Criteria Below Expectations
Criteria Below Expectations
Fail (0 49) Meets Expectations
Pass (50 59) Meets Expectations
Credit (60 69) Exceeds Expectations
Distinction (70 79) Exceeds Expectations
High Distinction (80 100)
Identification of issues: Discipline knowledge and skills standard (15%) Inadequately identifies and analyses issues and problems.
Where applicable, does not identify relevant models. Identifies and analyses the most significant issues and problems. Where applicable, identifies relevant models. Identifies and analyses issues and problems with adequate reference to the
Interrelationships among the issues.
Where applicable,
identifies relevant models. Identifies and analyses complex interrelationships among the issues and/or problems.
Where applicable,
discusses application
of relevant models. Identifies and analyses deep and complex
Inter-relationships among the issues and/or problems. Where applicable, identifies
expanded application of relevant models.
Perspective: Critical self-reflection (25%) No attempt at critical reflection and critical analysis of the results of the self-assessment exercises. Simply attaches results or describes results without reflecting on how they apply to them and how they can be used to further personal and professional development. Some attempt at critical reflection and critical analysis of the results of the self-assessment exercises. Simple reflection on how the results apply and how they can be used for further personal and professional development but the discussion lacks depth. Sufficient critical reflection and critical analysis on self-assessment exercises but not always correct in interpretation, there are some errors and the discussion fails to show interconnections between different topics. Good critical reflection and critical analysis on self-assessment exercises with sufficient details on interrelationship among topics. Insightful critical reflection and critical analysis on self-assessment exercises and is able to interweave concepts together to produce a coherent discussion. Demonstrates deep personal insight into own reactions and experiences. Discusses the learning points and implications for future in detail.
Application of Discipline knowledge; understanding of course content
(30 %) Needs greater use of course content and concepts, some concepts may be included but needs much more depth. There may also be areas of misunderstanding. Even while some interesting points are raised they need to be developed significantly. Limited use of course content, for the most part suggests description. Where course content is used may be some errors or superficial use although is aware of key issues. Answer would benefit from more depth.
Makes some reference to course content but here and there suggests a tendency to be superficial and/or may show errors in understanding. Overall, however, shows a good understanding of relevant concepts.
Refers to course content and concepts where explicitly relevant but could have drawn on other ideas to add further depth. Shows a robust understanding of course content used though in some areas may have been explained further.
Demonstrates a clear and explicit connection with course content i.e. incorporates relevant OB concepts, theories and research to analyse the results of the self-assessment exercises. Discusses managerial implications of leverage in detail. Shows understanding of both strengths and weaknesses and provides a complete plan for self-improvement.
Evidence based analysis (critical thinking standard)
(15%)
No academic sources have been cited or the information analysed is gathered from very limited academic source(s). The analysis is
superficial and based
on irrelevant information,
concepts and methods A few relevant academic sources (peer reviewed journal articles) have been cited but not always used appropriately. The analysis lacks depth and is not cohesive.
A few relevant academic sources (peer reviewed journal articles) have been cited appropriately but not synthesised in a cohesive discussion. Many relevant academic sources (peer reviewed journal articles) have been cited appropriately and synthesised to form a reasonable discussion. The discussion feels a little disjointed in some places but overall provides a good overview. A comprehensive and cohesive analysis is provided through appropriate and skilful use of many relevant academic sources (peer reviewed journal articles). Shows thorough understanding of concepts and research on topic(s) discussed.
Control of Syntax and mechanics (written communication skills standard) (10%) Did not use language that
conveys meaning to readers with sufficient clarity and includes some
errors.
Limited vocabulary, consistent errors in grammar, spelling & punctuation. Poor structure. Uses language sufficiently well to
convey basic meaning although
errors reduce
effectiveness of
communication.
Good vocabulary. Minor grammar and spelling errors. Is able to communicate the ideas. Structure is sufficient. Uses language that
generally conveys
meaning to readers
with clarity and
writing is virtually
error free.
Exhibits good academic writing skills and vocabulary. Minimal errors; good flow of argument. Well structured. Uses language that
effectively conveys
meaning to readers
with clarity. Any errors
which occur do not
reduce effectiveness
of communication.
