Report 3500 words
Assessment
Report 3500 words
Assessment type: Report
Deadline: For documents to be uploaded Deadline Sunday 19 May 2024 by 23:59 all report to be uploaded.
Referencing convention: Harvard (for guidance see http://www.bathspa.ac.uk/referencing)
Submit via: Online only; via the relevant TurnItIn portal under the Assessment folder in Moodle
Proportion of overall module mark: 100%
Feedback: 21 June 2024
Assessment Details:
A 3,500-word report where you identify Financial Management related challenges in your own organisation where you have worked before or an organisation of your choice and how you as a leader you could resolve each of them. The report should provide a critical evaluation of the Financial Management challenges based on the topic covered within this module, relevant theories, prior studies and professional sources.
You do not need to cover all of the topics which will be taught but you must keep to module content. Independent reading and wider research of articles related to the topics recommended. If you mention any specific people within your organisation please use pseudonyms.
You need to demonstrate a sound knowledge of the relevant academic literature/ theoretical concepts and write this critical analytical report showing the current position and your recommendation for change.
Format
It should not be more than 3,500 words (+/- 10%) in total - this word limit excludes title, contents page, appendices and references.
Please include the tables, charts and diagrams in the appendices and cross reference them within the main report. This way you can avoid them being included within the word limit.
All sources should be properly referenced using the Harvard system.
Submission Details
To be submitted by Sunday 19 May 2024 by 23:59.
You will only submit an electronic copy via Turnitin on Moodle. This will be the document that will be marked and will be checked for plagiarism
To do this, you should click on the essay button on the modules Minerva site and use the view/complete button to submit this piece of work
If you are unable to complete the assignment by the submission date and, due to extenuating circumstances, wish to request an extension, then you must contact Nilashis (me) as soon as you can, about your request.
The marking criteria for this assignment are below. Please read them since they outlined how your assignment will be assessed and graded.
This assignment represents 100% of the total marks for this module.
Marking Grid:
0% 39% 40% 49% 50% 59% 60% 69% 70% 84% 85% 100%
Understanding of key concepts and theories.
You do not understand the meanings of these key concepts and are unable to use them appropriately in your analysis. There is no evidence that you have researched them. Your understanding of these key concepts is often basic and undeveloped and there is no evidence that you made a meaningful effort to research them. You frequently reply on lecture notes. Your understanding of these key concepts is sound and there is some evidence of research through reading some of the principal textbooks. You have a good understanding of these concepts with some evidence of research. You have a very good understanding of these concepts based upon solid efforts by you to research a wide range of appropriate sources. You have an excellent critical understanding of these key concepts based upon extended efforts by you to research a comprehensive range of appropriate sources
Knowledge of business/ businesses and their Strategy towards Financial Management
Your knowledge of the businesses is superficial and rudimentary and you rely on few inappropriate sources.
You have used some appropriate sources, but your knowledge of the businesses still lacks depth and apt insights. Your knowledge of the businesses is sound but pedestrian, still lacks depth and apt insights. You have used appropriate sources and your knowledge of the businesses is good. You have a very good understanding of the businesses and you are able to identify clearly their most significant features and trends. You rely of several reliable sources.
You have an excellent understanding of the businesses and you are able to identify clearly their most significant features and trends. You demonstrate that you have investigated all of the most important sources.
Evaluation and critical analysis
There is no evaluation or critique in your analysis in your Report and it is entirely descriptive. You are unable to use the key concepts appropriately and meaningfully in your critical analysis. Your Report is therefore largely descriptive. You are able to use the key concepts to make sense of your data, although this critical analysis lacks depth and real insights. You are able to use the key concepts to generate some insights but your analysis still lacks depth. You are able to use the key concepts to generate solid and reliable insights into the topic. Flair and a good level of skill is demonstrated in this critical analysis You are able to use the key concepts to generate original insights into the topic. A high level of skill is demonstrated in this critical analysis.
Presentation and referencing
Your report lacks a sound structure and clarity and its referencing is careless. There are plenty of instances of poor spelling and grammar. Its overall presentation is untidy and unprofessional. Your report lacks in places a sound structure and there is some poor referencing. There are several examples of weak spelling and grammar and the overall presentation is uninspiring.
Your report is well structured, although it lacks clarity in places. It does not contain many spellings, grammatical and referencing errors and the overall presentation is of a good standard. The reports overall structure is sound and it develops a clear and logical argument to an extent. The spelling, grammar and referencing is good and the overall presentation is
of a good standard The reports overall structure is good and it develops a clear and logical argument. The spelling, grammar and referencing is good and the overall presentation is professional
There is no spelling, grammatical and referencing errors in the report and overall presentation is highly professional and impressive.