Early Childhood Factors and Educational Outcomes: An Analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study
Early Childhood Factors and Educational Outcomes: An Analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study
Name
Date
Table of Contents
TOC o "1-3" h z u Introduction PAGEREF _Toc165048192 h 3Background PAGEREF _Toc165048193 h 3Problem Statement PAGEREF _Toc165048194 h 4Aim of Research PAGEREF _Toc165048195 h 5Research Questions PAGEREF _Toc165048196 h 5Significance of the study PAGEREF _Toc165048197 h 5Methods PAGEREF _Toc165048198 h 6Participants PAGEREF _Toc165048199 h 6Materials PAGEREF _Toc165048200 h 6Design PAGEREF _Toc165048201 h 6Procedure PAGEREF _Toc165048202 h 6Ethical Issues PAGEREF _Toc165048203 h 7Justification of Methods PAGEREF _Toc165048204 h 7Results PAGEREF _Toc165048205 h 8References PAGEREF _Toc165048206 h 13
IntroductionBackgroundEarly childhood development is a crucial time, it builds the ground for the kids future health, well-being, and the ability to get an education. Scientific studies over decades have demonstrated the effective development of young children and the quality of the environment on the later developmental issues. Elucidating the impacts of these factors is of great value since excellent intervention techniques and policies depend on them that are aimed at enhancing children`s development as well as a consistent advance in their success. Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory in its turn offers a well-integrated framework that illustrates the intricate interaction between the person's individual development and the context in which a child is brought up and learns (Witherspoon et al., 2023). This theory reveals that the kid's development results from the interactions within the systems of different levels, such as microsystem (like a family or school), mesosystem (interactions between the microsystems), and macrosystem (cultural values, social norms) and their influences on the ecosystem, which is an environment that indirectly impacts a child. The inner and outer environments of the family are the building blocks within which, to a great extent, children's cognitive, socio-emotional and behavioural development takes place (Hoyne, 2022). As a result, it is the influence of the family environment that shapes children's future educational journey.
Socioeconomic status (SES) has been identified as the most significant determinant in the early childhood phase predicting later educational outcomes (van Zwieten et al., 2020). SES includes economic resources, educational level, and social status and each of these elements may determine the quality of education children get, the healthcare they receive and the amount of enrichment activities in which they can participate. Along with that, parents engagement and assurance also have significant impacts on shaping childrens learning paths. Studies constantly show that the parent's involvement in their children's education, which might include reading to them, helping with doing their homework and communicating with the teachers, has a positive effect on their educational achievements, school attendance, and socio-emotional development (Sonnenschein et al., 2020). Secondly, early life experiences for example trauma due to some adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can be powerful and life-long factors that determine the growth and educational prospects of the child. Trauma, including abuse, neglect, household dysfunction, and community violence, has been found to lead children to a variety of negative outcomes, e.g. worse education results, a higher chance of being retained at a lower grade, and thus greater probability of dropping out of school (Lee, Kim and Terry, 2020).
In the last few years, longitudinal studies for example the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) field surveys once again that early-childhood developmental factors and their long-term impact. Through longitudinal design that tracks children from infancy to adolescence and adulthood, researchers can obtain exceptional insight into the developmental changes that take place under the influence of individual, family and societal factors occurring over a long period (Nivison et al., 2024). Employing intensive studies in evidence-based measures, the joint efforts of the research community and policymakers can produce conditions that are positive for early child development and provide future great things for all children.
Problem StatementTo adequately predict academic results after early childhood factors, educational psychology has to keep abreast with the most significant factors that are known to impact academic performance.This study brings to the table a series of research of that show how early life influences the academic performance as well as the economic development of an individual. TheMCS (Millennium Cohort Study) is performed using the data from a longitudinal survey, which tracks children born in the UK in the early 2000s. Thereby, the study provides an excellent dataset to analyse the issues using a very reliable research methodology.The main aim of this dissertation is to dive into this dataset to identify the subtle ways in which early in-school experiences shape students' education paths.
