Task 2: Understanding of the role of consultation (20 Marks - Complete)
Task 2: Understanding of the role of consultation (20 Marks - Complete)
Comment on how the consultation was managed effectively for the new health campaign.
Campaign.
To carry out consultation in a safety campaign is a very essential approach. It greatly helps the process to be effective with relevance to its stake holders as well be accepted. For the campaign to be as effective as required, it calls planning, communicating, as well as engagement with every stake holder involved during the campaign process. Therefore, below is the direction taken to ensure the effectiveness of managing the newly introduced safety campaign?
A consultation plan was developed at the start of the campaign, which included clear objectives, timelines, and methods for engaging stakeholders to help out in trucking should there be a hitch.
The consultation plan was communicated to all stakeholders, including community groups, healthcare providers, and other relevant organizations so that they are part of the process.
A range of consultation methods was used, including surveys, focus groups, and individual interviews, to gather feedback from stakeholders. This was to ensure wider coverage of the process.
The consultation process was inclusive, ensuring that all stakeholders had the opportunity to participate and provide feedback to allow for devise views among the members.
The consultation process was transparent, with clear information provided to stakeholders on how their feedback would be used. This was to make easy flowing by interested parties wishing to truck the process in individual capacity if any.
Feedback from stakeholders was analyzed and used to inform the development of the campaign strategy and materials.
Stakeholders were given the opportunity to review and provide feedback on campaign materials before they were finalized. This was to ensure no
The consultation process was ongoing throughout the campaign, with feedback used to refine and improve the campaign as it progressed.
Regular updates were provided to stakeholders on the progress of the campaign and how their feedback was being incorporated.
The consultation process was evaluated at the end of the campaign to identify areas for improvement in future campaigns.
Stakeholders were consulted on the target audience for the campaign, ensuring that it was relevant and engaging.
Consultation process was used to identify the key messages and communication channels that would be most effective in reaching the target audience.
Healthcare providers were consulted on the best ways to integrate the campaign into their practices and support their patients.
Community groups were consulted on how they could support the campaign and help to spread the message to cover a wider coverage.
Feedback from stakeholders was used to tailor the campaign to the local context, taking into account cultural and social factors.
The consultation process was designed to be accessible to all stakeholders, including those with disabilities or limited literacy.
Stakeholders were provided with clear and concise information on the campaign objectives, key messages, and expected outcomes.
The consultation process was managed by a dedicated team with expertise in consultation and stakeholder engagement.
The team responsible for managing the consultation process had the support and backing of senior management within the organization.
Consultation methods were chosen based on the specific needs of different stakeholder groups, ensuring that the feedback was meaningful and relevant.
Feedback from stakeholders was analyzed using a systematic approach, ensuring that all comments were captured and addressed.
The consultation process was used to build partnerships with stakeholders, creating a sense of ownership and collaboration.
Stakeholders were given the opportunity to provide ongoing feedback throughout the campaign, allowing for continuous improvement.
The consultation process was used to identify potential barriers to the campaign's success and develop strategies to overcome them.
The consultation process was seen as an integral part of the campaign development process, with stakeholders viewed as partners in achieving the campaign objectives.
Task 3: Measuring and monitoring
It is the SMTs view that the reduction in accident frequency rate alone clearly indicates that the slips and trips campaign was a success.
(a) Discuss possible limitations of this view ((14 Marks - Complete)The use of accident frequency rate (AFR) as the sole measure to determine the success of a safety campaign, such as the slips and trips campaign, may have limitations that need to be considered. While reducing the AFR is undoubtedly an essential goal, it is essential to note that the reduction in AFR does not necessarily indicate that the slips and trips campaign was entirely successful. In this essay, we will explore some of the potential limitations of this view.
Firstly, AFR only measures accidents that have already occurred. While it is essential to track incidents to identify trends and areas for improvement, relying solely on this measure may overlook the near-misses and hazards that have been identified and eliminated through proactive measures. For example, if employees are reporting potential hazards more frequently, it suggests that the safety culture has improved, and risks are being identified before accidents occur. However, this improvement may not be reflected in the AFR.
Secondly, AFR may not be an accurate measure of the true safety performance of an organization. The AFR calculation only takes into account the number of accidents in a specific period, usually a year, and the total hours worked by the employees. However, this calculation does not consider other factors that may influence the AFR, such as changes in workforce size, work activities, or reporting practices. For example, if an organization downsizes its workforce or outsources some activities, the AFR may appear lower, even if the underlying risks have not changed.
