This is generic criteria, however, particular assessments will have additional/alternative criteria/requirements which will supersede the criteria s

Year 2

This is generic criteria, however, particular assessments will have additional/alternative criteria/requirements which will supersede the criteria stated here.

First Upper second Lower second Third Fail

Knowledge Accurate factual content for taught material; significant additional material presented

Accurate factual content of most of taught material presented; some additional material presented in coursework Accurate factual content of most of taught material presented Adequate recall of most of taught material presented Lack of basic knowledge necessary for an understanding of the topic

Comprehension Clear understanding of all subject / topic / concept / theory material. Clear development of own ideas Very Good understanding of most of subject / topic / concept / theory. Some development of ideas Good understanding of a fair range of subject / topic / concept / theory. Some limitations apparent Adequate understanding of some of subject / topic / concept / theory Limited evidence of understanding of subject / topic / concept / theory

Application Successful application of theory / knowledge to new situations. Demonstrable competence in practical work General application of theory / knowledge.

Demonstrable competence in practical work Limited application of theory / knowledge.

Demonstrable competence in practical work Adequate application of theory/knowledge

Demonstrable competence in practical work Insufficient application of theory/knowledge evident

Competence in practical work was not demonstrated

Analysis Excellent analysis of evidence or results, with clear, independently derived conclusions Very good analysis, clear and orderly, with logical conclusions Good analysis, clear and orderly, with some logical conclusions Adequate analysis with limited conclusions Descriptive, with many inaccuracies.

Evaluation

Evidence for independent thinking and / or logical argument, with value judgment and considerable evaluation judgment and considerable evaluation Evidence for independent thinking and / or logical argument, with some value judgment Some independent thinking; personal view indicated in broad terms. Limited evaluation Limited view rather than independent position presented No independent evaluation. Paraphrasing of others statements

First Upper second Lower second Third Fail

Presentation

(in written communication) Excellent: no errors of spelling. Appropriate choice of words. Good sentence / paragraph construction; very clearly presented. Correct scientific conventions used, excellent bibliography Very good: one or two errors of spelling. Good structure / construction, neatly presented. Readable style. Acceptable bibliography Good: some errors in spelling and/or sentence construction. Correct structure, limited bibliography Acceptable: quite a few errors in spelling and /or sentence construction. Correct structure, limited bibliography Poor spelling and/or sentence construction. Poor structure; untidy presentation. Inappropriate bibliography

Oral communication

(formal presentation Voice clear, well-paced. Outline and content of presentation very clear. Narrative well structured. Visual aids well produced Voice and delivery good. Content of presentation well set-out. Narrative generally well structured. Good use of visual aids Voice and delivery good. Narrative lacking some structure. Visual aids generally acceptable Voice and delivery acceptable. Poor choice of structure for the narrative. Adequate use of visual aids. Voice unclear. Narrative unstructured Visual aids poor

Numeracy Competent in all those areas relevant to the topic Competent in the majority of the areas relevant to the topic Competent in most of the areas relevant to the topic Competent in some of the areas relevant to the topic Not competent in most or all areas relevant to the topic

[SCHOOL NAME]

Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences Coursework Cover Sheet

Assignment 2 Lab Report

Students should add this coversheet, to the start of their assessment before submission through Turnitin.

Seminar Tutor (If appropriate):

Module Title: XXX Programme Title: XXX

Module Code: XXX Year of Study: XXX

Academic Misconduct / Plagiarism Declaration

By attaching this front cover sheet to my assessment I confirm and declare that I am the sole author of this work, except where otherwise acknowledged by appropriate referencing and citation, and that I have taken all reasonable skill and care to ensure that no other person has been able, or allowed, to copy this work in either paper or electronic form, and that prior to submission I have read, understood and followed the University regulations as outlined in the Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for Academic Misconduct available at the following link: https://www.uclan.ac.uk/study_here/assets/assessment_handbook_2122.pdfHave you checked the following in order to maximise the grade you can achieve for this assignment? Please mark X to confirm

Learning Outcomes have been addressed (See End of Coversheet for LOs) Similarity check via Turn-it-in Referencing accuracy according to provided guide Grammar Spelling Word count (or other length limitation as described in the brief) WELLBEING

We wish to support any student who is experiencing mitigating circumstances which prevents students from performing to the best of their ability when completing or submitting assignments. If you are experiencing such circumstances then you may apply for mitigating circumstances. Wherever possible this must be done prior to handing your assignment.

I believe that I do / I do not need to apply for mitigating circumstances for this assignment at this moment in time

Please delete as appropriate

(You may still apply for mitigating circumstances if you subsequently feel that your performance has been adversely affected by issues that you may currently be unaware of).

SELF REFLECTION This section suggested for inclusion if appropriate to the assessment otherwise can be deleted

Assessment Criteria:

Details of this can be found in the assignment brief. In order to ensure the assessment process is fair, we want to make sure that the assessment criteria are clear to you in advance. Self-Evaluation:

Simply rate how you think this assessment will perform against the assessment criteria; i.e. 1st (very good/excellent), 2:1 (good), 2:2 (competent), 3rd (basic), fail (weak).

This helps us provide detailed comments on your work and clarify things you do not understand

E.g. Understanding, including knowledge

E.g. Applying, including analysis and evaluation

E.g. Researching, including range of sources, referencing and citation

E.g. Communicating, including structure, clarity of argument and use of English