COURSE/UNIT INFORMATION
1466851373505
COURSE/UNIT INFORMATION
Course SCQF LEVEL 11 EXTENDED DIPLOMA IN STRATEGIC BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Course Level Extended Diploma
Module Name Accounting for Next Generation Leaders
Awarding Body SCQF/SQA
Module Code HX4204
Faculty Turnitin ID 31634611
Enrolment Key USW1010
ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Full/ Part Assignment Full
Assignment brief IV by Dr.Vivek Mohan
Assessor Assignment due date TO BE FILLED BY THE STUDENT
Student Name Student ID Email ID Date Submitted
Your assignment should meet the following requirements.
Please confirm this by ticking the boxes before submitting your assignment
I have filled the student Information columns above.
The contents of my assignment have been submitted to Turnitin and I have attached the Turnitin report
I have strictly followed Harvard Referencing Style and Citations.
ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK
TO BE FILLED BY THE ASSESSOR
Assessment type Marks Marks Awarded
Introduction Profiles of Organizations selected 10 Application of Financial & Management Accounting Principles and Core Finance Strategies to measure Bottom Line Impact and Decision Making. 25 Relevance of Budgets in driving Organizational Performance. 25 Ratio Analysis & Performance Review. 25 Investment Appraisal Techniques. 15 Overall Score 100 Overall Marks achieved
GRADE ACHIEVED Summative Feedback by Assessor for further improvement
Comments for REDO submission(If applicable)
GRADE DESCRIPTORS
70% and above
(Distinction ) The assignment evaluated is of a high to exemplary standard. The work addresses clearly and articulately the assignment requirements and thus meets, and satisfies all the learning outcomes (either well or in an exemplary way). The work demonstrates: clear knowledge; references to appropriate academic literature; analysis; critical evaluation; and originality of argument. It is structured and presented to a high (or exemplary) standard. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
60 to 69%
(Merit) The assignment evaluated is of a good to a high standard. Substantial knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. Arguments presented are clear and focussed with a logical structure in place. There is clear evidence of critical evaluation of a wide range of theories/perspectives from academic literature and some independent thought. The work is well-written and addresses well all of the learning outcomes. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
50 to 59%
(Pass) The assignment evaluated is of a fair to good standard. Adequate knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. The arguments presented have a logical structure and show some critical evaluation in places, although there may be limited evidence of an independent perspective. There is evidence of some good engagement with some of the appropriate literature. Learning outcomes have been largely met and to an appropriate degree. Referencing conventions are observed.
40 to 49%
(Fail/Redo) The assignment evaluated is of a basic standard. The arguments presented have some logical structure and are supported by academic literature in most cases. The academic literature used is outside of the suggestions made in the module guide but remains limited. Little critical evaluation is evident, and the work tends more widely towards a descriptive style. Learning outcomes have been addressed in a basic but satisfactory way. Referencing conventions are mostly observed.
Fail Grades
30 to 39%
(Module retake) The assignment evaluated is of a limited standard. Limited use of academic literature and as such knowledge and argument is very weak. A simple descriptive style with no evidence of critical evaluation throughout. Over-reliance on simplistic, limited sources. Referencing conventions may not be observed. Some learning outcomes met but in a weak and simplistic way. The work is needs to be developed in greater depth and detail to move to a passable standard at this level of study
29% and Below
(Module retake) The assignment evaluated is of an unacceptable standard. There is little or no evidence of knowledge and understanding that is required at this level. Referencing is inadequate or non-existent. The learning outcomes have not been addressed fully and the work requires significant modification to bring it to a passable standard.
Module Learning Outcomes
LO.1 Critically analyse Financial Accounting Principles to measure Bottom Line impact and develop competitive strategies.
LO.2 Critique the relevance and significance of Budgeting Process, Techniques and Methods in driving Organizational Performance.
LO.3 Evaluate Financial Statements and business performance using Ratio Analysis.
LO.4 Evaluate investment appraisal techniques to support decision-making.
Expectations
Materials Access
All learning materials are provided in the form of a module kit and can be accessed from the Learning Management system (LMS)
Learning Hours
Students need to be aware of their commitment requirements in regard to study time. In order to give you an indication of that, we have based the following information on the United Kingdom (UK) Higher Education Quality Assurance Agency guidelines. The notional learning hours associated with qualifications, programmes and individual units of study are based on a broad agreement across institutions that students can expect to spend 10 hours learning on average in order to gain one academic credit unit (QAA 2006).
Re-sit
If you do not secure a pass, please read closely the feedback and speak with your Course leader(s) or faculty. After consulting the feedback, close attention is essential to rework on the areas of weakness, and then resubmit the work at the next opportunity. As per the QAA requirements, only one REDO is allowed where the marks will be capped at a Pass.
