PhD Research Proposal
PhD Research Proposal
CONTRIBUTIONS AND CHALLENGES OF EARLY CHILDHOOD ADMINISTRATORS TO ATTAIN QUALITY EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION IN THE BATTICALOA DISTRICT OF SRI LANKA
You do not rewrite all the part.
1..Please write about research paradigm
Participants part please write only why select this Batticaloa. No need to write beginning part.
No need mixed methods to write
Write qualitative and quantitative approaches correction
No need to correct thematic analysis part
Correct survey and interview
Correct the ethic part
Chapter 3: Proposed Research Methods, Analysis of Data
3.1 Introduction The aim of this research is to explore the contributions and challenges of early childhood administrators in attaining quality early childhood education in Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka. Research paradigm
Research paradigm is missing ..
Please write couple of sentences in here.
What going to be a oveall approach and understanding or under taking the research.
For example. Quantitative app---- figure go to black and white becourse in the figure tell it
Qualitative appo going to be making some reporting or area infinitive or something
May be going to interperate or may be critical theory or might be deconstructed or something
This research will use a mixed method approach in which qualitative and quantitative data will be collected. Further, the data collection process will be guided by the research questions. Thus, surveys and interviews will be the data collection tools for this research.
3.2 Participants
This research participants will be early childhood education administrators Who they are?????/ dc are they early ce administrators.
. The researcher will contact the Early Childhood Educational office for permission to contact to participate with early childhood education administrators including the District Coordinator (DC), Regional Assistant Director (RAD), Early Childhood Care Development officers, and Preschool principals. All participants will be selected from the Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka.
Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka.
Why choose Batticaloa district? participants coming from particular district -low socia economic, and oppounity compare to other district thus, fewer early childhood centers it is
3. 3 The research approach: Mixed Methods
In research, a mixed method is the systematic integration of qualitative and quantitative data within a single investigation (Regnault et al., 2018). De Torres et al. (2023) asserted that qualitative researchers are interested in exploring and understanding the experiences of individuals within a social group. This research will focus on the experience and perceptions of early childhood administrators in the Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka. The quantitative approach involves collecting quantitative data, such as using numbers, tables and figures (De Torres et al., 2023). The authors further explain that combining qualitative and quantitative data collection approaches is seen as mixed methods research. The term mixed methods are also defined by Brannen (2017) as the process of collecting, analysing and mixing quantitative and qualitative data from the research process to attain a deeper understanding of the research questions. In this research, the researcher will collect both quantitative data which is demographic information focussing on the early childhood administrators qualification, years of working experience and available support from the government through survey responses and qualitative information about administrators real experiences, opinions and emotions about their current contributions and challenges through interviews to better understand the research questions. Thus, in this research the mixed method approach will help answer the research questions by collecting and analysing quantitative and qualitative data to provide an in-depth understanding of the challenges faced by early childhood administrators to attain quality early childhood education.
3. 4 Qualitative and Quantitative approaches
This study relies on qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data is used to better understand the contributions and challenges of early childhood administrators to attain quality early childhood education in Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka. According to Ajimotokan (2022) a qualitative approach entails conducting investigations that focus analysis of emotions, opinions, viewpoints or perspectives. The main aim is to explore and understand how individuals or groups attribute importance to issues related to society or humanity-related issues (Ajimotokan, 2022). In this research data collection tools will be surveys and interviews. Interview questions can help capture the participants thoughts, feelings, and experiences (Brannen, 2017). The researcher will examine the perspectives and experiences of early childhood administrators in this study.
Here should talk about quantitative data similar to qualitative..
Ajimotokan (2022) stated that the quantitative approach emphasises numbers, tables and figures in the collection and interpretation of data. The survey will collect both qualitative data and quantitative data. Surveys can help capture the administrators level of qualifications, working experience and available support from the government. This type of data will be collected using numbers or tables from early childhood administrators.
Should talk about quantitative data analysis how will analysis quantitative data????