The highly important point that childrens futures could be shaped by their early childhood experience and later life outcomes is no longer a debatable topic.For a long time, research made clear that parents education, socioeconomic status, early literacy activities done at home and preschool attendance all highly affect childrens performance in school (Duncan, Magnuson, & Votruba-Drzal, 2017).It has been shown too that negative events children go through as ACEs (i.e. any kind of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse, and any instance of house dysfunctions) lead to worse academic performance and higher dropout rates (Hughes et al., 2017).These investigations have revealed that the period of life before starting kindergarten is pivotal for future educational attainment and additional areas of ignorance regarding the mutual contribution of these factors in the UK context still exist.
Aim of ResearchThis study creates the foundation to research the in-depth aspects vital to child development because of its collection and use of comprehensive data over time-varying dimensions of a child's development.Previous results of MCS data interpretation were focused most of the time directly on general health and educational success, not on individual educational trajectories, which may have been affected by a wide range of early childhood experiences (Joshi & Fitzsimons, 2016).Emphasising the specific EC elements including parental involvement, early education interventions as well as the existence of ACEs, this dissertation is aimed at identifying the very components that impact the academic achievements of MCS.
Research QuestionsThis research aims to address several key questions:
How do social and economic aspects of early childhood influence the educational outcomes reflected in the MCS data?
What is the meaning of early intervention and parental engagement of social-economic disadvantages on the negative impacts?
Would the influence of early life traumas be different on the grades of children who belong to low- or middle-class families?
Through the research of these questions, the study strives to contribute to the pool of knowledge by offering ideas for focused interventions, which can reduce the negative impacts described above. Conversely, the work may enable policymakers and educators to gain the required insights on factors to focus on while designing early childhood programs to improve educational outcomes.
Significance of the studyThis research will look into the relationship between the early childhood characteristics and educational outcomes that have been obtained from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) emphasising family background, early interventions and exposure to adversities in this study. This study is designed in such a way that it plans to expand the existing knowledge and come up with suggestions that could change the academic theory and the practical approaches used in education and early child development.
MethodsParticipantsData obtained in this study came from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) which consists of a nationally representative sample of 19,500 children born in the UK, between 2000-2002. These certain segments of the study would be targeted and analysed the data of the fourth wave when most of the cohort members were 17 years old, which is the beginning of educational buildup. The children and their families were first selected through a stratified sampling method according to which different socio-economic and ethnic groups were selected, making the findings to be generalisable to the whole society.
MaterialsThe primary class of data in this study came from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) and it is good at providing detailed information about children who were born in the UK within a given span. The MCS data contains variables such as parental educational levels, SECLU, early literacy exercises, preschool attendance and traumatic childhood experience. The educational outcomes were explicitly reviewed using key stage 1 test results, regularity of school attendance, and teacher observations in key areas such as literacy and numeracy. We were able to conduct detailed research on the interconnections of the early childhood factors and the accomplished educational results due to the data-rich dataset.
DesignThe study was based on a longitudinal design which was achieved by the use of the MCS data to examine the effects of early childhood factors on educational attainment over time. The decision to use RStudio was based on its powerful tools for working with large datasets and running intricate statistical procedures. With the aid of this method, multiple linear regression models were able to see how early experiences affected educational outcomes while adjusting for possible confounders, thus providing a full picture of developmental trajectories within the framework of educational psychology.
ProcedureThe process consisted of several steps which were meant to be precise and to allow rigorous data analysis in R Studio. At first, data cleaning was executed to take care of any missing values, outliers and inconsistencies that could impact accuracy and lead to skewed results. Following this, variables were listed and defined according to pre-set questions and this was in line with the research objectives. Descriptive statistics was computed to discover the shape of a data distribution and based on findings patterns were identified. This required constructing multiple regression models to analyse if or how the number of identified early social factors affected academic results afterwards. Models that adjusted for gender, ethnicity and geographic variation were used, allowing this analysis to be viewed as reliable. The last phase was all about the validation of models where assumptions of linearity, homoscedasticity and no multicollinearity were checked. The entire analysis was put down in R scripts, emphasising the transparency of the process as well as the possibilities of future repeatability.
