Question: Mandating SMS implementation for manufacturers (Both design and production organisations).
Question: Mandating SMS implementation for manufacturers (Both design and production organisations).
Write an argumentative/persuasive essay about the approach should be taken by the regulatory authorities to mandate the SMS implementation for aircraft, engine and propeller manufacturers as per ICAO Annex 19. Develop your arguments and position further to assess if such requirements to be extended to organisations beyond aircraft, engine and propeller manufacturers as currently stated in ICAO Annex 19 (i.e., first and second tier suppliers).
In the existing practical point of view, design and production organisations in aircraft/its components manufacturing have been conducting extensive hazard identification and risk management as part of Safety Assessment of systems and structures during the type certification process. Discuss what additional process requirements as part of SMS implementation
How can the SMS implementation impact the existing model for type certification (Compliance with EASA CS 25.1309) considering the relationship with first and second tier suppliers?
Introduction
Why safety is required in air transport? Evolution of safety requirement from mid 70s to early 90s. Who is ICAO? What ICAO have done for safe air transportation? How ICAO member states implement ICAO SARPs?
What is SMS? Why it is relevant? Which part of aviation industry SMS implemented till now as part of mandatory requirement? why SMS implementation is necessary in type design and production organisation in aircraft and engine manufacturing and their first and second tier suppliers? (For design organisation in aircraft/engine manufacturing, the faulty design b737 max crash, 787 battery issues, risk characteristics early in design phase which can affect safety of aircraft when the aircraft in service or until full life cycle of aircraft.
For production organisation in aircraft/engine manufacturing, the safety culture, safety assurance, safety promotion,safety performance monitoring etc)
Question 1, 2 and 3 covering following topics;ICAO FRAME WORK FOR SMS and Member States implementation status
What is Annex 19? How they made it? Why it is relevant? What are the four main components of SMS? What are the manuals based on which ICAO Annex19 introduced? What is the status of regulations regarding the implementation of SMS in aircraft and engine manufacturing and their first and second tier suppliers? Specially mention what EASA, FAA, UKCAA, TCCA,CASA, DASA,ANAC authorities did to implement ICAO Annex 19 for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers (Latest news/ regulation related to implementation of SMS for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers )
Current process in design organisations and production organisations. Links between safety assurance/ quality assurance. In the current process the design and production have been conducting extensive hazard identification and risk management as part of Safety Assessment of systems and structures during the type certification process. How effective the current process? Is that the reason behind 737Max failure? Or the production suspension of b787?
Proposed impact after implementation of SMS for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers. What will be the changes in type certification process (compliance with EASA CS 25.1309) considering the relationship with first and second tier suppliers? What is EASA CS25.1309 requirement.
Write few sentences how the implementation of SMS may introduce some new terminology and some level of bureaucracy without adding much value.
Finally end with Conclusion
Do u support the SMS IMPLEMENTATION? What are the benefits of SMS Implementation in
aircraft/engine design organisation,
aircraft/engine production organisation,first and second tier suppliers
Question: Mandating SMS implementation for manufacturers (Both design and production organisations).
Write an argumentative/persuasive essay about the approach should be taken by the regulatory authorities to mandate the SMS implementation for aircraft, engine and propeller manufacturers as per ICAO Annex 19. Develop your arguments and position further to assess if such requirements to be extended to organisations beyond aircraft, engine and propeller manufacturers as currently stated in ICAO Annex 19 (i.e., first and second tier suppliers).
In the existing practical point of view, design and production organisations in aircraft/its components manufacturing have been conducting extensive hazard identification and risk management as part of Safety Assessment of systems and structures during the type certification process. Discuss what additional process requirements as part of SMS implementation
How can the SMS implementation impact the existing model for type certification (Compliance with EASA CS 25.1309) considering the relationship with first and second tier suppliers?
Introduction
Why safety is required in air transport? Evolution of safety requirement from mid 70s to early 90s. Who is ICAO? What ICAO have done for safe air transportation? How ICAO member states implement ICAO SARPs?
What is SMS? Why it is relevant? Which part of aviation industry SMS implemented till now as part of mandatory requirement? why SMS implementation is necessary in type design and production organisation in aircraft and engine manufacturing and their first and second tier suppliers? (For design organisation in aircraft/engine manufacturing, the faulty design b737 max crash, 787 battery issues, risk characteristics early in design phase which can affect safety of aircraft when the aircraft in service or until full life cycle of aircraft.
For production organisation in aircraft/engine manufacturing, the safety culture, safety assurance, safety promotion,safety performance monitoring etc)
Question 1, 2 and 3 covering following topics;ICAO FRAME WORK FOR SMS and Member States implementation status
What is Annex 19? How they made it? Why it is relevant? What are the four main components of SMS? What are the manuals based on which ICAO Annex19 introduced? What is the status of regulations regarding the implementation of SMS in aircraft and engine manufacturing and their first and second tier suppliers? Specially mention what EASA, FAA, UKCAA, TCCA,CASA, DASA,ANAC authorities did to implement ICAO Annex 19 for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers (Latest news/ regulation related to implementation of SMS for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers )
Current process in design organisations and production organisations. Links between safety assurance/ quality assurance. In the current process the design and production have been conducting extensive hazard identification and risk management as part of Safety Assessment of systems and structures during the type certification process. How effective the current process? Is that the reason behind 737Max failure? Or the production suspension of b787?
Proposed impact after implementation of SMS for aircraft and engine manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers. What will be the changes in type certification process (compliance with EASA CS 25.1309) considering the relationship with first and second tier suppliers? What is EASA CS25.1309 requirement.
Write few sentences how the implementation of SMS may introduce some new terminology and some level of bureaucracy without adding much value.
Finally end with Conclusion
Do u support the SMS IMPLEMENTATION? What are the benefits of SMS Implementation in
aircraft/engine design organisation,
aircraft/engine production organisation,first and second tier suppliers
