LAW701 Assessment 1: Analysis and Comparison of Legal Sources (AGLC4)
- Subject Code :
LAW701
- University :
The University of Melbourne Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
Suggested Template for Assessment
1
Please note: the journal articles are random ones chosen just as examples.
I PART A SECONDARY SOURCE ANALYSIS (see rule 1.12.2 AGLC 4)
Shireen Morris, Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, Non-discrimination and Equality Before the Law: Why Reform is NecessaryIndigenous Law Bulletin 7 (2011) 42.
Outline authors contention/ point of view (what is article about)
Outline authors arguments used to support the above
How credible are the arguments what is the evidence used is it persuasive, relevant, current etc.
Need to provide one `significant quote that explains one or more of the authors arguments Say why the quote is significant. (Rule 1.5.1 AGLC 4)
II PART B PEER-REVIEWED SECONDARY SOURCE ANALYSIS
Jani McCitcheon, Curing the Authorless Void: Protecting Computer -Generated Works (2013) 37 (1) Melbourne University Law Review 46.
Same as above except the source must be peer-reviewed. See 2.21 Session 2 slide
III PART C COMPARISON OF SOURCES
Comparing the two sources.
Critically analysing the similarities and differences in terms of credibility, strength of arguments and the value of these two sources for the relevance to your research question
.fg