Thirdly, the AFR may not capture all accidents that occur in the workplace. For example, if an employee has an accident outside working hours, but the injury is related to their work activities, this may not be captured in the AFR calculation. Similarly, if an employee experiences long-term health effects related to their work activities, such as back pain from heavy lifting, this may not be captured in the AFR calculation, as it only measures accidents that result in a specific type of harm, such as injury or illness.
Fourthly, AFR does not provide information about the severity of the accidents that occur. While reducing the number of accidents is undoubtedly a positive outcome, it is also essential to consider the severity of the accidents that do occur. For example, if the organization experiences a reduction in the number of accidents, but the severity of the accidents increases, this may indicate that the organization is not adequately addressing the underlying risks.
Long-term effects: The reduction in accident frequency rate may be temporary, and it is important to assess the long-term effects of the campaign to determine its true success. It may be necessary to conduct follow-up studies to assess whether the reduction in accident frequency rate persists over time.
Unreported accidents: The reduction in accident frequency rate may only reflect the number of reported accidents, and it is possible that some accidents are not reported. Therefore, it is important to consider other measures of safety, such as near misses, to determine the overall effectiveness of the campaign.
Accident request rate is mainly has priced reward attached at the end of proposed or targeted rate. Employee may tend interpret the approach to only attain the proposed incident rate to claim the reward not as a way of conducting themselves going forward.
Short-term focus: The reduction in accident frequency rate may be a short-term improvement and may not be sustained over the long term. Therefore, it is important to monitor safety performance over a longer period to determine the sustainability of the improvement.
Limited scope: The accident frequency rate only measures slips and trips, and does not consider other types of accidents such as falls from height or machinery-related accidents. Therefore, it is important to consider other measures of safety performance that capture a broader range of accident types.
Timeframe: The Senior Management's view only considers the short-term reduction in accident frequency rate as an indicator of success. However, a longer timeframe may be required to determine if the safety campaign has had a lasting impact on reducing accidents.
Failure to consider root causes: The Senior Management's view does not consider the root causes of accidents, which may be related to factors other than slips and trips, such as inadequate training or equipment.
Incomplete analysis: The Senior Management's view does not consider the cost of the safety campaign, which may be significant, and whether the reduction in accidents justifies the investment made in the campaign.
Employee engagement: The Senior Management's view does not consider the level of employee engagement in the safety campaign, which can have a significant impact on its success. If employees do not feel involved in the campaign, they may not fully embrace its goals and objectives.
Limited data: The Senior Management's view only considers accident frequency rate as a measure of success, which is limited to the number of accidents that occur. This does not account for the severity of accidents or near misses that may have occurred but were not reported.
Causality: It is essential to decide whether the decrease in mishap recurrence rate is straightforwardly connected to the slips and outings crusade or then again in the event that it is because of different factors like changes in work strategies, workplace, or the utilization of individual defensive gear (PPE). The decrease in mishap recurrence rate might be the consequence of a mix of variables, and it is fundamental to recognize the underlying driver to precisely credit the outcome of the mission.
Representative Criticism: The Senior Supervisory group ought to likewise consider worker input to decide the viability of the mission. While the decrease in mishap recurrence rate might recommend that the mission was fruitful, it is vital to decide if the workers accept that the slips and excursions crusade was useful in raising their familiarity with risks and assuming it urged them to change their ways of behaving to keep away from slips and outings.
Seasonal factors: The reduction could have been a result of seasonal or other factors unrelated to the campaign. For example, in the mining sector in process plants, during the rainy season it becomes muddy and operations are stopped for hours or days to allow the areas to dry up. Such times are not captured or reflected in the accident frequent rate approach.
None significant of AFR: The reduction may not be significant enough to indicate that the campaign was a success, as the rate may still remain above the ideal safety standard. It might be that incident have reduced which is not, for example it might have been 1 incident in a proposed time but its a disabling accident triggering heft law suits or compensation.
The campaign may have had different effects in different departments or locations, indicating that its success may be limited. There areas in the plant which has less exposure to hazardous conditions as compared to others, for example control operators or offices based employees. The AFR dose take account technics wholly focus on the reduced number of accidents per head count.
In conclusion, the statement by SMT that the slips and trips campaign was a success based on the reduction in accident frequency rate alone may have some limitations and merits. Limitations could include potential confounding factors or biases that were not accounted for, as well as the possibility that other factors may have contributed to the reduction in accident frequency rate. On the other hand, the merit of this view is that it acknowledges the importance of the slips and trips campaign in promoting safety and reducing accidents in the workplace. However, a more comprehensive analysis that takes into account other factors and potential limitations would be necessary to provide a more accurate assessment of the campaign's impact on safety in the workplace.
