SubjectCode:

MAN200

SubjectName:

IntroductiontoManagement

Assessment Title:

IndividualVideoPresentation

Assessment Type:

Video

PresentationLength:

5-7Minutes(marksaredeductedwhenlimitsarebelow

orin excess)

Weighting:

30%

TotalMarks:

30

Submission:

MyKBS(Kaltura)

DueDate:

Tuesday,Week9 at15:55(AEST)

Traffic Light

AmountofGenerativeArtificialIntelligence (GenerativeAI) usage

EvidenceRequired

This assessm

ent (?)

Level1

Prohibited:

NoGenerativeAIallowed

This assessment showcases your individual knowledge,skillsand/orpersonalexperiencesin the absence of Generative AI support.

The use of generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may potentially result in penaltiesforacademicmisconduct,includingbut notlimitedtoamark ofzerofortheassessment.

Level2

Optional:

YoumayuseGenerativeAIforresearchand content generation that is appropriately referenced.

Seeassessmentinstructionsfordetails

This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding, creativity, and idea generation intheresearchphase ofyourassessmentand to produce content that enhances your assessment.I.e.,images.Youdonothaveto use it.

Theuseof GenAIisoptional forthis assessment.

Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link belowtolearnhowtoreferenceGenerativeAI.

https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai

In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration includingallpromptsandresponsesusedforthe assessment.

Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the contentgeneration parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct,includingbutnotlimitedtoamarkof zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section

above.

Level3

Compulsory:

YoumustuseGenerativeAItocomplete your assessment

Seeassessmentinstructionfordetails

ThisassessmentfullyintegratesGenerativeAI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise.

Alwayscheckyourassessmentinstructions carefully as theremaystillbe limitations on whatconstitutesacceptableuse,andthese may be specific to each assessment.

YouwillbetaughthowtousegenerativeAIand assessed on its use.

Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used.Click onthe link belowtolearnhowtoreferenceGenerativeAI.

https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai

In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration includingallpromptsandresponsesusedforthe assessment.

Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the contentgeneration parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct,includingbutnotlimitedtoamarkof zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the

specificassessmentinstructionsinthesection above.

(?)

Criteria

HD (High Distinction)

(100-85%)

DN(Distinction) (84-75%)

CR(Credit) (74-65%)

P (Pass) (64-50%)

F (Fail) (49-0%)

Anoverviewof the key management changes identified (5 Marks)

A very comprehensiveand detailedoverviewof the changes

Adetailedoverviewof the changes

An overview of the changes. However, moredetailrequired

Anattemptatan overview of the changes.

Insufficientdetail provided.

Improvement

required

No real attempt at providinganoverviewor relevant details.

Significantimprovement required.

An analysis of thefactorsthat prompted the trends with relevant examples

(5Marks)

Excellentuseof examples.

Relevanceisvery clearly stated

Verygooduseof examples.

Relevanceisstated

Gooduseofexamples butrelevancecouldbe clearer

Adequate use of examples but relevance and examplesneedclarity

No use of relevant examplesandirrelevant discussion or no discussion of the implementation

Reflectionsandconclusion (8 Marks)

Demonstrates depth of analysisandinsightand directions and trends follow from the analysis of previous sections clearly and succinctly.

Individualeffortis outstanding.

Demonstrates some insight and analysis follows from previous clearlyandsuccinctly. Individual effort very well demonstrated.

Descriptive and analysisfollowsfrom previous sections although could have been more in depth. Individual effort well demonstrated.

Superficial but satisfactoryindividual effort demonstrated. Analysis needs development.

Individualeffortisnot demonstrated.

Reflectionsaremissingor lack relevance. Analysisis unrelated or missing.

Quality of presentation organization, slides,clarity of delivery and length

(7Marks)

Exceptionally high quality of the presentationwherethe ideas were clearly expressed.Deliveryis engaging with minimal reading, excellent pronunciation, fluency and volume. Slides content is very well organised.Slideshave averygoodbalanceof text and images.

High quality of the presentation where the ideas were clearly expressed. Delivery shows some efforts at engaging audience but there is noticeable reading. Some mispronunciation and issuesoffluencybutdo not affect meaning.

Contentwellorganised.

Contentanduseof slidesisverygood.

Good quality of the presentation where the ideas were adequately expressed although slides are mostly read. Delivery is good although pronunciation and fluency could have beenimproved.Slide design and content organisationisgood.

The presentation quality was limited, with the ideas being described and confusinginpartsand content was mostly read. Fluency and pronunciation need development. Little effort to engage viewer. Slides design and content was satisfactory.

Thepresentationdidnot meet the required standard. Ideas were poorly expressed.

Content was unclear. Delivery, presentation, anddevelopment/useof slidedeckneededmuch improvement and relevance

Demonstrated useofacademic references (5 Marks)

Very well targeted prompts, well contextualised with targeted output format delineated.Allprompts and links as well as academic references adequately referenced and integrated in the presentation following KBS guidelines.

Excellentuseof paraphrasing

Well targeted prompts although context and output format could havebeenimproved.All prompts and links as well as academic references adequately referenced and integrated in the presentation following KBS guidelines with minimal errors. Good use of paraphrasing

Gooduseofprompts withsomelimitations in specificity and context. Some prompts andlinks as well as academic references adequately referenced and integrated in the presentation following KBS guidelines.

Improvements needed in

paraphrasing

Basic prompts requiring development in specificity and context. Some references were missing and paraphrasingskills needdevelopment

Prompts lack clarity. No provision or use of relevant references and evidence of cut and paste.