Covid-19 Issues and Management Policy:Literature Review

Literature Review

The COVID-19 pandemic raises significant challenges for global public policy. Everyone in the globe has been impacted by COVID-19, including the government, yet Australia handled the matter brilliantly.Australia has created, implemented, and evaluated public programme to lessen the pandemic's consequences. By carefully examining five key sources, this literature review assesses the governmental actions taken in Australia during the COVID-19 outbreak.

The article "Fault Lines: An Independent Review into Australia's Response to Covid-19" by Peter Sheepfold et al. offers a thorough analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of Australia's public policy response to the pandemic. Strong leadership and cooperation between the federal, state, and territorial administrations are two of the reaction's major advantages, according to the research. In- depth analysis of Australia's reaction to the pandemic by Peter Sheepfold et al. revealed outstanding leadership and coordination across the federal, state, and territorial governments as well as increased public outreach and openness. The text emphasizes responsibility and transparency in respect to the duties performed by various levels of government. One of the report's most outstanding features is the way it uses evidence to support its claims. Inadequacies include the lack of pandemic preparedness and the challenges controlling epidemics in residential care institutions are also discussed in the study. The analysis emphasizes the need for increased infrastructure expenditure to improve public health and pandemic preparation.

Daniel Halperin and colleagues piece "Revisiting COVID-19 policies" offers suggestions for potential future public policy solutions to the epidemic. The study emphasises the need of vaccination campaigns, early outbreak detection, and monitoring mechanisms to track the virus development. The essay also highlights how important it is to deal with the social and economic implications of the pandemic, to raise awareness of the issue, and to consider public health when making decisions. The article's major claim is that government efforts must promote population health maintenance and be founded on the most recent scientific data in order to be successful. Additionally, it asserts that students' well being and education are impacted by the necessity of their remote work. Since they spent the entire day seated in front of screens, unable to move around, and unable to interact with others, students were having difficulties because they needed to move online but couldn't see anyone. This had an impact on their social, physical, and emotional wellbeing Duc to their inability to work, which will have a financial impact and make it more difficult to buy needs, this also has an effect on parents. The essay also underlines the significance of addressing the socioeconomic determinants of health, such as income, education, and housing, in order to prevent disadvantaged people from being disproportionately affected by the pandemic.

The Menzies Health Centre's Report on Health Equity during the epidemic provides an assessment of how the epidemic affected health equity in Australia. The epidemic has reportedly had a disproportionately negative impact on disadvantaged groups, including Australian Indigenous people, those with impairments, and people from low socioeconomic origins. The Menzies Health Centre identified a number of crucial areas where public policy may improve health equality in their study on bealth equity during the pandemic, including tackling socioeconomic determinants of health and ensuring access to screening and treatment. The importance of public health policy in ensuring that all Australians have access to first-rate medical treatment and related services is also emphasized. The importance of including underrepresented groups in decision-making is also stressed in the book.

The Human Rights Commission has offered their viewpoint on the topic of protecting human rights in Australia during the epidemic. The need of having laws and regulations that protect the rights of all Australian citizens, including those who are detained, relocated, or who are applying for asylum, is emphasised throughout the Commission's recommendations. The Human Rights Commission has urged the government to protect the right to an education, take the pandemic's detrimental impacts on mental health into account, rely on evidence-based research, and be open about its decision- making. The Commission has emphasised the need of relying on research that is supported by data and open decision-making. The Commission summarises the HRC's worries in a single pamphlet, focusing on the need to protect human rights in the face of a public health emergency, the pandemic's effects on disadvantaged groups, and the demand for more transparency in decision- making.

The responses of Australian residents to the COVID-19 issue are extensively covered in these five key sources. Although Australia's strategy has many commendable aspects, there are a number of areas where it could be improved Health fairness and the protection of human rights need to be given more thought. These articles provide evidence-based recommendations for potential public policy responses to pandemics, highlighting the necessity of taking socioeconomic health elements into consideration and avoiding unfairly burdening developing countries. These suggestions can help decision-makers come up with more practical and fair answers to COVID-19-related problems.