(b) Possible merits of the view that the reduction in accident frequency rate alone clearly indicates that the slips and trips campaign was a success could include:
Direct measure of success: The reduction in accident frequency rate is a direct measure of the success of the campaign in reducing accidents. It is a tangible outcome that can be easily tracked and monitored.
Cost-effective: Measuring accident frequency rate is a cost-effective way to assess the success of the campaign. It does not require a significant investment of resources or time, making it an attractive option for organizations with limited budgets.
Simple and easy to understand: Measuring accident frequency rate is a simple and easy-to-understand measure of safety. It is a straightforward way to communicate the success of the campaign to stakeholders, such as employees, management, and regulatory bodies.
Task 4: Measuring and monitoring
As the health and safety adviser, you want to improve manual handling safety. To do this they need to proactively monitor the activities.
Justify FOUR leading indicators that would help Bricks to Homes achieve this. ( 8 Marks Complete)
Training and Competence Assessment: This leading indicator involves monitoring the level of training and competence of employees who are involved in manual handling tasks. This includes ensuring that employees have received appropriate training on manual handling techniques and best practices. Regular assessment and training can ensure that employees are aware of the risks associated with manual handling tasks and understand how to perform these tasks safely. It can also help identify any gaps in their knowledge or skillset that may need to be addressed through additional training.
Risk Assessment and Control Measures: Conducting regular risk assessments is an important leading indicator as it helps identify potential hazards associated with manual handling tasks. By analyzing the risk factors, organizations can develop control measures to reduce the likelihood of injuries and accidents. Control measures can include things like redesigning workstations, adjusting loads, or providing employees with mechanical aids to reduce the amount of manual handling required.
Near Miss Reporting: Encouraging near-miss reporting is a valuable leading indicator as it helps organizations identify areas where manual handling safety can be improved. By analyzing these reports, organizations can identify trends and areas for improvement. Near miss reporting can also provide insight into potential incidents that can be prevented through proactive measures.
Employee Involvement: Involving employees in the process of improving manual handling safety is a critical leading indicator. This includes encouraging employees to share their concerns about manual handling tasks and involving them in risk assessments. Organizations can also provide employees with the necessary tools and training to ensure they are equipped to perform manual handling tasks safely. By creating a culture of safety where employees feel empowered to take an active role in reducing the risk of manual handling injuries, organizations can achieve a safer working environment.
Employee Feedback: Employees are a valuable source of information about manual handling safety. Gathering feedback from employees through surveys, focus groups, or other means can provide insights into the effectiveness of current safety measures and identify areas for improvement. Encouraging and acting on employee feedback can also help promote a culture of safety in the workplace.
Injury and Illness Rates: Tracking and analyzing injury and illness rates can help identify areas where improvements in manual handling safety are necessary. Examining the types of injuries and illnesses that occur, the circumstances surrounding them, and the severity of the injuries can help identify specific hazards and areas where targeted interventions are required to prevent similar incidents from occurring. Additionally, tracking injury and illness rates over time can help assess the effectiveness of interventions and identify areas where further improvements are necessary.
By tracking these leading indicators, 'Bricks to Homes' can proactively monitor activities related to manual handling safety and take appropriate measures to continuously improve their safety performance.
Task 5: Measuring and monitoring
Comment on the effectiveness of site inspections in monitoring health and safety performance at Bricks to Homes - (15 short )Site inspections are crucial in monitoring the health and safety performance of a workplace.
Inspections are an essential tool for monitoring health and safety performance at 'Bricks to Homes', as they provide firsthand observations of site conditions and activities, allowing for identification of potential hazards and non-compliance with health and safety regulations.
Site inspections may help identify any deficiencies or gaps in health and safety procedures at 'Bricks to Homes' and provide an opportunity for corrective actions to be taken promptly, thereby enhancing overall health and safety performance.
Regular site inspections can serve as a deterrent for non-compliance with health and safety policies at 'Bricks to Homes', as the knowledge that inspections are being conducted can encourage employees to adhere to established health and safety protocols.
Site inspections can facilitate communication and engagement between management, employees, and other stakeholders at 'Bricks to Homes', promoting awareness and accountability for health and safety performance.
However, the effectiveness of site inspections in monitoring health and safety performance at 'Bricks to Homes' may depend on the frequency, comprehensiveness, and consistency of the inspections, as well as the follow-up actions taken to address any identified issues.
It is crucial that site inspections are conducted by qualified and trained personnel who are knowledgeable about health and safety regulations, procedures, and best practices to ensure accurate assessments and appropriate corrective actions.
Site inspections should be complemented with other health and safety monitoring methods, such as incident reporting, safety audits, and employee feedback, to provide a comprehensive approach to health and safety performance monitoring at 'Bricks to Homes'.
Continuous improvement and regular review of the site inspection process at 'Bricks to Homes' should be implemented to address any limitations or shortcomings and ensure that it remains effective in monitoring health and safety performance over time.
Site inspections alone may not be sufficient in ensuring full compliance with health and safety regulations at 'Bricks to Homes'. It is essential to foster a culture of safety through training, communication, and accountability throughout the organization to enhance overall health and safety performance.
It is crucial to document and report the findings of site inspections at 'Bricks to Homes' accurately and promptly, and track the progress of corrective actions to ensure that identified issues are addressed in a timely and effective manner.
Site inspections should not be seen as a one-time event, but rather as an ongoing process to continually assess and monitor health and safety performance at 'Bricks to Homes', and to proactively identify and mitigate potential risks.
Site inspections can provide valuable data and insights on trends, patterns, and areas that may require additional focus or resources for health and safety improvement at 'Bricks to Homes', which can inform strategic decision-making and resource allocation.
Effective communication and feedback loops between site inspectors, management, and employees at 'Bricks to Homes' can facilitate the identification and resolution of health and safety issues, as well as promote a proactive approach to maintaining a safe and healthy work environment.
Site inspections can serve as evidence of due diligence in complying with health and safety regulations and may be required for regulatory compliance or legal purposes at 'Bricks to Homes'.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of site inspections in monitoring health and safety performance at 'Bricks to Homes' will depend on the commitment, engagement, and proactive efforts of the organization's management, employees, and stakeholders in prioritizing health and safety as a core value and integrating it into all aspects of the organization's operations.
Task 7: Societal factors
Based on the scenario only, how can societal factors influence health and safety priorities in Bricks to Homes? - (10 Marks Complete)
The top priorities for health and safety at Bricks to Homes, a construction company producing inexpensive dwellings in a developing nation, can be significantly influenced by social variables. The staff, the neighborhood, and the overall viability of the company's objective to provide safe and attainable housing are all impacted by these social issues.
Cultural norms and beliefs: The cultural norms and beliefs of the local community where 'Bricks to Homes' is implemented can influence health and safety priorities. For example, if the community prioritizes traditional building materials and techniques over modern construction methods, it may impact the adoption of safer construction practices. Similarly, if there are cultural beliefs that discourage the use of safety equipment or protective gear, it may affect the safety practices of the workers.
Economic conditions: Economic conditions of the local community can influence health and safety priorities. If the community is economically disadvantaged and lacks access to resources, it may impact the implementation of safety measures. For example, if there is limited budget for safety training or procurement of safety equipment, it may compromise the safety of workers.
Social structures: Social structures within the community, such as gender roles and hierarchies, can also impact health and safety priorities. For example, if there are gender-based divisions of labor in construction work and women are assigned tasks that are considered less hazardous, it may result in gender disparities in safety practices and exposure to risks.
Education and awareness: The level of education and awareness among the local community can impact health and safety priorities. If there is low literacy rates or lack of awareness about the importance of health and safety in construction, it may result in inadequate adoption of safety measures.
Legal and regulatory frameworks: The existing legal and regulatory frameworks related to health and safety in the construction industry can significantly influence the priorities in 'Bricks to Homes'. If there are weak or poorly enforced regulations, it may result in inadequate safety practices. Conversely, if there are stringent regulations and penalties for non-compliance, it may lead to better adherence to safety measures.
Social values and priorities: The social values and priorities of the local community can impact health and safety priorities. If the community values productivity and completion of construction projects over worker safety, it may result in compromises on safety practices. Conversely, if the community places a high value on worker welfare and safety, it may prioritize the implementation of robust health and safety measures in 'Bricks to Homes'.
The local community's culture and social norms are one social component that can affect the top priority for health and safety. Workers could be reluctant to take the required precautions to prevent illnesses or accidents on the workplace, for instance, if the community has cultural values that place a higher priority on labor than safety. On the other hand, if the society places a high value on health and safety, then employees may be more inclined to adhere to safety procedures and take the appropriate action to prevent accidents.
