HCS104 Assessment 3: Report (3000 words)
HCS104 Assessment 3: Report (3000 words)
Movies often depict aspects or issues related to human lifespan development. You are to watch a movie recommended by your lecturer and focus on single character to develop a biopsychosocial assessment. You can watch these movies in group settings but be sure to develop your report independently. You must: Develop a biopsychosocial assessment of the character including a genogram and ecomap. With this assessment completed and attached as an appendix, you are to write a 3000-word report on the developmental stage of the character.
Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
Biopsychosocial Assessment Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the character's biological, psychological, and social factors, supported by evidence from the movie and relevant literature. Provides a comprehensive analysis of the character's biopsychosocial aspects, with clear connections between the movie's content and theoretical concepts. Offers a basic analysis of the character's biopsychosocial aspects, with some evidence from the movie, but lacks depth or integration of theoretical concepts. Provides a superficial or incomplete analysis of the character's biopsychosocial aspects, with little evidence from the movie or theoretical integration.
Genogram and Ecomap Constructs a detailed and well-organized genogram and ecomap, accurately representing the character's family history, social support network, and environmental influences. Creates a clear and coherent genogram and ecomap, effectively illustrating the character's family and social context, with minor errors or omissions. Constructs a basic genogram and ecomap, with some inaccuracies or oversights in representing the character's family and social context. Constructs a rudimentary or incomplete genogram and ecomap, with significant inaccuracies or omissions in representing the character's family and social context.
Writing Clarity and Organization Demonstrates exceptional clarity, coherence, and organization in writing, with well-structured paragraphs, smooth transitions, and minimal grammatical errors. Communicates ideas clearly and effectively, with a logical organization of content, mostly smooth transitions, and few grammatical errors that do not impede understanding. Communicates ideas adequately, with some clarity and organization in writing, but may have occasional lapses in coherence, organization, or grammar that hinder understanding. Communicates ideas poorly, with unclear or disjointed writing, lacking coherence, organization, or grammar, making it difficult to understand.
Critical Thinking and Analysis Engages in insightful critical thinking and analysis, demonstrating a deep understanding of the character's development, context, and implications for lifespan development theory and practice. Engages in thoughtful critical thinking and analysis, demonstrating a solid understanding of the character's development, context, and implications for lifespan development theory and practice. Engages in basic critical thinking and analysis, demonstrating a limited understanding of the character's development, context, and implications for lifespan development theory and practice. Engages in minimal critical thinking and analysis, demonstrating little understanding of the character's development, context, or implications for lifespan development theory and practice.
Overall Quality and Originality Exhibits exceptional quality and originality in the analysis, demonstrating creativity, depth, and insight beyond the expected level for undergraduate work. Demonstrates good quality and originality in the analysis, showing creativity, depth, and insight appropriate for undergraduate-level work. Demonstrates fair quality and originality in the analysis, showing some creativity, depth, and insight but lacking consistency or depth. Demonstrates poor quality and originality in the analysis, showing little creativity, depth, or insight, and relying heavily on surface-level observations or summaries.
