Criteria and Weight Outstanding- HD Excellent-D Very good-C Acceptable-P Unacceptable F
Criteria and Weight Outstanding- HD Excellent-D Very good-C Acceptable-P Unacceptable F
Describe and discuss 2 key moments in detail and reflect how;
thoughts, beliefs, values, knowledge or assumptions were challenged or enhanced
Kember et als (2008) critical reflection level of reflective writing is evident
60% Exceptional insight and understanding of Cultural safety and how thoughts, beliefs, values, knowledge or assumptions were challenged or enhanced
Exceptional, insightful and highly relevant discussion
Demonstrates outstanding critical reflection using Kembers model
Excellent insight and understanding of Cultural safety and how thoughts, beliefs, values, knowledge or assumptions were challenged or enhanced
Insightful and highly relevant discussion
Demonstrates excellent critical reflective writing
Good insight to convey a developing understanding of Cultural safety.
Most areas covered to show how thoughts, beliefs, values, knowledge or assumptions were challenged or enhanced.
Demonstrates adequate reflective writing but lacks consistent critical reflection Briefly and/or superficially conveys a limited understanding of Cultural safety and responsiveness
Limited discussion on how thoughts, values, beliefs, knowledge or assumptions were challenged or enhanced.
Limited reflective writing
Lacks critical reflection Insufficient analysis to convey understanding of the Cultural safety and responsiveness
Unclear and/or irrelevant content
Inadequate reflective writing
How these learning moments will influence your future clinical practice and support you to apply culturally safe practice
40% Exceptional, insightful and highly relevant discussion related to future clinical practice
Demonstrates outstanding critical reflective writing
Excellent, insightful and highly relevant discussion related to future clinical practice
Demonstrates excellent critical reflective writing Good discussion which is adequately related to future clinical practice
Demonstrates adequate reflective writing but lacks consistent critical reflection
Briefly and/or superficial discussion with limited application to future clinical practice
Limited reflective writing
Lacks critical reflection Insufficient discussion
Unclear, Irrelevant, Not related to future clinical practice
Inadequate reflective writing
Does not exceed word limit YES kept to word limit NO - exceeded word limit therefore this mark is based on the work completed up until the word limit
Writing style -this is feedback for further assignments and NOT marked. Well-structured / well written / attention to grammar and vocabulary appropriate for context /Connections and insights clear for the reader Writing style made it difficult to follow/Recommend to proofread / seek student writing support e.g. Flinders Studiosity
TOTAL Grade: Marker:
General Comments:
