A Comparative Analysis of the Resource-Based View and Michael Porter's Value Chain Model of the Firm

A Comparative Analysis of the Resource-Based View and Michael Porter's Value Chain Model of the Firm

Submitted by:

Students Name: Harpreet Kaur, Simranjeet Singh, Harpreet Devi, Rajvir KaurStudents ID: 100000610,100000710,100000752,100000662

Date Submitted: 31/7/2023

Interactive Learning Skills and Communication

Abstract

The firm's resource-based perspective has achieved achievement of strategy implementation. A company's actions are linked to a value chain for the interest of its consumers. This research describes in detail the Resource-Based View of the Firm and Michael Porter's Value-Chain Model of the Firm, with comparisons where relevant. It also investigates the distinctions across Michael's value chain model and the resource-based view on the organization.

Contents

Introduction 1

Literature review 1-5

Methodology 5

Findings 5-7

Advantages

Disadvantages

Conclusion 8

References 9-10

Introduction

Understanding the sources of competitive advantage has become crucial for businesses seeking long-term success in the dynamic and fiercely competitive commercial environment. The Resource-Based View (RBV) and Michael Porter's Value Chain Model are two well-known theoretical frameworks that have influenced strategic management practices and offered helpful insights into building a sustained competitive edge. This study examines the key ideas, key distinctions, and practical ramifications of these two significant models for contemporary firms.

The Resource-Based View (RBV) is based on the idea that a company's internal resources and skills form the basis of its competitive advantage. It asserts that businesses with distinctive, priceless, and difficult-to-replicate resources are better positioned to surpass their competitors. This viewpoint encourages managers to take a close look at themselves, recognizing and fostering the special assets that set their companies different from rivals. Effectively utilizing these resources enables businesses to take hold of durable market positions and operate better.

Michael Porter's Value Chain Model, in contrast, has a wider perspective and examines the complete value generation process within a corporation. The major and supporting operations of a company are separated out in this model to show how they all work together to provide value to consumers. Businesses can achieve a competitive advantage by pursuing either cost leadership or differentiation strategies by evaluating these operations to find possibilities for cost reduction and value creation.

By comparing RBV with Porter's Value Chain Model, we may gather important knowledge about each model's particular advantages and uses, assisting managers in making wise choices that will lead their companies to long-term success in the dynamic business world.

Literature review

Resource-Based View (RBV) of the Firm:

The Resource-Based View (RBV) of the company is a strategic management paradigm that highlights the relevance of an organization's internal resources and skills as the key factors in competitive advantage and superior performance (Barney, 2021). By emphasizing internal firm-specific traits rather than external market pressures, it arose as a response to the shortcomings of conventional industry-based techniques like Porter's Five pressures.

RB V's core ideas:

Resources: In the RBV, resources are the material and immaterial assets that a company has. Machines, equipment, and financial capital are examples of tangible resources. Knowledge, corporate culture, brand reputation, and intellectual property are examples of intangible resources.

Capabilities: A firm's capacity to efficiently allocate resources to carry out a range of tasks and operations. These could be connected to marketing, distribution, technology, innovation, customer service, etc.

Resource Heterogeneity: RBV emphasizes that enterprises vary in the types and combinations of resources they have available to them. By utilizing their individual resources to react differently to market opportunities and challenges, enterprises may take advantage of this heterogeneity to gain distinct competitive advantages.

Resource Immutability: According to RBV, some resources are challenging for rivals to duplicate or copy because of things like route dependency, causal ambiguity, or social complexity. These "sticky" assets support a firm's ongoing competitive edge.

Resource Complementarity: RBV emphasizes that a firm's resources and competencies should be integrated and complement one another to provide synergistic results. A competitive advantage greater than the sum of individual resources may result from the combination of resources.

Competitive Advantage via RBV:

RBV contends that enterprises get a competitive edge by having the following resources and skills that satisfy the VRIO criteria:

Value: Resources must give a company the ability to seize market opportunities, cut expenses, or outperform the competition in terms of value for consumers.

Rarity: Resources need to be scarce or difficult for rivals to get. A company might hold a distinct position in the market thanks to rare resources.

Inimitable Resources: Businesses need to have assets that are challenging for competitors to copy or replicate. Competitors are unable to offset the advantage due to this barrier.

Organization: In order to best utilize resources and skills, businesses need to have strong organizational structures and procedures in place.

RB V's practical repercussions

Resource Identification: Managers should undertake a thorough internal investigation to pinpoint the company's special and priceless resources, understanding their potential to help the company gain a competitive edge.