Quality academic writing skills; OB vocabulary is evident; minimal grammatical errors; good flow of argument. Structure is professional. Uses language that
skilfully communicates
meaning to readers with
clarity and fluency, and is
error free. Excellent control of language and vocabulary.
Logically written with ideas and concepts expressed clearly and succinctly.
Overall structure is very professional
Referencing-Uses Chicago 17B referencing style accurately (5%)
No referencing has been done in the assignment
or
No in-text citations have been provided but a reference list is attached
or
In-text citations are provided but no reference list is attached. Many errors in use of Chicago 17B and/or uses a non-prescribed style/format Few errors in using Chicago 17B referencing style or some citations and references are omitted Chicago 17B referencing style is used almost perfectly with very few errors or inconsistencies Citations and references fully comply with Chicago 17B.
MGMT5022 Assessment 2: Individual Analysis: Assessing and Developing Yourself as a Manager
Structure, Assessment Criteria and Word Limit
The assignment should be structured so that it includes a brief introduction that outlines what is covered in each section. Relevant headings and sub-heading should be used in each section. The assessment criteria (marking rubric) for Assessment 2 are available on Blackboard.
While all 3 main parts of the assignment allow you to demonstrate Critical Thinking, Parts 2 and 3 provide greater scope to demonstrate Discipline Knowledge and Skills, so ensure you devote an adequate amount of the assignment to these parts. (A suggested word count only for each part is 800 words for Part 1; 1100 words for Part 2; and 800 words for Part 3. A brief introduction and conclusion should be included).
As indicated in the Assessment marking rubric, you will also be assessed on the Written Communication Skills that you demonstrate in the assignment (logically structured argument, grammar, spelling, etc.). Referencing must follow the Chicago - Curtin 17B referencing guidelines (see Library website for referencing guidelines).
The total word limit for Assessment 2 is 3,000 words (+ or 10% is acceptable). Assignments that are more than 10% over the word limit will be penalised. The word limit excludes self-assessment instrumentsincluded as appendices and the reference list.Moreover, the student are not permitted to use of GenAI (e.g., ChatGPT, Bing, Bard etc.) for any of the assessments
Details of the Assignment
This assignment focuses on some of the tools that are available for self-assessment of individual behaviours, preferences, and preferred roles in an organisational setting. This assessment is comprised of three (3) parts.
Assessment 2 Part 1: Self-Assessment using SelfAssessment Exercises
In Part 1, you are asked to examine a range of self-assessment tools available online and to undertake six self-assessment exercises (references to these tests must be included with your assignment). These may be taken from relevant online sourcesor othersources. Examples of online self-assessments will be provided on Blackboard. You may use one self-assessment you have completed previously privately or at work but the other five need to be self-assessments that you have not undertaken until this unit.
The six self-assessments must comprise: (the assessment links are attached at the end and you can choose of your choice)
Two individual behaviour and processes self-assessments.
Two team processes self-assessments.
Two organisational processes self-assessments.
Having completed the required assessments (a screenshotis to be handed in as an Appendix - such as screenshots of the front page or summary page of each test -but the tests themselves are not included in the word count), you are required to address the following in this section of the assignment:
Why you chose the particular assessments you completed were there particular areas of your behaviour you were trying to understand?
What do the selfassessments that you have completed tell you about yourself as a manager?
Based on an increased understanding of yourself, what is likely to be challenging for you as you move through your course of study and career?
What is likely to be easy for you?
Were there any surprises in the assessments you completed? That is, were the results different from what you expected?
If there were no surprises in the assessments you completed, why?
Assessment 2 Part 2: Overview of Relevant Literature
In Part 2, you are asked to relate one of the areas you have explored via the self-assessments to the relevant theoretical models and concepts covered in the OB course and to relevant current academic literature (journal articles published in the past 3-5 years).