Plagiarism
All forms of plagiarism are taken seriously, and any suspected cases will be investigated thoroughly. If a case is found proven then the work will be graded as a fail and the case will be reviewed by the academic committee.
Student appeals
There are no re-evaluations as the marks are graded and internally verified before release. However, as per our appeals policy, a student can make an appeal to the course leader which will be then reviewed by the academic committee (please check our academic policies and procedures manual for more information)
Assignment submission extensions
Students can apply for extensions via the LMS based on extenuating circumstances (if any) with evidence (proof) as per our extensions policy
General Guidelines
Complete the To be filled by the student section in the cover page
All assignments must be submitted as an electronic document in MS word via the LMS (Use 12 Times New Roman script with 1.5 spacing between lines)
The results are declared only if the student has met the mandatory attendance requirement of 75% and/or minimum 50 % under extenuating circumstances approved and ratified by the academic committee and the examination board
The assignment should not contain any contents with references cited from websites such as ukessays.com, styudymode.com, slideshare.net, scribd.com, Wikipedia but should contain references/citations from credible academic journal and articles.
Submit the assignment in MS word document with the file name being:
First Name Last Name _ Module Code
Example: John Smith_GM701
ASSIGNMENT Accounting for Next Generation Leaders
Learning Outcome 1: Critically analyze Financial Accounting Principles to measure Bottom Line impact and develop competitive strategies.
PC 1.1: Evaluate the financial and operational performance of an organization
PC 1.2: Critically review the influence of Accounting Standards and Accounting Policies in a financial and (macro) economic environment.
PC 1.3: Critically discuss financial accounting and management accounting practices that highlight the use/ misuse of financial data.
PC 1.4: Discuss how a plan and execution strategy can ensure competitive financial management.
Learning Outcome 2: Critique the relevance and significance of Budgeting Process, Techniques and Methods in driving Organizational Performance.
PC 2.1: Critically analyze the relevance of Traditional Budgets versus new age Alternative Budgeting Types and Techniques.
PC 2.2: Conceptualize the budgeting approaches required to link performance management to improved operational planning and management strategies.
PC 2.3: Apply Smart Technologies in Budgeting, Forecasting and Management Control Processes to investigate performance management issues.
Learning Outcome 3: Evaluate Financial Statements and business performance using Ratio Analysis.
PC 3.1: Apply Ratio Analysis to interpret the historic business performance of your chosen organization
PC 3.2: Critically discuss how forefront developments or disruptions in the external operating environment have impacted the financial performance of your chosen organization.
PC 3.3: Evaluate future strategies for financial changes that will improve organizational sustainability.
Learning Outcome 4: Evaluate investment appraisal techniques to support decision-making.
PC 4.1: Critically discuss the importance of investment appraisal techniques when approving capital expenditure investment proposals.
PC 4.2: Conduct discounted and non discounted flow analysis.
PC 4.3: Evaluate at least two investment appraisal techniques and apply them to your chosen organization.
Assignment Task: Read the following Scenario and prepare a Formal Business & Financial Review Document with the guidelines provided.
Assignment 100 Marks [6000 Words ( +/- 10%)
Scenario:
The assignment below will help you to review and critically analyse financial and management accounting principles, relevant accounting standards/ policies applicable, and apply the relevant knowledge to evaluate the overall business and management performance based on the current complex, volatile, competitive and uncertain economic/business environment by reviewing associated implications [restructuring, consolidation, acquisitions, cost management strategies, disposal of assets, innovations & impact of technological disruptions] within businesses.
You are required to present a Formal Business & Financial Review Document, that would contain a neatly designed Table of Contents to capture the main and sub-topics in an orderly fashion which should adhere to meeting the assessment standards and grading criterion:
Introduction: Choose a public listed corporation related to your current work domain or preferred area of industry. This section would require candidates to research relevant financial and operational performance of the organization by reviewing and understanding the 2018 & 2019 Annual Reports on the chosen public listed company. The facts and figures will help the candidate to answer below questions, and validate with relevant statistics.
Introduce the organization in the context of prevailing macro-economic and business conditions by discussing the vision, mission and planning strategies of the company. For the chosen organizations, evaluate the financial and operational performance of the organizations by reviewing the companys annual performance (read through annual report for the year 2018 and 2019 for specific data) [10 marks].
Application of theory to practice [600 to 1200 words]: Demonstrate meaningful understanding of accounting policies and accounting standards and policies by critically reviewing academic and non-academic literature pertaining to its implications on the financial and macro-environment. Critically debate the use/ misuse of financial data in the practice of management accounting and financial accounting. With respect to Accounting Standard, students are required to present arguments and provide a meaningful explanation of Accounting Standards.
