Ethical and Legal Decision-Making in Nursing Practice
- Subject Code :
NSG2HEL
- University :
School of Nursing and Midwifery Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Singapore
NSG2HEL 2024 Assessment 1 Marking
School of Nursing & Midwifery NSG2HEL Assessment 1 Marking rubric (15% of total grade) |
|||||
MARKINGSCALE |
Excellent (>80%) |
Very good (80%) |
Good (70%) |
Poor (< 50> |
Max Marks |
Identify and briefly describe the ethical principles/theory in this case. |
Identifies relevant ethical principles/theories, concisely explains how they apply to the specific scenario, and provides a brief critical analysis of the chosen theoretical approach (e.g., strengths and weaknesses). 5 marks |
Accurately identifies ethical principles/theories and explains their application to the scenario. 4 marks |
Identifies ethical principles/theories but the explanation of their application is limited or unclear. 3 marks |
Struggles to identify relevant ethical concepts or provides inaccurate or insufficient explanation. <3> |
/5 marks |
Identify and briefly describe the legal issues that apply to this case. |
Accurately identifies relevant legal issues, concisely explains how they apply to the scenario, and outlines possible legal consequences. 5 marks |
Identifies most relevant legal issues with a generally accurate explanation of their application. 4 marks |
Identifies some relevant legal issues but the explanation of their application may be incomplete or inaccurate. 3 marks |
Fails to identify relevant legal issues or demonstrates significant misunderstanding. <3> |
/5 marks |
Considering the legal and ethical implications in the scenario, what would you do in this situation, and explain why? |
Provides a well-justified action plan grounded in clear ethical and legal reasoning. 5 marks |
Provides an action plan aligned with general ethical and legal considerations, may have minor inconsistencies in reasoning. 4 marks |
Provides an action plan but lacks a clear connection to ethical and legal analysis. 3 marks |
Provides no action plan or a plan that is inconsistent with previous analysis. <3> |
/5 marks |
/15 marks |