Rubric
- Subject Code :
ITR5001
- University :
University of Sydney Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
Risk and Technology
Assessment 2
Rubric
This assessment task represents 60% of the assessment for this subject and is
SLO | Task | Exemplary 100% | Highly proficient 75% | Meets expectation 50% | Below expectation 25% | Incorrect attempt 0% | No attempt 0% | Total |
Task 4: | ||||||||
1, 4 | LMS ROW 5 Review the relevant tabs in Appendix C, and interpret the results of each data analysis: i) Determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between the average weekly volume of wine sold as cleanskin before the CellarAI trial and after CellarAI was implemented. ii) Determine whether there is a potential relationship between the volume of wine sold as cleanskin and revenue earned. | LMS ROW 5 Provides an accurate interpretation of two (2) numerical analyses. Interpretation is strongly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 5 Provides an accurate interpretation of two (2) numerical analyses. Interpretation is mostly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 5 Provides an accurate interpretation of one (1) numerical analysis. Interpretation is strongly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 5 Provides an accurate interpretation of one (1) numerical analysis. Interpretation is mostly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 5 Incorrect attempt. | LMS ROW 5 No attempt. | /8 |
SLO | Task | Exemplary 100% | Highly proficient 75% | Meets expectation 50% | Below expectation 25% | Incorrect attempt 0% | No attempt 0% | Total |
Task 5: | ||||||||
1, 4 | LMS ROW 6 John believes that there is more analysis that can be done to provide insight into the effectiveness of CellarAI. Provide two (2) unique additional data analysis questions and explain why these would be relevant to HWL in generating insight into the effectiveness of CellarAI. You do not need to perform the analyses. | LMS ROW 6 Provides two (2) unique data analysis questions. Provides sufficient explanation as to why these questions are relevant. Responses are strongly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 6 Provides two (2) unique data analysis questions. Provides an explanation as to why these questions are relevant. Responses are mostly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 6 Provides one (1) unique data analysis question. Provides sufficient explanation as to why this question is relevant. Response is strongly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 6 Provides one (1) unique data analysis question. Provides an explanation as to why this question is relevant. Response is mostly related to the facts of the case study. | LMS ROW 6 Incorrect attempt. | LMS ROW 6 No attempt. | /8 |
SLO | Task | Exemplary 100% | Highly proficient 75% | Meets expectation 50% | Below expectation 25% | Incorrect attempt 0% | No attempt 0% | Total |
Task 6: | ||||||||
1, 3, 4 | LMS ROW 7 Using the information you have collected from the other tasks, recommend to John if HWL should adopt CellarAI. | LMS ROW 7 Provides a comprehensive, convincing and justified recommendation with reference to response of previous tasks. | LMS ROW 7 Provides a mostly clear, convincing and justified recommendation with reference to responses of previous tasks. | LMS ROW 7 Provides a recommendation that is appropriate, but the justification is unclear or has limited references to response of previous tasks. | LMS ROW 7 Provides a recommendation but the justification is unclear and poorly aligned with responses of previous tasks. | LMS ROW 7 Incorrect attempt. | LMS ROW 7 No attempt. | /8 |