The level of education and awareness of the local workforce can also have an impact on health and safety goals. The relevance of safety regulations and the risks involved in construction work may not be adequately communicated to the workers if they lack knowledge of these topics. As a result, Bricks to Homes would have to spend money on educating their employees and spreading the word about the advantages and disadvantages of placing a priority on health and safety.
Social issues that affect health and safety priorities include access to healthcare and poverty. Workers may be less inclined to prioritize safety measures or report accidents and illnesses if they lack access to healthcare or cannot afford to get it. This could increase the likelihood that diseases or injuries go untreated, which could ultimately harm the company's ability to accomplish its objective.
It is likely that the social mores and values of the society in which Bricks to Homes operates could have an effect on the organization's primary purpose, which is to ensure the health and safety of the volunteers and staff that work for the organization. Bricks to Homes, for example, may priorities output and speed over worker safety if the community in which it operates places a high value on effectiveness and productivity in the workplace.
The choice of which component of health and safety receives the most priority may also be influenced by economic considerations such as the availability of finances, resources, and equipment. As a result, this exemplifies how the economics can play a role in the situation. In the event that the company has severe financial difficulties, Bricks to Homes may priorities the company's financial stability over the health and safety of its employees in order to save money.
Community Expectations: The local community's expectations and demands for safe and healthy living conditions can impact the priorities of 'Bricks to Homes.' If the community is vocal about their concerns regarding health and safety, it may influence the company's decisions in prioritizing measures such as proper ventilation, safe construction materials, and access to clean water.
Informal networks have the potential to have an effect on health and safety outcomes, and two examples of such networks are social support systems established in the community and inside families. Employees may be more willing to report safety hazards and fight for better working conditions, for instance, if they feel strongly supported by their families and communities. This could be because employees who feel strongly supported by their families and communities are more likely to report safety hazards. This is due to the fact that persons who have extensive social networks are typically accorded a higher level of trust by their families and the communities in which they live.
In general, social variables can have a big impact on Bricks to Homes' top concerns for health and safety. To guarantee that they are establishing a safe and healthy work environment for their employees and the local community, the company must take these elements into account while developing their safety standards and training their workforce.
(b) Based on the scenario only, explain why organizational factors led to violations occurring?
There are numerous factors that would have caused violations at Bricks to Home Company. The most factor leading to occurrence violation would include Organization structured, the policies and procedures in place, and the culture of the organization. Poorly managed organizations can fail too effectively monitor their employees and ensure they comply with regulations, leading to violations of laws, regulations, or policies. This can be due to a lack of training, an inadequate system of checks and balances, or a lack of oversight.
Organizational structure can play a role in violations occurring. If the structure is not designed to ensure proper oversight, employees may be able to violate laws, regulations, or policies without detection. For example, if the company has a large number of departments that operate independently from each other, it may be difficult for higher management to detect any violations. Additionally, if the company does not have a clear chain of command, employees may be able to violate laws, regulations, or policies without being held accountable.
Organizational policies and procedures can also influence violations occurring. If the policies and procedures are inadequate, employees may be unaware of the regulations and laws they must adhere to. Additionally, if the policies and procedures are not enforced, employees may be more likely to break them. If there is no clear consequence for violating policies, employees may be more likely to do so.
Lack of communication: There was a lack of communication between the workers and management, which led to the workers not being aware of the potential hazards. This lack of communication also meant that workers did not report issues or incidents.
Inadequate training: The workers were not provided with adequate training to identify and handle potential hazards. This lack of training meant that the workers were not aware of the proper safety procedures.
Inadequate supervision: The supervisors did not adequately supervise the workers, which led to workers taking unnecessary risks and ignoring safety procedures.
Pressure to meet production targets: There was pressure on workers to meet the targets of removing poles since the supervisor mentioned of the task to being behind scheduled which led to shortcuts being taken and safety procedures being ignored.
High workload and time pressure: If employees are under significant workload and time pressure, they may prioritize completing tasks quickly over following proper procedures. This can result in shortcuts being taken, leading to potential violations.
Inadequate resources: If an organization does not provide employees with the necessary resources, such as tools, equipment, or staffing levels, to perform their jobs effectively, employees may resort to taking unauthorized actions to compensate for the deficiency. This can result in violations as employees try to find ways to meet their job demands.
Organizational culture: If the organizational culture does not prioritize compliance and ethical behavior, employees may feel that cutting corners or bending the rules is acceptable or even encouraged. This can create a permissive environment where violations are more likely to occur.