Ethical IssuesThe underlying ethical questions of this work were thoroughly tackled using second-hand data extracted from the MCS to avoid direct interaction with the participants to reduce privacy and informed consent issues. undefined
Confidentiality measures were thoroughly implemented; hence data was subjected to the rigorous anonymisation process to protect participant confidentiality. By this, identifiable information cannot be traced.
The highest standards of data security were rigorously followed which involved the secure storage and stringent handling guidelines to prevent unauthorised access and breaches.
MCS guidelines and ethical approval procedures were adhered to a great extent, while the review process by the university's ethics committee was extremely thorough. This made sure that the investigation did conform to all ethical standards and laws regulating research concerning people.
Through emphasising confidentiality, data security, and ethical approval, the study observed the research integrity and also gave deference to the rights and privacy of the individuals whose data was utilised.
Justification of MethodsThe selected methodologies are aptly suited to address the research inquiries for several compelling reasons:
Firstly, the longitudinal design gives an unrivalled insight into developmental paths and causal relationships by following people over time and thus building a solid base for analysing the role of child development factors in educational issues.
Consequently, regression analysis acts as an effective statistical instrument which helps control confounding factors and as a result, brings about a more precise comprehension of the complicated connections between factors and educational results.
In addition, using RStudio as the main analytical tool allows for more efficiency and increased transparency in the work with such a huge MCS database. It offers strong data manipulation and analysis capabilities with R scripts that enhance research replication in the long run.
Through these techniques, the study can be conducted by exploring the complex research questions properly and precisely, where in the end the study will contribute substantive knowledge to the field and also maintain methodological integrity.
ResultsThis chapter summarises the results of the analysis that was carried out on the dataset known as the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) Age 17 Sweep. During systematic examination and visualisation, hidden patterns and dependencies providing a basis for analysis and understanding are revealed; therefore, the foundation for further exploration and interpretation has been created. The MCS Age 17 Sweep dataset comprises information gathered from more than 19,500 individuals, who were born in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2002. This longitudinal study follows participants into their adulthood, not only tracking their experiences during the young adult transition but also capturing valuable insights from this time. The Age-17 sweep is the seventh data collection wave and mostly captures panel members' views as they traverse adolescence and find their foothold in adulthood. Facilitated by in-person interviews, self-reporting questionnaires, and objective ratings, the dataset highlights multiple domains such as education, health, and socio-economic dynamics providing a broad view of the participants' development over time.
Data cleaning and data processing are the two most fundamental steps in any analytical task leading to reliable and accurate analyses. During research with the dataset of the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) Age 17 Sweep, these processes were essential for the preparation of the data for suitable inferences. Through data cleaning, missing values would be systematically solved by separating and deleting rows with incomplete data. Through the elimination of these incidents, we ensured the bias of the results and upheld the reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the data set was cleaned up by eliminating irrelevant columns and standardising column names. This mainly improved clarity and analysis ease. Besides, data processing comprised of variable transformation to useful formats for analysis. Likewise, converted the "Year" variable into a factor to apply to the categorical data analysis since we are dealing with category data. Encoding categorical variable "Ethnicity" in a way that would be easier to read and understand and compare groups. Indeed, these data cleaning and processing steps helped in organising the data for more in-depth analysis in the next stage. Through orderly methods of filling in missing data values, removal of irrelevant information and standardisation of variables the quality and validity of the dataset have been improved. These steps make a basis for the interrelations of factors and proclaim the possibility of proceeding with statistical research.
Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is a fundamentally important part of the analysis process, as it lets researchers grasp the information about the underlying structure, distribution and relationships within the data. This shows that EDA was used in the MCS dataset to understand the characteristics of the cohort and to discover hidden patterns which may be used to guide later analysis.
Figure SEQ Figure * ARABIC 1: Barplot of Sweep Counts
The EDA started by plotting the sweeps per individual through a bar plot. This graphical presentation shared with us the amount of frequency of data collection in each sweep, thus, the study pointed out any possible change that may have occurred over time. On the next chart, the x-axis represented the sweep number whereas the y-axis showed the participants that replied to each sweep. Importantly, sweep 1 recorded the lowest number of participants, while the number grew with every sweep till Sweep 6, with the highest number of participants. This indicates that the researchers were able to statistically maintain the expanding group of participants over time. A close examination of sweep amounts distribution can allow spotting distribution gaps or data differences. Participation variations among the sweeps may reveal why such difference occurs especially in attrition or data collection techniques, which may require a deeper analysis. Apart from that, disparities in involvement levels across successive sweeps might also be revealing of the project's ongoing commitment and followership. In essence, visualising sweep counts by bar plot enabled the detection of the tendencies of data collection towards the MCS Age 17 Sweep dataset along with more advanced learning.
The participants' age distribution was plotted using a histogram, a graphical tool that infects the frequency distribution of the continuous variable. As we saw in the analysis of age distribution within the cohort, worked on exposing any noticeable patterns or outliers that would help us in our further investigations.
Figure SEQ Figure * ARABIC 2: Histogram of Age
The histogram shows that the majority of participants in our group were between the ages of 7 and 14, according to the bars that were the tallest for these ages. Besides, there were several lesser numbers of participants whose ages ranged between 3, 5 and 9 years as the histogram shows the shorter bars. Among all, the highest bar on the histogram corresponded to 14-year-olds which brought the conclusion that more individuals in that age group were part of the cohort. Information on the central tendency and variability of the participants' ages can be found by observing the distribution of the histogram. A specific age group made up a majority of the participants thus reflecting a normal trend. On the other hand, the spread or dispersion of the data informed us of the causes of variance of the ages of these people. Additionally, the histogram has reduced the role of the identification of potential biases or anomalies in the age distribution function which need to be investigated. If there is any deviation observed in the supposed distribution, e.g. a very high or low frequency at specific ages, it would signal some underlying influence, which is playing the part of changing the age composition of the cohort.
To shed more light on the profound underlying trends in age distribution over time, the boxplot was generated to enable comparison between the ages of participants starting with data from the different years of collection within the Millennium Cohort Study. This enabled us to see age distribution systematically, or perhaps trends and patterns in the ages of participants during the various years of the study. Thus, it helped conduct an assessment to understand if there were any changes over the years.
Figure SEQ Figure * ARABIC 3: Boxplot of Age by Year
The boxplot showed how participant age changed over time and covered only the modern part of the research period. The examination of age distribution indeed revealed an obvious trend of this variable changing over time. This pattern could have been due to the longitudinal type of research that involved the same individuals who underwent the natural ageing process for a long period. This accounts for the fact that there is a different median age for different sweep years as the cohort goes through different phases in life. The interquartile range (IQR) for each year of the study is shown in the boxplot by the height of the boxes; these values remained relatively stable for all the years. This homogeneity was a pointer to the fact that the dissemination of the ages of the participants around the median was steady across the duration of the study period. Although the median age changed a little, it experienced rather low fluctuations in participant ages around it that were indicative of certain stability of age distribution within the cohort. The boxplot, in particular, reflected the development of cohort participants age during the study, allowing us to make significant observations regarding longitudinal dynamics of age distribution. Through comparison of the distribution of ages for each year, trends and contrasts could be identified enabling us to conduct a thorough age evolution assessment which tracks its variation over time. The analysis revealed the precise position of participant age within the context of the MCS Age 17 Sweep dataset, thus it will be the first step towards discovering other related age patterns and attributes.
