Designing a Secure AWS Cloud Solution for Business Migration CSE305
- Subject Code :
CSE305
- University :
King Own Institute Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
Assessment 2
Assessment type: Group development project
Purpose: This assessment is a group project addressing learning outcomes c, d and e.
Value: Group work 20%; Individual contribution 10%
Due Date: Week 11
Submission: Submit the completed report on Moodle. Students need to submit an individual report consist of a reflection journal and a weekly activity log.
This assessment will be done in groups of three (3) students. Students in each group will work to design and develop AWS security solution for a company that wants to migrate to the cloud. Students are required to find a case study about some company and describe the motivations to migrate their applications and data to the cloud. However, there are some security challenges due to data security and privacy. Students are required to introduce the company business functions, explain about companys data and applications and setup the cloud solutions using AWS security services (e.g. firewalls, security groups, IAM, encryption, etc.) to address the security challenges.
The case study of the project must be finalised in week 5 by each group.
Each group must write a technical report of 1500 words about the security solution. Each group also needs to present their project. Each presentation will be 10 minutes long, including questions and answers. Each of the group members will present their achievements and outcomes. The presentations will be in week 12.
Each group member is required to fill up the individual contribution weekly form starting from week 5 to highlight the individual contribution.
The structure of the report should be as follows:
- A cover page with your team details and the title of your project
- An abstract or executive summary (one page)
- Table of contents
- Problem description
- Cloud services used
- Security and Privacy challenges
- Detailed description of the security solution using AWS services)
- Conclusion, future work, plans for extension
- Appendices as necessar
The structure of the individual report should be as follows:
- Individual reflection journal on group project collaborations, problems, and lessons learnt (5 marks)
- Weekly activity log must include the activities for the week 5 - Week11 (5 marks)
Marking Rubric for Assessment 2 Group Work: 20%
Criteria |
Fail (0 49%) |
Pass (50 64%) |
Credit (65 74%) |
Distinction (75 84%) |
High Distinction (85 100%) |
Developed Cloud Security Control in one |
Inadequate application and security solution |
Appropriate application and security solution |
Well-developed application and security solution |
Well-developed application and comprehensive |
Well-developed application with comprehensive |
of the cloud providers 7 marks |
using no cloud resources and services |
using limited cloud resources and services |
using appropriate cloud resources and services |
security solution using sound cloud resources and services |
security solution using extensive cloud resources and services |
Report content
3 marks |
Inadequate content and/or has not carried out sufficient research and/or the discussions about cloud technologies, and security analysis is not provided |
Content is appropriate but research is merely adequate, or the discussions about cloud technologies and security analysis of cloud resources are not complete |
Content and research is appropriate, but the discussions about cloud technologies and security analysis of cloud resources are not fully complete |
Content provided is excellent and the research is extensive, full discussions about cloud technologies and a partial security analysis of cloud resources are provided |
Content provided is excellent and the research is extensive, full discussion about cloud technologies and a full security analysis of cloud resources are provided |
Clarity and |
Organisation of |
Sufficient in terms |
Appropriate in |
Excellent in terms |
Given answer is |
presentation |
the answer does |
of clarity and |
terms of clarity and |
of clarity and |
outstanding in |
2 marks |
not give a clear |
presentation, but |
presentation, nut |
presentation and |
terms of clarity and |
message or some |
could have |
could have |
meets all |
presentation and |
|
cut and pasted? |
improved by |
improved by |
presentation |
follows all |
|
information is |
organising the |
organising the |
requirements in full |
presentation |
|
provided without |
answer in a more |
answer in more |
requirements, |
||
any flow or |
focused way with |
focused way |
provides |
||
referencing |
more discussion |
meaningful insights |
|||
Format and |
Students did not |
Report includes |
Report includes |
Report has used |
Report has used |
references |
follow the |
most of the report |
most of the report |
the requested |
the requested |
2 marks |
required format |
sections but misses |
sections but misses |
format in an |
format in a well- |
for the report or |
several of them, |
at least one |
acceptable |
organized |
|
referencing |
referencing is not in |
section, referencing |
structure, |
structure, |
|
the correct format |
generally correct |
referencing is |
referencing is |
||
on several |
format |
always in correct |
always in correct |
||
occasions |
format |
format |
|||
Project |
No demonstration given or demonstration does not summarise the report |
Poor summary of |
Adequate summary |
Succinct summary |
Succinct summary |
demonstration |
the report with |
of the report with |
of the report with |
of the report that |
|
3 marks |
limited audience |
some audience |
good audience |
fully engages the |
|
engagement |
engagement |
engagement |
audience and |
||
create a sense of |
|||||
presence, |
|||||
innovative |
|||||
demonstration |
|||||
Oral Assessment 3 marks |
Student didnt answer correctly any question |
Student answer correctly only question. |
Student answer some of the questions. |
Student answer most of the question |
Students answer all questions properly |
Total out of 20 marks. |
Comments |
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment 2 Individual Contribution: 10%
Criteria |
Fail (0 49%) |
Pass (50 64%) |
Credit (65 74%) |
Distinction (75 84%) |
High Distinction (85 100%) |
Reflection Journal 5 marks |
Reflections lack of contents or missing main contents |
Reflections on the |
Fair reflections on |
Good reflections |
Excellent reflections on the team collaborations, problems, solutions, and lesion learnt with good details and examples |
team |
the team |
on the team |
|||
collaborations, problems, solutions, and lesion learnt with |
collaborations, problems, solutions, and lesion learnt with |
collaborations, problems, solutions, and lesion learnt with |
|||
no details and no |
details or |
some details and |
|||
examples |
examples |
some examples |
|||
Attendance at weekly meetings |
Attended less than 50% of the meetings |
Attended less than 65% of the meetings |
Attended less than 75% of the meetings |
Attended less than 85% of the meetings |
Attended 85% or more of the meetings |
1 mark |
|||||
Weekly activity log 1 mark |
Provided less than 50% of the weekly logs and/or provided scant details |
Provided less than 65% of the weekly logs and/or provided incomplete details |
Provided less than 75% of the weekly logs and/or provided only basic details |
Provided less than 85% of the weekly logs and/or provided most required details |
Provided 85% or more of the weekly logs and/or provided comprehensive details |
Time management
1 mark |
Assigned tasks typically late or not completed |
Most assigned tasks completed by the deadline |
All assigned tasks completed by the deadline |
Most assigned tasks completed well in advance of deadline allowing time for revision and refinement |
All assigned tasks completed well in advance of deadline allowing time for revision and refinement |
Tasks 1 mark |
Did not complete the tasks assigned |
Completed most assigned tasks but not thorough and lacking details |
Completed most assigned tasks in detail |
Completed all assigned tasks in detail |
Completed all tasks assigned at a professional level |
Actual |
Made little or no |
Made a cursory |
Made a fair |
Made a significant |
Made a vital |
contribution to group project |
contribution to the project/report |
contribution to the project/report |
contribution to the project/report |
contribution to the project/report |
contribution to the project/report |
1 mark |
|||||
Total mark out of 10 |
Comments |
||||
