Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Reasoning CNA772
- Subject Code :
CNA772
Once you have downloaded the case scenario, read it carefully. Take time to consider the questions provided below using your own experience,reflecting on content that is provided within the first module of the unit and by conducting your own research.
Provide a brief introduction, highlighting the scenario chosen and what you are going to address in the written paper (approx 50-100 words).
Provide a 550 word analysis and response to the scenario. You may want to use the questions below to guide you.
Consider you patient's history and provide a brief overview of how any comorbidities and medical history may impact on recovery.
You may want to include any medications that may need to be withheld/reviewed.
You have been provided with some vital signs and a brief clinical picture. Would you do any further assessment to gain a more thorough insight into what is occurring? You may want to include the mean arterial pressure (MAP) providing your working out and state whether you would be concerned about this parameter (remember to use references).
Describe why you think your selected patient is exhibiting the above clinical signs and symptoms? What is occurring on a physiological basis? Provide at least one main patient problem that needs to be addressed. (This is where the Module content may also help).
In addition to the assessment you have described, how would you respond in this situation. For instance how would you address the above patient problem(s)?
If your response includes seeking for assistance and making a MET call, what could you be doing whilst waiting for the team to arrive?
Provide at least 6 references to support your discussion
Step 3: Copilot/Artificial Intelligence Tool Activity (Click to view)
Once you have completed Step 2, you can commence on Part 2 of this assessment task.
This is where you will analyse how artificial intelligence responds to your given clinical scenario. It is important to understand that although these tools can be useful, they may present presumptions, generalisastions and use inaccurate or inapprorpriate resources to develop responses.
As part of Office 365 given by the University, you will have access to a Generative AI tool: Copilot.
Microsoft Copilot for the Web
Information is also within the following link AI Information page in the student portal.
You will need to reference your use of AI and present where and how you used it in your paper.
Your case scenario has a prompt that is provided for you to copy and paste into Copilot.
Go into Copilot and paste the prompt into the prompt box. (It may state "Ask me anything..." or "Message Copilot..")
Copilot will provide a response.
Step 4: Analysis of Copilot Response (Click to view)
Make a copy of this response and paste it into your essay. Place it at the end of the essay using an Appendix. For example, Appendix A: Copilot Response.
If Copilot has provided you with information without references, provide it with the following prompt;
'Provide some references for the above'.
Provide an analysis of the copilot response comparing it to your own response in Part 1. Consider the following in your answer.
Which suggestions aligned with your own thoughts?
Were there additional suggestions presented that are relevant and useful and that you had not considered? Did you learn anythging from the response provided?
Were there omissions in the response that you had included in your answer?
Did the AI tool calculate or mention the important of Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)?
Were there any suggestions provided by AI that are not necessarily approriate or relevant?
Did you agree with the priorities of care suggested by AI or would you conduct recommendations in a different order?
Were there assumptions made? Was the information appropriate to a senior nurse/advanced clnician such as yourself who is completing portgraduate studies? Was it more directed towards a nursing student or the public?
Are full references provided and can you locate these?
Are the references current, peer reviewed, primary sources (research publications)?
Are the references relevant to the topic with key points that you would be able to effectively use as citations within your paper?
Summarise your analysis in around 350 words
Step 5: Conclusion and References (Click to view)
Complete your essay with a brief conclusion of 50-100 words. This summarises what you have addressed in your essay.