Linear Model
Figure SEQ Figure * ARABIC 4: Linear Model
The graph presents the average measurements of body mass index (BMI) observed in boys and in girls within a certain age range. On the graph, y axis probably displays the average BMI ranges, whilst the Cause and Effect sentences can be rephrased into the following sentence: However, globalization can hurt traditional industries by creating unfair competition or altering consumer preferences, leading to job loss and societal disruption. this time on this chart, we will see two unique lines that are present to mark average BMI of boys(upper) and girls(lower).
Notions of positive slope in both lines demonstrate that while both genders experience an increase in average BMI with age, there is consistency in the trend. The notion that BMI tends to surge with children and teenagers as they advance through their childhood and adolescent years is in line with the view that at these stages biological maturity is a natural growth and developmental process. Along this line, the growing disparity in average BMI of boys and girls becomes apparent from the point when the spacing between the [given-line] lines begins to widen as the age increases. The enlarging gap could may probably reflect different growth dynamics and physical change between girls and boys when they step up to teenagers. The possible causes of this ramification such as hormonal changes, BMI component variations, and lifestyle differentations could be among others. This graph widely brings forth revealing trends of BMI for boys and girls, which help in the discovery of more in-depth, age-specific gender development patterns.
This graph is using the lm() function in R for a linear model as a method. Particularly, the research consists of the relationship detector of the "Age" variable as the response (dependent) variable and the "Year" variable as the predictor (independent) variable by making use of dataset data. The fitted model is subsequently evaluated through the summary() function, which furnishes an elaborate inspection of the model's parameter estimations Apply simple linear regression in R on the dataset to establish whether or not there was a relationship between age and year. A summary is provided thereafter for further investigation and analysis.
Discussion
The findings of the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) Age 17 Sweep allow us to see how early childhood events as early as toddlerhood affect later school performance and socioeconomic status at age 17. This data is in concert with other studies that child development in the early stages greatly influences how their academic and social lives will evolve in the future (Duncan, Magnuson and Votruba-Drzal, 2014; Hughes et al., 2006). Socioeconomic indicator (SES) has been proven that one's achievement in school has a relationship between SES and students' performances. The learning outcomes for children of higher SES mostly improve concerning the results for children of lower socio-economic status. It has been evident throughout various iterations of this research. Listen to the given audio and comprehend the key takeaways. This is a similarity to Sirins (2005) study, which found that childhood amplification in SES was the very first key factor that affected academic success progression in the future. The research gave evidence of the fact that kids in families with higher class, income, and educational levels were provided with better schools, learning materials, and entertainment means compared to children whose families lacked these facilities (Baird and Mollen, 2023).
There are numerous research findings that family engagement with school is one of the strategies that students can employ to improve, and the result of this achievement is the MCS outcomes. Involving family members (for instance, attending school events, helping with homework, and encouraging a habit of reading) in their progenys life has been reported to be associated with their childrens attendance rates in school and their scholastic progress (Barger, et al., 2019). But they are not only to learn stuff but they also make the house a nice place to keep, which is a good thing, because they feel better about themselves and are more confident. The MCS statistics made it known that advanced approaches, especially in reading and math, are excellent accelerators of school progress. Quoting Branquinho et al. (2023), this also supports the hypothesis that preschool and early years educational experiences support developing a firm foundation for further learning. Providing poor children with good quality of ECE members should be an effective way of impacting the school performance of everyone, says the study.