Resource Development: Through research, training, and strategic alliances, businesses may invest in developing and expanding their resources and capabilities.

Managers should carefully allocate resources to take advantage of market opportunities and create a competitive edge. Success depends on wise resource management.

RBV recognizes that resources and capacities might change over time. Managers must continuously evaluate and alter their resource base to respond to shifting market circumstances and technological breakthroughs.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage: According to RBV, sustained competitive advantage results from a constant emphasis on developing, nurturing, and utilizing distinctive resources and competencies that are in line with the firm's strategic goals.

Michael Porter's Value Chain Model of the Firm:

The Value Chain Model of the Firm, developed by Michael Porter, is a tactical tool that aids organizations in examining their internal operations and procedures in order to comprehend how value is produced for clients (Stephen,2022). The model identifies areas where a competitive advantage may be attained through cost reduction or differentiation by decomposing a firm's operations into particular activities.

Porter's Value Chain Model's Essential Elements

Porter lists the following five major actions as being directly engaged in the development and provision of a good or service:

a. Inbound logistics: This operation entails the receipt, storage, and distribution of raw materials and industrial inputs.

b. Operations: The manufacturing steps or operations when raw materials are changed into final goods.

c. Outbound logistics, on the other hand, refers to the process of storing and delivering finished goods to consumers or merchants.

d. Marketing and sales activities include those that are involved in promoting, advertising, and selling goods or services.

Service activities include after-sales assistance and client care.

Porter also cites four support activities that help the primary activities run well in addition to the primary activities themselves:

a. Procurement is the process of finding and acquiring the materials and labor required for production.

b. Technology development, sometimes known as R&D, is the process of creating new goods and processes.

c. Human resource management: overseeing the hiring, development, and training of staff to increase their productivity and capabilities.

d. The company's infrastructure comprises general management, finance, planning, and other support roles essential to the smooth operation of the main operations.

Value Chain Analysis for Competitive Advantage

Porter contends that by maximizing value chain operations, organizations may gain a competitive edge. There are two methods to do this:

Cost leadership: By simplifying value chain processes to save costs at each level, businesses may acquire a competitive edge. This enables them to provide goods or services at reduced costs, luring clients that care about pricing.

Differentiation: By improving particular value chain activities, businesses may differentiate their offerings and produce distinctive and superior goods and services. With this strategy, they may command high pricing and draw clients who appreciate distinctive traits or qualities.

Porter's Value Chain Model's Practical Implications

Process Improvement: Value chain analysis assists managers in locating inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the manufacturing and distribution process, allowing them to implement such changes.

Cost optimization: Companies are able to uncover chances to cut costs without sacrificing quality by carefully examining each value chain operation.

Innovation: Being aware of the technological development process can spur creativity, resulting in the creation of new products or improvements to existing ones.

Customer Focus: Value chain analysis helps businesses to concentrate on the requirements and preferences of their clients, which results in enhanced client happiness and service.

Methodology

The articles from the Internet were used for this investigation. The veracity of any source should be considered with caution, as with anything you find online unless the website is reputable from a scientific standpoint. Since they are British publications, the BBC, The Guardian, Yahoo UK, The Telegraph, and websites like The Independent are often regarded as trustworthy sources. As a result, these websites provide the majority of the information in this report. Forums and her website, where anyone can post articles for free, are additional resources. Articles from these websites are cited but left out of the report since it's possible that the authors are not dependable sources.

Findings

Comparison of RBV and Porter's Value Chain Model:

Michael Porter's Value Chain Model and The Resource-Based View (RBV) are two significant strategic management frameworks that provide different viewpoints on obtaining competitive advantage and superior performance. The aim, breadth, and method of each model's approach to strategic decision-making are different, even though both models provide insightful information on how a business fits into the market. The Porter's Value Chain Model and RBV are contrasted below:

Focus:

RBV: The main areas of internal resources and capacities are the focus of RBV. It highlights the fact that a firm's distinctive and priceless resources are what give it a competitive advantage. RBV advises businesses to make use of their unique resources to forge long-term competitive advantages in the marketplace.

The complete value-generating process within a corporation is the major emphasis of Porter's value chain model. It examines both internal and external operations, as well as how they all work together to provide value to consumers. At each level of the value chain, the model seeks to pinpoint areas for cost-cutting and value-adding potential.

Scope:

RBV: RBV offers a long-term viewpoint on competitive advantage. It focuses on the historical growth and resource accretion through time that creates enduring competitive advantage.