Ensure that you have a reference list
CNA772 Assessment Task 2: Case Scenario Analysis and Copilot Activity Rubric.
|
Criteria |
Performance Indicators |
||||
|
High Distinction (HD) (80-100%) |
Distinction (DN) (70-79%) |
Credit (CR) (60-69%) |
Pass (PP) (50-59%) |
Fail (NN) (0-49%) |
|
|
1.Interprets patient data related to underlying physiological processes supported by relevant evidence-informed research (25%) |
Demonstrates detailed knowledge and astute critical thinking. Thoroughly and astutely interprets patient data and historical information available. Presents interpretation in a compelling manner using well-articulated reference to underlying physiological processes. Supports interpretation with extensive, relevant evidence-informed research. |
Demonstrates extensive mostly accurate knowledge and critical thinking. Presents a sound interpretation of patient data and historical information available. Presents interpretation clearly with reference to underlying physiological processes. Supports interpretation with relevant evidence-informed research. |
Demonstrates a sufficient level of knowledge with some evidence of critical thinking. Presents mostly accurate interpretation of patient data and historical information available. Presents interpretation with basic reference to underlying physiological processes Supports interpretation with some relevant evidence-informed research. |
Demonstrates basic knowledge and critical thinking abilities. Presents rudimentary interpretation of patient data and historical information Presents interpretation with minimal, sometimes inaccurate reference to underlying physiological processes. Supports interpretation with minimal evidence-informed research. |
Demonstrates limited or no insight and critical thinking. Fails to accurately interpret patient data and historical information Fails to demonstrate understanding of underlying physiological processes. Lacks relevant evidence-informed research. |
|
2.Rationalises main patient problems with clear reference to pathophysiological processes (25%)
|
Demonstrates exceptional understanding of patient problems. Provides an astute, persuasive rationale for main patient problems with well-articulated, thoughtful reference to pathophysiological processes. |
Demonstrates a sound understanding of patient problems. Provides a convincing rationale for main patient problems with reference to pathophysiological processes. |
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of patient problems Provides a rationale for main patient problems with some reference to underlying pathophysiology |
Demonstrates elementary insight into patient problems. Provides minimal reference to pathophysiological processes Links lack clarity |
Demonstrates limited or no understanding of patient problems Lacks any reference to pathophysiological processes. |
|
3.Presents recommendations for practice relevant to the case scenario supported by evidence-informed research (40%) |
Presents highly relevant, prioritised and practical recommendations in Part A of assignment Discussion is supported with integration of current research. Demonstrates exceptional analytical skills and extensive understanding of scenario by drawing concise, well researched comparison and analysis of generative AI response. |
Presents well-considered and relevant recommendations in Part A of assignment, Discussion is supported by broad reading and reference to current research Demonstrates sound analytical skills and a clear understanding of scenario by drawing a meaningful comparison and analysis of generative AI response. |
Presents practical recommendations that are appropriate to the case in Part A of assignment. Discussion is supported by evidence-informed research. Demonstrates good analytical skills and understanding of scenario adequate analytical skills by drawing comparison and analysis of generative AI response |
Presents recommendations at a beginning level in Part A of assignment. Discussion is supported with minimal attempt to integrate current scholarly resources. Demonstrates few analytical skills and minimal understanding of scenario by making little attempt to draw comparison and analysis of generative AI response |
Fails to present relevant or practical recommendations. Demonstrates limited or no application of knowledge. Fails to compare and analyse generative AI response with reference to own assertions. |
|
4.Communicates clearly and succinctly using the current APA Style. Utilizes correct English conventions (spelling, grammar, and punctuation)
(10%)
|
Maintains all the academic standards by writing clearly and succinctly in accordance with the Presentation of Assignments Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with no errors as per the current APA 7 referencing guide. Paper is skilfully constructed and is a pleasure to read |
Mostly maintains an academic standard in accordance with the Presentation of Assignments Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with minimal errors as per the APA referencing guide. Paper is well constructed and a pleasure to read. |
Needs some improvement in Academic standards in accordance with the Presentation of Assignments Referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to as per APA referencing guide but there are a number of errors. Paper is relatively well constructed although there are sections which could be improved. |
Presents mostly in accordance with the Presentation of Assignments Referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to as per APA referencing guide but there are many errors. There are sections in the paper which could improve to assist flow and syntax. |
Submits work that is not in accordance with the Presentation of Assignments Referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions have not been adhered to as per APA referencing guide. The paper is disjointed and difficult to read. |
