This assessment enables you to recognize the values of design thinking and teamwork, critically reflect on what design thinking means and on the res
Sprint Reflection (20%)
This assessment enables you to recognize the values of design thinking and teamwork, critically reflect on what design thinking means and on the results that it generated. Reflective thinking focuses on the process of making judgment and viewpoints about what has happened. There are various models of reflection.
A good reflection will include in-depth detail description of the activities, processes, and moments where viewpoints and insights are devised. A good reflection will also describe implications and insights to future professional learning and development.
Tasks:
-Review your notes and sketches from the design sprint
-Reflect upon the processes, activities, and memorable moments in the sprints.
-Write a summary of the reflections using the given template
Submission:
Each student is to submit a single MS word / PDF document to LearnJCU.
The reflective report should be written according to the reflection template
Sprint Reflection Report Template
Reflection on design thinking processes
What happened that most surprise you?
What was the most fulfilling part of it and the least fulfilling part of it?
What does that suggest about the values of each design thinking process?
What might you do differently as a result of the design thinking experience in sprint?
Reflection on prototype
What do you think and feel of the overall design of the final prototype?
What do you think and feel of the materials used for the prototype?
What are the views of other people on your design?
What do your learn from the prototypes designed by other teams?
What might you do differently as a result of the prototyping experience?
Reflection on teamwork
What happened that most surprise you?
What was the most fulfilling part of it and the least fulfilling part of it?
What does that suggest about the values of teamwork?
What does the experience in sprint suggest to your about your strengths in teamwork?
What does the experience in the sprint suggest to you about your weakness in teamwork?
What might you do differently as a result of the teamwork experience in sprint?
Images and sketch produced during the retrospective meetingSprint Reflection Rubric
Criteria Exemplary Satisfactory Poor
Reflection on Design Thinking process
40% Report demonstrates an in-depth reflection on the DT processes. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.
How did the process align with the ideas in this video from week1Designers Think BigViewpoints and interpretations are somewhat well supported but lack in-depth insight. Some examples are provided, as applicable. Reading from week 1 has not been discussed. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported.
Reflection on Prototyping
20% Report demonstrates an in-depth reflection on the final clickable prototype. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported.
How did you prototype align with ideas in this video from week 5
Design Thinking AirBnBReport demonstrates some reflection on the final clickable prototype. Examples provided could be clearer. Reading from week 5 has not been discussed. Report demonstrates a lack of reflection on the final clickable prototype.
Reflection on Teamwork
20% Report demonstrates an in-depth reflection on teamwork experience in sprint. Report elaborates upon self-learning, personal responsibility, and growth of skills and roles.
How did your team strategy align with ideas in this video from week 3Understanding Team ConflictViewpoints and interpretations are a bit superficial and not as well supported. Some examples are provided, as applicable. Reading from week 3 has not been discussed. Self-learning and personal responsibility are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported.
Writing
20% Uses appropriate language that conveys meaning to readers with clarity and no errors Uses appropriate language that conveys meaning to readers with clarity and minimal errors. Language used is not clear and/or does not convey meaning to readers. It contains frequent grammatical errors.