The results from the MCS on this topic show that childhood trauma (ACEs) influence a person's doing well or not in learning in their later years. (Ju et al. 2023) established that those who had the background of being physically and emotionally abused or constrained to experience petty domestic problems tended to have a bad experience in the classroom and some did not at all finish their education. According to the ecological systems theory, the childs carrier and its condition could affect the persons growth (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Baird, and Mollen, 2023). The findings of the MCS research show that there is a need for special social and emotional treatments to be provided for traumatized children ensuring they access the proper support for successful outcomes in school. The specificity of the MCS layout, in contrast with others, offers us the possibility to learn about how early years childrens characteristics affect later outcomes in their lives. Monitoring the 45 long-term participants participating in the study helps to understand more about how early things change the lives of individuals from a child to a young adult and what is seen and observed until the age of a mature person by using the time for observation. This method`s advantage is that it demonstrates this relation as opposed to just an association. Thus, it suggests that early help and ongoing support during childhood and youth are needed rather than intervention only when the troubles appear.
Magnified School policy and practice that come strong from the MCS results. They also claim that through SE, parents involvement, and disorder ACEs activities we can improve the students performance in school. The past research also gives us cause to think of the implementation of legislation that gives all the kids equally good preschool options regardless of the income level of their family. It means that children from different backgrounds get the same opportunities. In the future, scholars are called to examine the role these early happenings play in what is to come here. For instance, knowing for sure about the best aspects of the family support approach and accordingly incorporating the same into the assistance methods can be extremely useful. As well, further research could explore how education and social class impact forthcoming generations which leads to the possible conclusion that social background does not determine what is good and what is bad. It is the society where these circumstances emerge that determines it. This would help us determine the ways to make social mobility and educational equality a more widespread and enduring phenomenon in subsequent years. The study reports that the Mouse Developmental Age 17 Sweep involves intricate roots of prenatal events and academics in the future. Adverse childhood experience (ACE) kids can do with early assistance, their families more connected, a specialised help on the cards. Through investigations and law-making, researchers and lawmakers quite well to not just create settings that aid and guide kids to build a strong base that makes them succeed but also a setting that helps kids who are from families with different socio-economic backgrounds. Apart from that, it is equally the study providing evidence for discussions and facts that could help to improve education not only in the UK but beyond.
Conclusion
The Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) Age 17 Sweep suggests that early life experiences go a long way in determining your social mobility and academic success. These findings emphasized the role that society, having family involved, and trauma in the childhood years (ACEs) played in that child's advancement success. Highlighting the MCS results, it is revealed that high socio-economic status (SES) kids perform better in school. It is proof that investing so much effort in children's education at home is very vital since they are the future. Engagement and core participation of the family through early educational programs are also being successfully utilized to bring outstanding academic success. This shows that such policy demands are focused on the issue of the importance of parents' involvement and their children accessing good early learning places. In addition to the above, if ACEs interfere with the way children study, this implies the need for extra measures to be taken that aim to better the students social-emotional development. The research in these lines is evidence that students should have well-rounded plans at school with the purpose of equal educational chances and addressing the many challenges in society. By focusing on the most essential areas, lawmakers and teachers can help achieve extravagant progress in pupil outcomes and this can also provide them with a bright future.
Recommendations
Based on the results of the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) Age 17 Sweep, the following suggestions have been made to improve school success and fix problems that start in early childhood:
Enhance Access to Quality Early Education: Make preschools accessible for children coming from all backgrounds in such a way that they are sure, at the same time, to be affordable. This way the poor children would be on the same pedal with the rich kids. Consequently, their reading and maths foundation would make a strong base.
Increase Parental Involvement Programs: Build and help establish parents' participation in their child's early primary school education through creating programmes that facilitate this. This would be a series of school, community, and family programs on the essentiality of parental involvement and providing parents with with necessary skills to continuously support their children in school.
Implement Targeted Interventions for Children with ACEs: Establish conditional support services for the teens who have suffered abuse as a number of the ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences) focused on helping children with the ACEs in the first place. These services will have to be inclusive of counselling, addressing mental health issues and helping with school work so that these students can be better when it comes to dealing with problems and their work at school.
Strengthen Socioeconomic Support Structures: Work on solving the deeper root social and economic problems that stop children from doing well in class by passing legislation that enables families to earn bigger paychecks, keep their homes cash, and afford medication. The implementation of these measures reduces background noise and brings balance to the environment. This in turn helps kids to concentrate better on their class assignments.
