Due Date: 18/09/2022
Assessment 2: Essay (40%)
Due Date: 18/09/2022
Word count: 2000
Assessment When assessed Weighting Learning Outcomes
Assessment 2: Essay (2000 words)
Students are to compare and contrast Australian and global theoretical approaches to disablement and their implications for social policy and inclusive service delivery. You are to choose a country other than Australia and compare their understanding of disablement with that of Australia. What are the implications for both Australia and the other country for how they develop social policy and seek to include people living with disabilities in service delivery? Week 8 40% a, b
Links to relevant articles and publications:
http://www.ru.org/index.php/human-rights/315-the-history-of-disability-a-history-of-othernessDisability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models (MOODLE)
https://www.daru.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Positive-Practice-Framework-April-2018-.pdfBreak it down:
Compare What is the same or similar?
Contrast What is different?
Local Victoria Australia
Global pick 2 other places such as New Zealand, England, USA, or your country of origin.
How are people with a disability considered in society
Medical Model
Social Model
Empowerment Model
Religious Model
Social Policy
What social policies are there in the country about disability?
Social policy is concerned with the ways societies across the world meet human needs for security, education, work, health and wellbeing. Social policy addresses how states and societies respond to global challenges of social, demographic and economic change.
LINK the theories you have identified to social policy about disability.
THEN write about inclusive service delivery.
What is being delivered? This list can be added to. It is in no order of importance.
Medical Care
Day to day self-care
Education
Accommodation
Work Opportunities
SocialisingBeing part of society
Sport or other activities
Nutrition
Rehabilitation
Access to religious life
Access to the great outdoors
Do NOT utilize sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support, you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment.
How to prepare your essay:
Use a Microsoft Word Document
Use size 12 font
Write in your own words
Do not plagiarize
Use APA 7 referencing for your bibliography
Resources to help you with your assessment:
Tips for making your assessment less overwhelming: https://www.learningcommunity.us/APA 7 referencing guides (watch the video at the bottom of the page): https://www.griffith.edu.au/library/study/referencing/apa-7Help with essay structure:https://www.monash.edu/learnhq/write-like-a-pro/how-to-write.../essay/how-to-build-an-essay#tabs__2725037-01Rubric how you will be marked
left27559000
Marks
Criteria High Distinction
80%-100% Distinction
70%-79% Credit
60%-69% Pass
50%-59% Fail
0-49%
Addressing of specific topic
/30 Excellent comparison of local and global theoretical approaches
Excellent analysis of the implications of social policy and service delivery locally and globally
(24-30) Very good comparison of local and global theoretical approaches
Very good analysis of the implications of social policy and service delivery locally and globally
(21-23.9) Good comparison of local and global theoretical approaches
Good analysis of the implications of social policy and service delivery locally and globally
(18-20.9) Adequate comparison of local and global theoretical approaches
Adequate analysis of the implications of social policy and service delivery locally and globally
(15-17) Inadequate comparison of local and global theoretical approaches
Inadequate analysis of the implications of social policy and service delivery locally and globally
(0-14.9)
Knowledge: Understanding of topic
/30 Excellent understanding of the question.
Excellent evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Evidence of extensive research
(24-30) Very good understanding of the question.
Very good evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Very well researched.
(21-23.9) Good understanding of the question.
Good evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Very well researched.
(18-20.9) Adequate understanding of the question.
Adequate evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
Adequate research evident.
(15-17) Inadequate understanding of the question.
Inadequate evaluation of concepts, issues and information.
No / inadequate research evident.
(0-14.9)
Style:
Grammar and expression
/20 The writing is academically rigorous, succinct and engaging
Written in formal language.
Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated.
Excellent use of language and expression.
(16-20) The writing is predominantly academically rigorous, succinct and engaging
Predominantly written in formal language.
Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated most of the time.
Very good use of language and expression.
.(14-15.5) The writing style is inconsistent, and sometimes lacks academic rigor.
Language is sometimes informal.
Significance of examples and quotes not consistently clear.
Good use of language and expression.
(12-13.5) The writing style often lacks academic rigor.
Language is often informal.
Significance of examples and quotes is unclear.
Adequate use of language and expression.
(10-11) The writing style lacks academic rigor.
Language is consistently informal.
No or few examples or quotes used.
Inadequate use of language and expression.
(0-9)
Citations and references
/20 Excellent citations and references.
Excellent critical analysis of selected references.
(16-20) Very good citations and references.
Very good critical analysis of selected references.
(14-15.5) Good citations and references.
Good critical analysis of selected references.
(12-13.5) Adequate citations and references.
Adequate critical analysis of selected references.
(10-11) Inadequate citations and references.
No critical analysis of selected references.
(0-9)