3.5 Data analysis: Thematic analysis Thematic analysis is a method of analysing qualitative data. Thematic analysis will be chosen for this research because it is a well-known method for identifying, analysing and reporting themes in data (Peel, 2020). As highlighted by Maguire and Delahunt (2017) the purpose of a thematic analysis is to find the underlying themes within the data by thoroughly reviewing the survey responses and interview transcripts and identifying patterns in the meanings. Additionally, thematic analysis generates valuable insights from data encompassing the opinions, experiences, and emotions of participants (Maguire & Delahunt 2017). The process of conducting a thematic analysis of data consists of six essential steps (Terry et al., 2017). These steps include: familiarising with the data, generating codes, constructing themes, reviewing potential themes, defining and naming themes and producing the report (p.29). Thus, the researcher will follow the six essential steps of thematic analysis of the qualitative data collected:
Step 1: Familiarising with the data:
The first step in any qualitative analysis is reading and re-reading the transcripts (Maguire & Delahunt, 2017). To become familiar with the data, researcher read the interview transcripts and survey responses received from the participants several times. An in-depth comprehension of the qualitative data is ensured by this stage (Seth, Chadha & Bhatia, 2022). In this study, the researcher will familiarise herself with the collected data by re-listening to the audio-recorded interviews, developing the transcripts and reading these transcripts many times to understand the data. Similarly, responses to qualitative surveys will also be read many times to understand the data.
Step 2: Generating codes:
The data will then be coded. Meaningful themes or patterns will be found and labelled by the researcher in this step (Peel, 2020).
The codes will emerge from the data
Step 3: Constructing themes:
Researchers will actively attempt to find themes after coding by grouping relevant codes. This procedure entails categorising codes into themes that capture data relationships and commonalities. In addition, in this stage, the researcher will develop the initial drafts of a written piece of writing and maintain a sense of flexibility and sincerity for modification (Terry et al., 2017). For example, in this research, the themes could include a variety of topics, such as Theme -1 Administrators contributions, Theme -2 Administrators challenges, Theme -3 Resources and so on.
Step 4: Reviewing potential themes:
In the fourth phase, researchers review and develop the preliminary themes that have been identified in Step 3 (Kiger & Varpio, 2020). In this research, the researcher will gather to each theme and develop about contributions and challenges of early childhood administrators to attain the quality of early childhood education.
Step 5: Defining and Naming Themes:
In this stage of theme refinement and the goal is to identify the essence of what each theme is about (Maguire & Delahunt, 2017). To make each theme more specific and communicable the researcher will describe it and give it a unique name.
Step 6: Producing the Report:
The last phase entails drafting a report that explains the themes found and how they relate to the research objectives forming an all-encompassing story based on qualitative data (Peel, 2020). The stage of writing up themes follows the step of defining subjects.
3.6 Data collection Methods
The research question focuses on the contribution and challenges of early childhood administrators to attain quality early childhood education. Discovering the contribution and challenges in this research may be best achieved by utilising tools that capture qualitative and quantitative data. In this research, the data collection methods used will be surveys and interviews. Surveys can collect both qualitative and quantitative data while interviews gather qualitative data based on the design of the research questions (Klem et al., 2022).
3.6.1 Surveys
One data collection method that will be utilised in this research will be an anonymous survey. Queiros et al. (2017) stated that surveys are less costly and can be implemented remotely through communication tools to overcome geographical barriers. Further, Rice et al. (2017) indicated that surveys allow for different methods of communication between the researchers and participants, such as emails, websites and social media platforms. In this research, the survey will be conducted online using the online survey platform Qualtrics. The survey will be administered to early childhood administrators to gain an understanding of such things as: administrators qualifications, years of working experience and available support from the government. Participants in this research will be invited to complete the survey within four to six weeks of receiving the survey link.
