ACCT2002 Cost Analysis for Decision Making
ACCT2002 Cost Analysis for Decision Making
Marking Rubric for Portfolio.
This rubric will be used to assess each of your portfolio questions two to four. Each question carries 10 marks.
Below Expectations(Fail)0-49 Meets Expectations(Pass)50-59 Meets Expectations(Credit)60-69 Exceeds Expectations (Distinction)70-79 Exceeds Expectations(High Distinction)80-100 Marks Awarded
Question Major errors.
Failed to address majority of the question.
Did not attempt the question. Some mistakes.
Incomplete answers.
More than half incorrect. A couple of mistakes.
Failed to answer all questions.
More than half the requirements answered correctly. Only one error or partial error.
Potentially all correct but for transcription error. Answered all parts correctly.
No errors. Total marks: /10
ACCT2002 Cost Analysis for Decision Making
Marking Rubric for Question One
This rubric will be used to assess your portfolio question one.
Below Expectations(Fail)0-49 Meets Expectations(Pass)50-59 Meets Expectations(Credit)60-69 Exceeds Expectations (Distinction)70-79 Exceeds Expectations(High Distinction)80-100 Marks Awarded
Organization/ Formatting
(Weight: 20%) Data is poorly organized. Appropriate formatting such as appropriate labels & column/row widths & heights are not used. Some data is organized, using standard formatting tools. Some labels or other important formatting tools are missing. Data is mostly organized, using appropriate standard formatting tools, such as labels and bolding. Data organization is good, using appropriate standard formatting tools, such as labels and bolding. Data is very well organized by using appropriate advanced formatting, including shading, alignment tools, borders, special fonts, appropriate labels, appropriate column/row height & width.
Computations & Formulas
(Weight: 30%) No cell formulas or minimal cell formulas used.
Within cells, absolute numbers used instead of relative numbers. Some cell formulas have been used but many errors in the usage of cell formulas.
Incorrect cell formulas used.
Within cells, mainly absolute numbers with some relative numbers were used. Correct cell formulas used but minor errors detected.
Within cells, some absolute numbers were used when relative numbers should have been used. Applicable cell formulas have been used and are correctly applied.
Within cells, relative numbers used with a few absolute numbers used. All correct cell formulas used as required.
No absolute numbers used within cells.
Information/Content
(Weight: 50%) Failed to address any requirements OR addressed minimal requirements with many errors. Some of the requirements have been correctly addressed.
Many errors in addressing the requirements. Most of the requirements have been addressed correctly. All requirements have been addressed with a few minor errors. All requirements have been correctly addressed.
Total marks: /10
