Social Exclusion and Advocacy in Social Work SWK3025

Introduction

Within Australia, it can be observed that the group of people who are also identified as income assistance recipients must deal with social exclusion issues. This also comprises ongoing discrimination, historical dispossession, fewer accesses to standard quality healthcare and education, restricted employment opportunities, and others (APH Gov, 2024). Advocacy should be facilitated by social workers for policies and programs that influence culturally suitable services and maximize funding. The report will constitute institutional and social arrangements followed by potential factors that lead to the social exclusion of income assistance recipients within Australia. It also discusses social workers' major responsibility and role in influencing procedures or policies to minimize or eliminate these inequalities.

Background and Discussion

Institutional and social arrangements and their impact on the group

Social arrangements like welfare programs shall make a great contribution to marginalization and social inclusion following a wide range of ways. These comprise restriction of freedoms and rights on the disadvantaged population groups who rely on them for specific purposes like income assistance making them hopeless and stressed. The second factor includes the creation of latest systems of regulations or rules which people living in a particular community are bound to follow and can further result in stereotypes and social stigma (Temple et al. 2019). Additional factors include fragmented support systems or networks which arrive from population movements and are visible creating an impact on the population groups support networks and structures. Institutions factors have also failed to deliver sufficient support to obstruct individuals from getting inclined into poverty as they deliver structural limitations. No sufficient jobs are available for individuals who are interested in paid work (Liu et al. 2023). Specifically, it can be found that there are some individuals who are currently employed yet have the necessity of having paid work on a greater level. Institutional arrangements showcases informal and formal institutions can oppress and marginalize people which can create an adverse impact on the groups well-being and mental health. Besides this, marginalized group of people also have to cross different cycles with significant deterioration in mental well-being and health. In the later stages of seeking income assistance, these recipients can be found suffering from isolation and oppression which thereafter makes the entire process difficult to escape. In addition, essential services and housing costs are also highly rising. Therefore, people who are seeking income assistance have the necessity of houses (Kidd 2017). This is because these people need a safe and stable place to raise their families, stay healthy, and visit their families.

Factors leading to social exclusion among income assistance recipients

Social exclusion around Australia in relation to social work practice and policy can be known as the circumstance when an individual shows inability to participate completely in society because of a wide range of overlapping issues like poor health, unemployment, insufficient education, discrimination and others. The multidimensional procedure results in inclusion and exclusion cycle thereby causing inequality in providing access to sufficient resources, rights and competencies. Social exclusion has connectedness to social work and social policy primarily within the field of education (Mendes & Roche, 2023). Within the year 2018, leavers of early school were two times more likely to deal with social exclusion issues as compared to people who have finished their 12th Year. The other factor for socially excluded groups includes getting subjected to racism. In 2010, it was established by the Australian Commission of Human Rights that exclusion of people can occur from racism to access services along with taking active participation within society. The second aspect, marginalization is basically a social aspect that denotes systematic and inequality limitations and is being dealt by few groups of individuals like income assistance recipients within the society of Australia. Inadequate funding and historical bias are two key factors which result in causing unequal relations of power. Advocacy and social justice is promoted by the Australian Social Workers Association for marginalized and vulnerable individuals like income assistance recipients. The Code of Ethics of AASW is dependent on offering respect for individuals, social justice and professional excellence. The social security system within Australia shall be considered a wider part in marginalization in relation to the social protection system (Servicesaustralia, 2024). It comprises direct expenditure on infrastructure and services which include community services, educational and health services and the system of superannuation complementing the pension of age in the retirement income system of Australia.

Role of social workers to eliminate or reduce these inequalities

Social workers need to develop a comprehensive approach to mitigate or remove social exclusion issues among income assistance recipients. This shall collaborate with various not-for-profit organizations and the government system to bring policy-level and technical change. Enabling investment within greater coverage can potentially minimize exclusion from schemes of social protection (Schultz et al. 2023). Considering this group's status, it has been argued by the political theory that higher schemes of coverage, that incorporate individuals surrounding wealth groups, create higher political assistance together with coalitions of cross-class that pressurize to attain greater budgets. Social workers will be required to consult with politicians in this scenario as they are engaged more in the allocation of funds and produce schemes that include people with higher political influence. Besides this, social workers can operate together with policymakers to develop and make innovative changes within the policy of social protection. Standard quality analysis evaluating the necessities of this vulnerable group who are at higher social exclusion risk shall be directed by this policy (Carson & Kerr 2020). For instance, it is vital to design questions by conducting household surveys nationally that provide an allowance to policymakers and analysts to recognize and evaluate the population groups' circumstances who are at major risk.

Conclusion

The relatively greater income support levels by continuing the payment policy of Age Pension could obtain a protective impact on poverty, food security, marginalization, or other social exclusion-oriented issues. Australia's social security system has the intention to maximize the population's well-being by distributing revenue of the government generated within the tax system specifically to families and individuals. Further, to eliminate social exclusion, the Government of Australia is likely to increase the NewStart rate and connected payments. If the NewStart Allowance is increased to $800every single night within Australia, it would potentially minimize the gap in poverty by nearly 11%.

Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back!

Exam Question Bankis your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects. Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.

To connect with expert and ask your query click hereExam Question Bank