Specifically, you are asked to review at least six (6) journal articles and to discuss the key points that are being made by the authors including the application of theory or OB concepts. You are expected to draw primarily on three or four different journals from amongst the list of relevant journals presented in Blackboard under Unit Resources (Textbook, References and other useful resources). It can be assessed through the following link:
https://curtin.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/readinglist/lists/14554465650001951(to access the link use the following:
Curtin ID: 21367236
Password: Yakpogangpa1983)
The aim is to connect what you have learned about yourself in Part 1 to the relevant literature. You are trying to understand more about the current debates/discussion relating to your area of interest. For example, if you have chosen a number of self-assessments that relate to leadership you should examine current academic literature that explores one area or aspect of leadership that is of most interest to you. For instance, you might want to focus on leadership effectiveness, or characteristics of effective leaders, or the impact of leadership styles etc.
As a conclusion, you should comment on any additional insights you have gained as a result of the articles you have read and relate it to areas that you want to develop in order to increase your effectiveness as a manager. Please note you may consider the discussion of a topic such as leadership or teamwork but it is not a literature review of the history of the actual self-assessments.
Assessment 2 Part 3: Applications and Limitations
In Part 3 you are expected to provide comment on the application and limitation of self-assessment tools such as those you have used and to link your comments back to the literature you have reviewed in Part 2 and other relevant academic literature (e.g. your textbook).
You should comment on the following areas:
Limitations of self-assessment tools in general.
Cultural implications regarding the self-assessment tools.
How and when you might use these tools in your organisation.
The usefulness of the self-assessments you have completed with respect to your own development.
What you will do differently (if anything) as a result of these self-assessments and how you might monitor if the changes you want to make are working.
Any reservations you have about the particular tools you used.
Anything else that you feel is relevant.
.
Links to self-assessments
There are some self-assessments in your text book that you can use for this assessment; please check relevant chapters to find the assessments. Examples include:
Personality: The Big Five
Communication: Impression Management Check
Leadership: Leadership style preferences
Here are some links for individual level assessments:
Personality and Values Self-assessments
Big 5 personality assessment: https://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/Hexaco personality inventory: https://survey.ucalgary.ca/jfe/form/SV_0icFBjWwyHvJOfADark triad inventory: https://darkfactor.org/
Values Inventory Assessment (character strength): https://www.viacharacter.org/character-strengths-viaLearning
VARK Questionnaire_How Do I learn best (online quiz): https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/VARK quiz pdf with instructions for manual calculation: included separately in the folder.
Perception and Implicit Bias
Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT): https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.htmlSelf-perception_Johari Window: Johari window (pdf included separately in the folder)
Some other individual level tests
Self-esteem test: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/RSE.phpEmotional Intelligence: http://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.htmCreativity: https://www.mindtools.com/a57l978/how-creative-are-you
Links for self-assessments at group/team level
Team roles
https://www.123test.com/team-roles-test/Belbin team roles test: pdf with instructions for calculation included separately in the folder.
Conflict handling styles:
https://psychologia.co/conflict-resolution/http://www.blake-group.com/free-assessmentsCommunication
Communication style: https://www.leadershipiq.com/blogs/leadershipiq/39841409-quiz-whats-your-communication-styleHow good are your communication skills: https://www.mindtools.com/a3y5cte/how-good-are-your-communication-skillsCommunication style quiz: pdf included separately in the folder.
Links for self-assessments at organisational level
Preference to organisational structure self-assessment: Quiz + Instructions for score calculation (included separately in this folder)
Preference to organisational culture self-assessment: Quiz + Instructions for score calculation (included separately in this folder)
The reference for both scales is: McShane, Steven, Mara Olekalns, Alex Newman, and Angela Martin. 2019. Organisational Behaviour: Emerging Knowledge. Global Insights. 6th ed. Sydney, NSW: McGraw Hill Australia. (ISBN/ISSN: 9781760421649)
Organisational culture/corporate culture preference: https://www.ocai-online.com/products/ocai-one
Tolerance to change: https://www.quia.com/sv/551724.html
Leadership style: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_50.htmLeadership legacy: http://www.yourleadershiplegacy.com/assessment/assessment.phpHow inclusive are you as a leader: https://www.harvardbusiness.org/insight/assess-how-inclusive-are-you-as-a-leader/