Porter's Value Chain Model offers a more operational and short- to medium-term view. It focuses on particular tasks and processes that might be improved to get a competitive edge in the current market environment.

Perspective:

RBV: RBV is more inward-looking, focusing on the internal characteristics of the company. It places a strong emphasis on developing and utilizing special resources to provide businesses with a competitive edge, regardless of external market circumstances.

Porter's Value Chain Model: Porter's model adopts a broader perspective and takes both internal and external elements that affect the value generation process into account. It acknowledges that the external environment and industry structure have a significant role in determining a firm's competitive position.

Temporal Dimension:

RBV's temporal component is both cumulative and historical in nature. It emphasizes how resources have grown and changed through time, adding to the firm's current competitive edge.

Porter's Value Chain approach: Porter's approach places an emphasis on the optimization of present operational operations. It evaluates the company's efficacy and efficiency in providing value to consumers at a specific moment.

Competitive edge Source:

RBV: According to RBV, having distinct and hard-to-replicate resources and capabilities gives an organization a competitive edge. Internal strengths are given priority as the main source of long-term benefits.

Porter's Value Chain Model: Porter's model contends that either cost leadership or differentiation in certain operations may be used to gain a competitive advantage. It views the effectiveness of the value chain as a whole as the source of competitive advantage.

Relevant Applications:

RBV: Managers may use RBV to pinpoint, enhance, and capitalize on their company's distinctive assets and skills. Managers may create plans that take advantage of their competitive advantages by performing internal audits and assessing the potential of their resources.

Managers may utilize Porter's model to optimize certain value chain operations, cutting costs or increasing distinctiveness. Managers may acquire a competitive edge by measuring the impact of each activity on value generation overall.

Porter's Value Chain Model:

The Value Chain Model may be used by managers to find potential for value addition and cost savings within certain operations.

Concentrate on improving the key processes that affect the overall cost leadership or differentiation strategy.

To achieve excellent performance, various value chain operations must cooperate and coordinate with one another.

Conclusion:

In order to comprehend a firm's competitive edge, it is helpful to consider both the Resource-Based View and Michael Porter's Value Chain Model. RBV has a strong emphasis on internal assets and capacities, while Porter's Value Chain Model offers a framework for examining value generation in particular activities. Applying both viewpoints may help managers create winning plans for long-term success and gain a thorough grasp of their company's competitive situation. Managers can make wise judgments and adjust their plans to the changing business environment by being aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

References

Beamish, P. W., & Chakravarty, D. (2021). Using the resource-based view in multinational enterprise research. Journal of Management, 47(7),pp.1861-1877.

Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-based theory and the value creation framework. Journal of Management, 47(7),pp.1936-1955.

Barney, J. B. (2021). The emergence of resource-based theory: a personal journey. Journal of Management, 47(7),pp.1663-1676

Chirchir, M. K., Stephen, O. O., & John, O. O. (2022). Supply Chain Integration and Firm Performance: The Mediating Effect of Competitive Advantage Among Large Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. African Journal of Business and Management (AJBUMA), 7(2), 45-67

Davis, G. F., & DeWitt, T. (2021). Organization theory and the resource-based view of the firm: The great divide. Journal of Management, 47(7),pp.1684-1697

Fuzinatto, N. M., & SANTOS JUNIOR, S. . L. V. I. O. (2020). Urban farming as competitive resource in food services: An evaluation through the resource-based view theory. Turismo: Viso e Ao, 22, 02-23

Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2023). Integrating the dialectic perspectives of resource-based view and industrial organization theory for competitive advantagea review and research agenda. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(3), pp.656-679.Ponte, R. C. D. V., Viana, F. L. E., & Silva, M. E. (2023). Diving into the business strategy: The strategy tripod's influence on supply chain sustainability orientation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), pp. 2155-2174.

Whitfield, K. (2019). 22. The Resource-Based View approach and HRM. Elgar introduction to theories of human resources and employment relations, 324.

Yousaf, U., & Pakistan, P. L. (2019). Knowledge Management in the light of Resource-Based View, Resource Dependence View, and Population Ecology View. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res, 48, pp. 58-77.

Zhang, Y., Hou, Z., Yang, F., Yang, M. M., & Wang, Z. (2021). Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 137, pp.500-516.Zaridis, A., Vlachos, I., &Bourlakis, M. (2021). SMEs strategy and scale constraints impact on agri-food supply chain collaboration and firm performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(14), pp.1165-1178..

.