Discuss as how a plan and execution can lead to effective financial management in the chosen company. [25 marks].
Ratio Analysis & Financial Interpretations [2000 words]: For the question below, in addition to the chosen organization above, also select a competitor organization for the chosen company. Financial data for FY 2018 and 2019 for both the organizations will be used here.
Calculate two ratios each for liquidity, profitability, activity, capital structure and growth which should be critically interpreted and evaluated by comparing each ratio between the chosen and the competitor organization. Interpret each calculated ratio for both the organizations and comment on their business performance.
The interpretation should be supported with the critical analysis of the macro developments with impact of external operating environment on the performance of the organizations. Evaluate and recommend future strategies which will improve organizational sustainability. [25 marks].
Literature Review on Budgeting Practices [1700 words]: Carry out a critical analysis which exhibits a suitable understanding of current issues/concepts that are relevant for investigating existing practices of Traditional Budgets versus Modern Age types of alternative budgeting and techniques in large corporations.
Identify & contextualize budgeting approaches which lead to enhancing operational performance by linking these to the overall operational strategies & decision-making within large corporations.
Also, necessary critical debates must be produced to review the impact of smarter technologies in the overall budgeting processes when examining forecasting and management control processes. [25 marks].
Investment Appraisal Techniques [700 words]: If you were a Director of a public listed company and had to present a significantly high value capital expenditure proposal to the CEO, how would you critically evaluate investment appraisal techniques that remain important when seeking an approval from the CEO.
Any capital expenditure involves protecting shareholder interests & maintaining a careful balance between risk and rewards, using the concept of time value of money, to study the impact of choices between discounted cash flows and non-discounted cash flow methods. Conduct a discounted and non-discounted cash flow analysis.
You are required to apply necessary knowledge and understanding when examining investment appraisal techniques to suggest, recommend and evaluate at least two popular investment appraisal techniques that can be used & considered by managers/decision-makers in the light of dynamic business & economic conditions. Examples can be used to support the explanations. [15 marks].
Presentation & References: You should present the whole document in methodical manner and should remain aligned to appropriately demonstrate correct application of the Harvard Referencing System (HRS).
Performance Descriptors
Performance descriptors indicate how marks will be arrived at against each of the above criteria. The descriptors indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.
Assess- ment Criteria (70-100%)
Work of an outstanding, excellent & v. good standard (*) (60-69%)
Work of a good standard. (50-59%)
Work of a pass standard. D (40-49%)
Fail E (0-39%)
Fail
Introduction & Financial Accounting Principles and alignment of strategies to measure Bottom Line impact.
(35%) Assignment produces an excellent factual analysis of companies operational and financial performance by reviewing the relevant Annual Reports which presents necessary accounting and management decisions in a well explained manner to present its significance, by draw comparisons across peer group companies within the segment. Additionally domain specific industry reports are reviewed to narrate current macro-economic events which provide and propose reasons for changes with comparisons by stating means of improvement futuristic goals.
Excellent understanding demonstrated to critically examining judgements and estimates used for arriving at preparation of Financial Statements, along with review of key financial metrics on the strength of financial notes, accounting standards to assess the impact and review appropriate financial strategies Assignment produces accurate & relevant information to evidence and support factual analysis of companies operational and financial performance by reviewing the relevant Annual Reports which produced accurate accounting and management decisions ,that have been reasonably explained as to their share its significance, draw comparisons within the segment. Additionally domain specific industry reports have been reviewed to capture the current macro-economic events in a satisfying manner to provide and propose reasons for changes with comparisons by stating means of improvement futuristic goals.
Good understanding demonstrated to critically examining judgements and estimates used for arriving at preparation of Financial Statements, along with review of key financial metrics on the strength of financial notes, accounting standards to assess the impact and review appropriate financial strategies. Grammar & spelling accurate and fluent. Thoughts and views clearly expressed. Presentation is orderly and of good standards, minor syntax errors sighted. Assignment produces a fairly good narrative to support factual analysis of companies operational and financial performance by reviewing the relevant company websites & Wikipedia sources in a limited manner to produce necessary details of accounting and management decisions , which have reasonably explained as to demonstrate its significance, but a bit inconsistent, when drawing comparisons within the segment. Some errors spotted in grammar and syntax
Fairly reasonable understanding demonstrated when commenting on judgements and estimates used to review the preparation of Financial Statements, along with examining key financial metrics on the strength of financial notes, accounting standards to assess the impact and review appropriate financial strategies. Some inconsistencies in grammar & syntax observed. Assignment produces a poor review in support of factual data analysis with respect to companys operational and financial performance. Evidence presented is of limited manner in not reviewing necessary Annual Reports to produce required details of accounting and management decisions .Explanations are in a language that is not fluent to contain inaccurate grammar Some errors & inconsistencies sighted in information produced.