3.6.2 Interview
The interview is a data gathering instrument which allows for flexibility in both time and mode through the use of multi-channel such as face to face or online interviews. There are essentially three primary types of interviews, namely the structured interview, the unstructured interview and the semi-structured interview (Sahoo, 2022). In this research, the researcher will use semi structured interview which is flexible for the interviewer and interviewees (Sahoo, 2022). In Sri Lanka early childhood education administrators are very busy with their administrative work and semi structure interview will allow the resreacher to gather data according to the administrators availability. Semi structured Interviews can generate in-depth information and be particularly useful to investigate the experiences, opinions or attitudes of interviewees (Monday, 2019). The author further indicated that semi structured interviews capture the respondents emotions which makes it easier for the researchers to understand the real situation. In this research, the interview will focus on early childhood administrators real experiences, opinions and emotions about their current contributions and challenges in their attempts to attain quality early childhood education in Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka.
3.7 Ethical Considerations
Be Applying for ethical clearance to
Considering human ethics clearance, this study will not pose any risks to the participants participating in the study. Regarding participant private information, the study will be considered low risk because it will not ask for participants personal details or ethnic and cultural backgrounds.
REFERENCES
Abesooriya, L. (2020). A Critical evaluation of the ownership and responsibilities of early childhood care, development and education in Sri Lanka, OUSL Journal, 15(01),101-126. http://doi.org/10.4038/ouslj.v15i1.7478
Ajimotokan, H. A. (2022). Research techniques: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach for engineers. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13109-7
Anna, Johnson., Phillips, D. A., Schochet, O. N., Martin, A., & Castle, S. (2021). To whom little is given, much is expected: ECE teacher stressors and supports as determinants of classroom quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.002
Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), 30-33. https:///Users/balasoba/Downloads/sinanalmawla,+7-2.pdfAturupane, H., & Little, A. W. (2021). General education in Sri Lanka. In Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 Singapore, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_18-1
Averett, P., Hegde, A. V., & Church, J. (2021). Early childhood administrators use of and beliefs about inclusive practices for gay and lesbian families. Journal of Early Childhood Research: ECR, 19(4), 413428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211011508
Metin Aslan, . (2018). From an academicians preschool diary: emergent curriculum and its practices in a qualified example of laboratory preschool. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 7(1), 97-110. http://jct.sciedupress.comAttanasio, O., Cattan, S., & Meghir, C. (2022). Early childhood development, human capital, and poverty. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 853892. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092821-053234.
Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2017). Early Childhood Education: The Long-Term Benefits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(2), 255269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1273285
Brinkman, S. A., Hasan, A., Jung, H., Kinnell, A., Nakajima, N., & Pradhan, M. (2017). The role of preschool quality in promoting child development: evidence from rural Indonesia. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(4), 483505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2017.1331062
Burchinal, M. (2018). Measuring early care and education quality. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12260
Church, J., Hegde, A. V., Averett, P., & Ballard, S. M. (2018). Early childhood administrators attitudes and experiences in working with gay- and lesbian-parented families. Early Child Development and Care, 188(3), 264280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1213725
Cortzar, A., Molina, M. de los ., Slman, J., & Manosalva, A. (2020). Early Childhood Education Effects on School Outcomes: Academic Achievement, Grade Retention and School Drop Out. Early Education and Development, 31(3), 376394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1666445
Eyisi, Daniel. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91-100. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103224
De Torres, R. Q., Filoteo, J. A., Tabudlo, J. B., & Tuazon, J. A. (2023). Exploring the status and critical issues in mixed methods research in doctoral nursing education in the Philippines. Journal of Professional Nursing, 50, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.10.008
Douglass, A. L. (2019). Leadership for quality early childhood education and care. OECD Education Working Papers, 211, 0_1-31. https://doi.org/10.1787/6e563bae-en