Incentives and rewards: If the organization has a reward or incentive system that prioritizes productivity or performance over compliance, employees may feel pressured to prioritize achieving targets or meeting goals over adhering to rules and regulations. This can lead to violations as employees try to meet the incentivized targets at the cost of compliance.
Lack of consequences for violations: If there are no or weak consequences for violations, employees may perceive that there are no real repercussions for non-compliance. This can create a sense of impunity and encourage further violations.
Task 9: Role of health and safety legislation- (10 Marks Complete)
What is the role of health and safety legislation in the workplace?
The health and safety legislation ensures that every worker in the organization receives the minimum safety standard at the workplace. This happens when employer are required to develop risk profile outlining their operation risks.
The health and safety legislation also acts as a protector and promoter of the interests and welfare of employees in case of an accident and injuries.
The health and safety legislation provides guidelines for both the employees and employers about the Do's and Don'ts at the workplace to prevent workplace injuries.
The health and safety legislation informs the employees about their duties and rights and for employers, about their duties and accountabilities to maintain the workplace safe and secure for all the ones present there.
The health and safety legislation also provides the framework to resolve the disputes between employees and employers related to workplace accidents
The health and safety legislation ensures that every worker in the organization receives the minimum safety standard at the workplace, training employees on changes in operations or procedures.
The health and safety legislation also acts as a protector and promoter of the interests and welfare of employees in case of an accident and injuries.
The health and safety legislation provides guidelines for both the employees and employers about the Do's and Don'ts at the workplace to prevent workplace injuries.
The health and safety legislation lays down the expectations, parameters, standards and reporting methods for both employer and the employee.
The health and safety legislation informs the employees about their duties and rights and for employers, about their duties and accountabilities to maintain the workplace safe and secure for all the ones present there.
The health and safety legislation also provides the framework to resolve the disputes between employees and employers related to workplace accidents to ensure there Harmon between the parties.
To establish general health and safety obligations and concepts for the workplace that are entirely legal and also provide specific health and safety requirements that are legal.
To provide directions on how to adhere to regulations and technical details, including suggestions to assist employers in adhering to health and safety laws.
To frame strategies that direct everyone who has a responsibility for providing higher levels of performance in health and safety, with the ultimate goal of preventing death, injury, and illness in the workplace. For example, what must be done and why in order to address the major health and safety concerns.
To deploy a variety of regulatory actions to better manage health and safety hazards. The main ones are: influencing and engaging with stakeholders; influencing employers; raising awareness of health and safety risks and encouraging behavior change; advocating for proportionate and sensible health and safety; inspecting, investigating, enforcing, and engaging with the workforce; and working with other regulators and other government agencies.
The injured worker suffered a fractured foot and a back injury when handling the timber posts. The worker decides to sue Bricks to Homes for the injuries received. - (8 Complete)
Assuming that a judge rules in favor of the worker, what damages is the injured worker likely to receive?
The different types of compensation or damages that can be paid to the injured employee are as below=
Compensation for physical injuries and Medicare= When an employee is injured during the performance of work at the workplace, the court can provide him or her the damages in the form of compensation for physical injuries and treatment expenses.
Unemployment and loss of income = If the injury result in loss of income, then the court can order the employee to pay for the loss of income for the days when employee was not able to work due to his or her injuries. If the injuries results in permanent disability, the court can direct the employee to compensate the employee for unemployment
Pain and suffering damages= As per law, the employee is also entitled to receive the damages for the pain and sufferings resulting from the workplace injuries. Where emotional trauma and abnormality is involved, the court can also provide damages on the basis of psychological injuries.
Ongoing care= If the employee has to undergo ongoing care for an extended time or for his or her lifetime, then employer has to compensate for the sale.
Economic damages: These are damages that are meant to compensate the injured worker for their financial losses resulting from their injuries. They can include:
Medical expenses: The injured worker may be entitled to compensation for the cost of medical treatment related to their injuries, including hospitalization, surgery, medication, and physical therapy.
Loss of earning capacity: If the injured worker's injuries prevent them from returning to work or from performing certain job duties, they may be entitled to compensation for their future lost earnings.
Property damage: If the worker's personal property was damaged as a result of the accident, they may be entitled to compensation for repairs or replacement.
Emotional distress: If the injuries caused the worker emotional distress, such as anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), they may be entitled to compensation for these damages.
Instructions
Do not use AI app to paraphrase, it will be detected.
The idea of the answers must be the same, however, written in other word structure.
Do not reduce the length of the sentences, add on if possible.
DO not change the sequence of the answers.