Presentation is poor in structure relevant concepts when reviewing the judgements and estimates and includes errors in grammar and syntax. Not very coherent as language is inconsistent. Assignment fails to provide any significant review to support factual data analysis with respect to companys operational and financial performance. Structure, language grammar and presentation of information is not of an acceptable standard including faulty syntax.
Purpose of the analysis to present necessary views and opinions on judgements and estimated presented in poor and disorderly manner. Language is unclear and incorrect usage of grammar and syntax.
Ratio Analysis & Financial Interpretations
(25%) Assignment produces an excellent analysis of the companys performance which includes relevant ratios , which have been explained as to their role, comparisons provided and proposed reasons for changes, differences with comparisons and means of improvement
Assignment produces a very good analysis of the companys performance which includes most of the relevant ratios , explanations of their roles, comparisons, proposed reasons for change, differences with comparisons and means of improvement
Assignment produces an analysis of the companys performance which is based on a sufficient number of the relevant ratios , explanations of their roles, comparisons and proposed reasons for change, differences with comparisons and means of improvement Assignment produces a limited analysis of the companys performance which misses some of the key elements and supporting detail.
Assignment produces a limited analysis of the companys performance which misses most of the key elements and supporting detail.
Relevance of Budgeting in driving Organizational Performance
(25%) Assignment produces a clear and concise critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the current budgetary process. This analysis recognises changing economic environments, weakness with traditional budgeting processes and proposals for changes. Excellent clarity of expression. Consistent/ accurate use of grammar and spelling using an academic writing style. Presentation standard of the assignment is excellent; consistent with academic protocol. Referencing clear, relevant and consistently accurate using the Harvard system
Assignment produces a clear and concise analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the current budgetary process. This analysis recognises some of the issues around the changing economic environments, weakness with traditional budgeting processes Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate and fluent. Presentation overall of good standard with few errors in grammar and syntax. Referencing relevant and mostly accurate using the Harvard system.
Assignment produces an analysis of some the strengths and weaknesses of the current budgetary process. This analysis recognises some of the issues around the changing economic environments, weakness with traditional budgeting processes. Presentation has limitations including some errors in grammar and syntax Minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing using the Harvard system
Assignment produces an analysis of a few the strengths and weaknesses of the current budgetary process. This analysis fails to recognise the main issues around the changing economic environments, weakness with traditional budgeting processes. Meaning apparentbut language not always fluent, grammar and spelling is often inaccurate.
Presentation is poor in structure and includes errors in grammar and syntax. Referencing present having many inconsistenciesand inaccuracies Assignment fails to produce an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the current budgetary process. This analysis fails to recognise the main issues around the changing economic environments, weakness with traditional budgeting processes. Purpose andmeaning of assignment unclear.Language, grammarand spelling poor. Structure and presentation is not of an acceptable standard including faulty grammar and syntax. Referencing mainly inaccurate or absent
Investment Appraisal Technique
(15%) Excellent Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenges and inherent difficulties in decision-making process whilst approving Capital Expenditure Proposals.
Harvard Referencing System followed in a systematic and accurate manner
Suitable recommendations on ideal investment appraisal techniques, post reviewing each technique considers merits c time value of money concept , cash flows to distinctly clarify positions on risks versus rewards, rate of return, to be well supported with empirical evidence when contemplating on long term decision-making . Sound Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenges and inherent difficulties in decision-making process whilst approving Capital Expenditure Proposals.
Errors in Harvard Referencing, along with minor flaws grammar and syntax observed.
Suitable recommendations post reviewing each investment appraisal methods considering time value of money concept clarifies positions on risks versus rewards, rate of return, is well supported with empirical evidence to support long term decision-making. Reasonably Good Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenging and inherent difficulties in decision-making of Capital Expenditure Proposals.
Limited Harvard Referencing & recommendations are placed post reviewing each investment appraisal methods to support long term decision-making.
Errors in Grammar and syntax
The purpose of this task does not meet acceptable standards. Lack of Academic debates sighted. Limited understanding exhibited with poor language carrying confused meaning and no structure or pattern followed when discussing the relevant investment appraisal techniques. Poor Grammar and syntax errors observed
Recommendations are not in line with the academic thinking to support investment appraisal techniques for supporting long term decision-making. The information placed fails to meet desired expected standard. Language, structure and presentation of thoughts are not fluent and is unclear. Poor use of grammar and syntax
(START WRITING YOUR ANSWER FROM THE NEXT PAGE)
