Provide an overview of the chosen cause marketing campaign.
Briefly describe the social or environmental issue the campaign aims to address.
Include campaign details, a timeline, and any significant achievements.
Slide 3: Overall Business and Social Objectives
Discuss the business objectives of the campaign (e.g., brand awareness, sales impact, corporate social responsibility).
Explain the social objectives (e.g., raising awareness, behavioural change, societal impact).
Slide 4: Target Participant and Beneficiary Audiences
Identify and describe the primary target audience the campaign aims to engage.
Highlight the beneficiaries of the campaign's efforts (e.g., communities, organisations, specific demographics).
Slide 5: Analysis of the 4Ps for the Campaign
Product
Analyse the product or service associated with the cause.
Discuss how the product or service is aligned with the campaign's cause and objectives.
Price
Evaluate the pricing strategy utilised (if applicable) and its impact on the campaign's success.
Discuss any financial models, donations, or contribution structures.
Place
Describe the distribution channels or platforms used for the campaign.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the chosen channels in reaching the target audience.
Promotion
Assess the promotional tactics employed by the campaign (e.g., advertising, social media, events).
Analyse the message, tone, and creative aspects of the promotional materials.
Slides 69: Detailed Analysis
Each slide focuses on a specific P (Product, Price, Place, Promotion).
Include data, graphs, or visuals to support your analysis.
Provide the strengths and weaknesses observed in each area.
Slide 10: Recommendations for Improvement
Provide actionable recommendations on how the campaign could enhance both social impact and business outcomes.
Suggest changes or strategies for each of the 4Ps.
Justify recommendations with reasoning based on the campaign's current performance.
Conclusion Slide
Summarise key findings and recommendations.
Reinforce the significance of aligning business objectives with social impact in cause marketing campaigns.
References Slide
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 1: Title Slide (2 marks) 2to >1.8pts
Full Marks
Clear, concise title; includes campaign name 1.8to >1.5pts
Good Marks
Title includes campaign name; may lack clarity 1.5to >1.2pts
Partial Marks
Title is present but lacks clarity and key elements
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 2: General Background (3 marks) 3to >2.0pts
Full Marks
Comprehensive overview with campaign details 2to >1.5pts
Good Marks
Adequate overview; lacks some details 1.5to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Overview provided with missing details or clarity
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 3: Objectives (3 marks) 3pts
Full Marks
Clearly articulated business and social objectives 3to >1.5pts
Good Marks
Objectives mentioned with clarity 1.5to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Objectives mentioned but lack some clarity
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 4: Target Audiences (3 marks) 3to >2.0pts
Full Marks
Clear identification and description of audiences 2to >1.5pts
Good Marks
Adequate identification; limited description 1.5to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Identification present but description is limited
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 5: 4Ps Analysis (5 marks) 5to >4.0pts
Full Marks
In-depth analysis of each P with supporting data 4to >2.5pts
Good Marks
Adequate analysis; may lack depth 2.5to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Basic analysis; lacks depth and supporting data
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides 6-9: Detailed Analysis (8 marks) 8to >6.0pts
Full Marks
Comprehensive analysis with strengths and weaknesses 6to >4.0pts
Good Marks
Adequate analysis; some depth lacking 4to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Analysis lacks depth and clarity
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide 10: Recommendations (4 marks) 4to >3.0pts
Full Marks
Actionable recommendations for each P with justification 3to >2.0pts
Good Marks
Recommendations provided; lacks some depth 2to >0.5pts
Partial Marks
Basic recommendations; lacks justification
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion Slide (2 marks) 2to >1.8pts
Full Marks
Summarises key findings and recommendations 1.8to >1.5pts
Good Marks
Summarises findings but lacks clarity 1.5to >1.2pts
Partial Marks
Summary provided; lacks significant details
Submission Instructions:
Suggested word count: 1500 words (flexible).
[Bullet presentation in slide and description if required in notes section]