Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectation

Assessment 3 Reflection

Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectation

Depth of reflection: Awareness of own performance. Provides an in-depth reflection of personal thinking, ideas and practices, demonstrating capacity to move beyond simple description, demonstrating analysis of how the experience contributed to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts. The reflection demonstrates strong connections between the experience and material from subject; past experience; and/or personal goals. Demonstrates capacity to critically analyse feedback received Provides a reflection of limited depth on personal thinking, ideas and practices, demonstrating some capacity to move beyond simple description demonstrating some analysis of how the experience contributed understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts. The reflection demonstrates some connections between the experience and material from subject; past experience; and/or personal goals. Demonstrates some capacity to analyse feedback received Provides limited or no evidence of reflection beyond a simple description, demonstrating limited capacity to self-reflect. Limited or no analysis of how the experience contributed understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts. The submission demonstrates little or no connections between the experience and material from subject; past experience; and/or personal goals. Demonstrates limited or no evidence of analysis of provided feedback received.

Use of Evidence and Sources: Relevant source are used to support reflection. Applies use of high-quality and relevant journals and or sources to justify resulting decisions, uses UOW Harvard Referencing style with no errors. Applies some use of relevant journals and sources to support and justify decisions, uses UOW Harvard Referencing style with some errors. Demonstrates insufficient reference to relevant journals and sources, using inappropriate referencing or UOW Harvard Referencing style with many errors.

Structure: Uses reflective writing structure as per assessment requirements. The language is clear and expressive. The reader can create a detailed mental picture of the situation being described. Abstract concepts are explained accurately. Explanation of concepts makes sense to an uninformed reader. Adopts reflective writing style as per assessment requirement, formatting and organisation of writing is strong. The language is mostly clear and expressive with some lapses in clarity and accuracy. The reader can create a mental picture of the situation being described. Abstract concepts are explained but not always accurately and generally make sense to an uninformed reader. Adopts reflective writing style as per assessment requirement, formatting and organisation of writing is with some lapses in clarity or accuracy. The language is mostly unclear with many lapses in clarity and accuracy. Limited or no explanation of abstract concepts. Limited or no evidence of reflective writing style as per assessment requirement, formatting and organisation of writing is with some lapses in clarity or accuracy.

Blogs: Evidence of ongoing process of reflection using blogs. Includes 4 Individual learning blogs posted by due dates, makes reference to and builds on one blog post to form the reflection essay Includes 4 individual learning blogs posted by due dates, makes limited or no reference any blogs in reflection. Includes less than 4 learning blogs posted by due dates, and/or makes no reference to any blogs in reflection.