HIS304 Major Features of Merchant and Industrial Capitalism and the Role of the Triangular Trade
- Subject Code :
HIS304
- University :
Kingston University Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
United Kingdom
What were the major features of (i) the period of merchant capitalism (1500-1750) and (ii) the period of industrial capitalism (1750-1875), and in what ways did the triangular trade contribute to the transition from the one to the other?
Required Reading (compulsory for this question)
- Capps, G. (2001) 1.1. The Expansion of Europe: Mercantile Trade 1500-1750 (pp. 13-19) and 1.2. Industrial Capitalism and Free Trade: 1750-1875 (pp. 20-27). In P. Panayiotopoulos and G. Capps (eds)World Development: An IntroductionLinks to an external site..London: Pluto.
- Williams, E. (1944/1994)Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Chapter 3: British Commerce and the Triangular Trade, (pp. 51-84).
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeResponse to question (25 points)
0-5: Little if any attempt has been made to address the question as it has been posed.;
6-10: An adequate attempt has been made to answer the question, but its deeper meaning and significance in relation to this part of the module has not really been comprehended;
11-15: A satisfactory response to the question which demonstrates some comprehension of its deeper meaning and significance in relation to this part of the module. ;
16-20: A good response to the question that both comprehends its deeper meaning and significance in relation to this part of the module and attempts to develop its own position.;
21-25: A very good response to the question that both comprehends its meaning and significance in relation to this part of the module and develops a convincing argument that is notable for its originality and coherence.
Knowledge and understanding (25 points) 0-5: No use has been made of the recommended reading, which was compulsory for this essay. There is also little if any knowledge or understanding of the relevant lecture material covered in this part of the module; |
|
25pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCritical analysis and evaluation (25 points) 0-5: The essay is descriptive and does not meaningfully deal with the key ideas or arguments of the economic thinker(s) or school(s) of thought in question; |
Referencing, structure & language (25 points)
0-5: Essay has not followed good academic practice in terms of citation and referencing; structure and signposting; and clear, accurate English. This is unacceptable at University level. ;
6-10: Essay has not followed good academic practice in two of the following areas: citation and referencing; structure and signposting; and clear and accurate English. This must be addressed in future work;
11-15: Essay largely follows good academic practice in terms of citation and referencing; essay structure and signposting; and clear and accurate English, but this is not always consistent and at least one of these areas requires major improvement;
16-20: Most of the essay demonstrates good academic practice in terms of citation and referencing; essay structure and signposting; and clear, accurate English, but with some slippages.;
21-25: Essay has consistently followed good academic practice in terms of citation and referencing; essay structure and signposting; and clear and accurate English throughout.
I would like a great referencing in Harvard style and follow the instruction and the required pages and books only which I will send you. Dont use any other materials except the one I will send you which these are the ones above