Egert, F., Fukkink, R. G., & Eckhardt, A. G. (2018). Impact of In-Service Professional Development Programs for Early Childhood Teachers on Quality Ratings and Child Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 401433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751918
Engdahl, A., & Sundin, A. (2018). Step by step towards quality preschools in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study based on preschool teachers perceptions, Degree Project for Preschool Teacher Program, 15.0 Credits, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1278963/FULLTEXT01.pdf
ERKE, V. I., Bubnova, I. S., Tatarinova, L. V., Berinskaya, I. V., & Babitskaya, L. A. (2019). The leadership problem and style of managing the pedagogical staff of pre-school educational organization. Revista Espacios, 40(08), 30-38. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n08/a19v40n08p30
Frimpong, S. O. (2021). The Role of Teaching and Learning Materials and Interaction as a Tool to Quality Early Childhood Education in Agona East District of the Central Region of Ghana. African Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 168-178. DOI: 10.30918/AERJ.91.20.112
Fujisawa, K. K., Fukai, T., & Nakamuro, M. (2023). Quality of early childhood education and care in Japanese accredited nursery centers: A study using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Third Edition (ECERS-3). PloS One, 18(2), e0281635e0281635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281635
Fonsn, E., & Soukainen, U. (2020). Sustainable Pedagogical Leadership in Finnish Early Childhood Education (ECE): An Evaluation by ECE Professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 213222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00984-y
Gupta, A. (2018). How neoliberal globalization is shaping early childhood education policies in India, China, Singapore, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Policy Futures in Education, 16(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317715796Halttunen, L., & Waniganayake, M. (2021). Views from the Inside: Roles of Deputy Directors in Early Childhood Education in Finland. Education Sciences, 11(11), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110751Harrington, E. M., Trevino, S. D., Lopez, S., & Giuliani, N. R. (2020). Emotion regulation in early childhood: Implications for socioemotional and academic components of school readiness. emotion (Washington, D.C.), 20(1), 4853. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000667
Jean-Napoleon, T. J. (2022). Early Childhood Administrators Leadership Style and Its Influence on Early Childhood Programs. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2728172908?pq origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
Joo, Y. S., Magnuson, K., Duncan, G. J., Schindler, H. S., Yoshikawa, H., & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2020). What works in early childhood education programs: A meta-analysis of preschool enhancement programs. Early Education and Development, 31(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1624146
Kazu, I. Y., & Is, A. (2018). An investigation about actualization levels of learning outcomes in early childhood curriculum. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 66-77. doi:10.11114/jets. v6i3.2928
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030Klem, N.-R., Shields, N., Smith, A., & Bunzli, S. (2022). Demystifying qualitative research for musculoskeletal practitioners part 4: A qualitative researchers toolkit-sampling, data collection methods, and data analysis. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 52(1), 810. https://doi.org/10.2519/JOSPT.2022.10486
Landry, S. H., Zucker, T. A., Williams, J. M., Merz, E. C., Guttentag, C. L., & Taylor, H. B. (2017). Improving school readiness of high-risk preschoolers: Combining high quality instructional strategies with responsive training for teachers and parents. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 40, 3851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.12.001Love, H. R. (2021). Administrators as heterotopia architects: supporting expansive possibilities of inclusive early childhood education. Young Exceptional Children, 24(3), 138153. https://doi.org/10.1177/10962506211018968
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). 3351-33514. URL: http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
Melhuish, E., & Gardiner, J. (2019). Structural factors and policy change as related to the quality of early childhood education and care for 34-year-olds in the UK. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00035
Monday, T. U. (2019). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Science, 1(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.1.1_2Mukunthan, T. (2021). Preschool, Jeevanathy Kalai Aham. Nelliady. Sri Lanka.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Ntumi, S. (2016). Challenges pre-School teachers face in the implementation of the early childhood curriculum in the cape coast metropolis. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 54-62. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1089727
ztabak, M. ., & Polatlar, D. Y. (2020). An Overview of the administrative issues in preschools from preschool teachers perspectives. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(6), 183-195. URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n6p183
Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning through play at school: A framework for policy and practice. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 7(2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Pathirana, B. D. (2017a). Evolution of early childhood care and development (ECCD) in Sri Lanka: Analysis of the state responsibility. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 3(6), 37-43. https://www.academia.edu/34606166
Pathirana, B. D. D. (2017b). Profile of early childhood care & Education (ECCD) in Sri Lanka: Analysis of the past and present. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(5). 1372- 1380. doi:10.21474/IJAR01/4258
Pathirana, B. D. D. (2017c). Early violence prevention in Sri Lankan preschools: Perceived preschool teacher practices. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4). 74-88. doi: 10.25215/0404.107
Peel, K. L. (2020). A beginner's guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 25(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/ryr5-k983
Perera, Y., Amarasinghe, K. U., Alahapperuma, S., Siriwardane, A., & Munasinghe, M. (2019). National guidelines and minimum standards for child development centres in Sri Lanka. National child protection authority ministry of women, child affairs and social empowerment. Child Protection source. https://childprotection.gov.lk/images/news/national-guidelines--minimum-standards-for-CDC-in-SL-e
Queirs, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European journal of education studies, 3(9), 369- 387. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Raikes, A., Rao, N., Yoshikawa, H., Cohrssen, C., Behrman, J., et al. (2023). Global tracking of access and quality in early childhood care and education. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 17(14), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-023-00116-5
PLN Randima Rajapaksha. (2016). Promoting oral language skills in preschool children through sociodramatic play in the classroom. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.1p.15
Rasyad, A., Wiyono, B. B., Zulkarnain, & Sucipto. (2019). The determinant factors that influence results of gradual training of early childhood education teachers based on the program evaluation in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1702840-. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1702840
Regnault, A., Willgoss, T., & Barbic, S. (2018). Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2(1), 1919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
Rice, S., Winter, S. R., Doherty, S., & Milner, M. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of using internet-based survey methods in aviation-related research. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 7(1), 58-65. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jate
RODRGUEZ-CARRILLO, J., MRIDA-SERRANO, R., GONZLEZ-ALFAYA, M. E & Espaa, U.C. (2022). High-quality early childhood teaching: Review of Specialized Research. Human Review, 13(2). 25-37. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4027.
Sahoo, R. K. (2022). Interview as a tool for data collection in educational research. Tools of Data Collection in Educational Research. https://www. Research gate. net/publication/360313105_Interview_as_a_Tool_for_Data_Collection_in_Educational_Research.
Seth, S., Chadha, N. K., & Bhatia, H. (2022). Qualitative Methods: A Practical Journey into Research. Friends Publications (India).
Shafiq, M. N., Devercelli, A., & Valerio, A. (2018). Are there long-term benefits from early childhood education in low- and middle-income countries? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(122), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3239
Scott, C. H. (2022). The Relationship between Early Childhood Education and Care Teachers Educational Qualifications and Classroom Quality. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, 17-37. file:///Users/balasoba/Downloads/Terry%20et%20al.%20in%20Willig%20and%20Stainton%20Rogers-2
UNICEF. (2023). Education in early childhood. https://www.unicef.org/srilanka/education-early-childhood#:~:text=Sri%20Lanka's%20patchwork%20of%20preschool,from%20realizing%20their%20full%20potential.
Usman, Y. D. (2016). Educational resources: An integral component for effective school administration in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(13), 27-37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578024
Warnasuriya, R., Sosale, S., & Dey, S. (2020). Integrating Early Childhood Care and Education in Sri Lanka: From Global Evidence to National Action. World Bank Publications. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1618-5
World Bank. (2014, June). Laying the Foundation for Early Childhood Education in Sri Lanka, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a4a2e2f4-c8f1-53c8-a4b2-ba7472d5c690/content
World Bank. (2019, August 30). Laying the foundation for early childhood education Sri Lanka. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/srilanka/publication/laying-foundation-early-childhood-education-sri-lanka
Yong-ping, Yu. (2017). Early childhood curriculum development in China. Early childhood education in Chinese societies, 19, 101-110. DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1004-4_7