Regular Training for Educators on Socioeconomic Sensitivity: Trained teachers and school administration can help decrease the income-based student achievement gap via different techniques. The aim of the class must be to give teachers a chance to arm themselves with the necessary tools for properly meeting the requirements of young people from various backgrounds.
Longitudinal Studies and Data Monitoring: In addition to the program, also helps and funds continuous studies like the MCS to similarly keep track of the evolving nature of early treatments and social factors and how they eventually impact students' learning experiences in the long run. Education in such a competitive environment should make this information to keep revising and applying the rules and methods in schools.
ReferencesBaird, B.N. and Mollen, D., 2023. The internship, practicum, and field placement handbook: A guide for the helping professions. Routledge.
Barger, M.M., Kim, E.M., Kuncel, N.R. and Pomerantz, E.M., 2019. The relation between parents involvement in childrens schooling and childrens adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), p.855.
Branquinho, C., Moraes, B., Noronha, C., Ferreira, T., Neto Rodrigues, N. and Gaspar de Matos, M., 2023. Perceived Quality of Life and Life Satisfaction: Does the Role of Gender, Age, Skills, and Psychological Factors Remain Relevant after the COVID-19 Pandemic? Children, 10(9), p.1460.
Bronfenbrenner, U., 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2017). Moving beyond correlations in assessing the consequences of poverty.Annual review of psychology,68, 413-434.
Duncan, G.J., Magnuson, K. and Votruba-Drzal, E., 2014. Boosting family income to promote child development. The Future of Children, pp.99-120.
Hoyne, C. (2022). ABCs and 123s: The Role of the Home Learning Environment in Cognitive and Socioemotional Development in Early Childhood.
Hughes, D., Rodriguez, J., Smith, E.P., Johnson, D.J., Stevenson, H.C. and Spicer, P., 2006. Parents' ethnic-racial socialization practices: a review of research and directions for future study. Developmental psychology, 42(5), p.747.
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., ... & Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet Public Health,2(8), e356-e366.
Joshi, H., & Fitzsimons, E. (2016). The Millennium Cohort Study: the making of a multi-purpose resource for social science and policy.Longitudinal and Life Course Studies,7(4), 409-430.
Ju, L.S., Morey, T.E., Seubert, C.N. and Martynyuk, A.E., 2023. Intergenerational perioperative neurocognitive disorder. Biology, 12(4), p.567.
Lee, H., Kim, Y. and Terry, J. (2020). Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on mental disorders in young adulthood: Latent classes and community violence exposure. Preventive Medicine, 134, p.106039.
Mukherji, P. and Albon, D., 2022. Research methods in early childhood: An introductory guide.
Nivison, M.D., Labella, M.H., Raby, K.L., Doom, J.R., Martin, J., Johnson, W.F., Zamir, O., Englund, M.M., Simpson, J.A., Carlson, E.A. and Roisman, G.I. (2024). Insights into child abuse and neglect: Findings from the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation. Development and Psychopathology, pp.113.
Sirin, S.R., 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), pp.417-453.
Sonnenschein, S., Stites, M. and Dowling, R. (2021). Learning at home: What preschool childrens parents do and what they want to learn from their childrens teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 19(3), pp.309-322.
van Zwieten, A., Teixeira-Pinto, A., Lah, S., Nassar, N., Craig, J.C. and Wong, G. (2020). Socioeconomic Status During Childhood and Academic Achievement in Secondary School. Academic Pediatrics, 21(5).
Witherspoon, D., Rebecca, BmacaColbert, M.Y., Browning, C.R., Tamara, Leventhal, T., Matthews, S.A., Pinchak, N., Roy, A., Sugie, N.F. and Winkler, E.N. (2023). PlaceBased Developmental Research: Conceptual and Methodological Advances in Studying Youth Development in Context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 88(3), pp.7130.
