Assessment 1: Online oral presentation instructions and submission link

Download Solution Now

MMH5AMM: Advanced Mental Health Practice

Assessment 1: Online oral presentation

Assignment type Online presentation

Weighting 30%

Word count / length Equivalent 1500 words; 10 minutes

(+/-10%; the reference list is not included in the word count but in-text citations are)

SILOs 1, 3, 5

Due date Wednesday of Week 4, 23.59 (Melbourne time*)

*For current Melbourne time, please check information under the Assessment tile in the LMS of this subject.

Topic overview

For this assessment, you will need to develop and present a brochure on a community mental health role. For the purposes of this assessment, a brochure is a simple handout that you would use in a presentation. Examples of roles to focus on could include the following:

CATT clinician

ECATT clinician

forensic liaison

police liaison

community liaison

homeless team worker

community rehabilitation

drug and alcohol liaison.

Look at some of the topic material that is covered in this subject to assist you with identifying a role. This is a very good opportunity for you to look at promotional roles within your health service and go and speak to people who work in these roles. Conduct a search using SCOPUS or Cinahl for appropriate literature to support your presentation. If possible, go and speak to someone who is in the role at your workplace. The literature should give you information about the history of the role and why it developed. In your presentation, provide reflection about the qualifications and experience needed to go into such a community role. You will then need to record a 10-minute presentation of your brochure.

The assessment task requires you submit a 10-minute video which includes the usual +/- 10% in the assessment task length giving you a 9-11 minute window for the length of your video. It is particularlyimportant to notethat the markerswill not watch past the 11:00 minute markso your entire presentation (including your reference list) needs to be included before you get to this point:anything after this will not be included in the marking of your presentation.

Assessment criteria

This assessment will measure your ability to:

Introduce your topic on your brochure and brochure presentation (3 marks)

Identifyonecommunity role and the scope of the role within mental health services (6 marks)

Provide the background to this role (how did the role come to be). What population does the role work with? What are the key responsibilities in health care? What are the educational/experience requirements to work in this role? (12 marks)

Conclude with the key points found (3 marks)

Present and deliver the brochure in an engaging and professional manner (3 marks)

Use appropriate referencing and literature to support your statements and have a list of references on your brochure (3 marks)

Guidelines

You will have two products for assessment submission (along with your cover sheet as usual):

a brochure

a video of you presenting your brochure.

Presentation format

The following provides a suggested structure for your PowerPoint presentation structure:

A title slide: this should include your presentation title, name and student number and should be showing at the very beginning of the video.

Introduction (1 slide).

Identification of one community role and the scope of the role within mental health services (2-3 slides).

Provision of the background to this role including how the role came to be (1-2 slides).

What population does the role work with? (1-2 slides)

What are the key responsibilities of clinicians practising in this area of mental health care? (1-2 slides)

What are the educational/experience requirements to work in this role? (1-2 slides)

Conclusion (1 slide).

Reference list in APA7 format (2-3 slides): note: please make sure that you (1) spend at least 5 seconds showing each slide in the video to give the markers adequate time to review your reference list, and (2) include this within the 11-minute maximum time period.

Please remember this needs to be prepared and presented to an academic standard befitting the expectations of our profession. This means you must include (1) in-text citations on the slides wherever you are using the work of another (just as you would when writing an assignment), and (2) a full reference list in APA7 format that includes of the sources you cited during the actual presentation.

NB: You do not need to read out aloud the full details of each of your citations when delivering your presentation; having them visible in the text on the slide will suffice.

Creating the brochure

There are many different programs that can assist you to do this though both Word and PowerPoint have template options to help you create a brochure. When you select aNew document/presentationsearch forbrochurein theformat sectionand you will find multiple options in both programs.

Creating your recording

You will need to record your presentation, either using a mobile device, or an online meeting platform such as Zoom (we recommend Zoom). The video file is to then be uploaded to the assessment portal (see instructions below). Zoom saves files as an mp4. Files saved in other formats will not be able to be saved to the LMS or viewed.

We need to be able to see you, your brochure (in Word, PowerPoint or whatever other format you have used) and hear you clearly. Zoom also does this very well. So please review your video to make sure it is of good quality and can be seen and heard clearly.

Submit your video using the Echo360 mashup tool via the LMS using your assessments submission link (see instructions below).

Submission format

You are required to submit three separate components for this assessment task as follows:

A brochure (saved in PDF format).

A video of you presenting your PowerPoint presentation (in MP4 format).

Your cover sheet (using the template provided for Assessment 1 on the Assessment page).

For this assessment task you will need to submit each of these three components (use the submission button at the bottom of this page):

Your PowerPoint presentation submitted to Turnitin (we encourage you to do this in PDF format).

Your cover sheet submitted to Turnitin (we encourage you to do this in PDF format).

Your MP4 recording of you presenting your presentation submitted using the Echo360 mashup tool (see instructions below).

As this is an oral presentation assessment,you will be graded entirely on the MP4 recording of you presenting your topic; submitting the written PowerPoint version of your presentation through Turnitin ensures the academic integrity of the task is maintained to the highest standard but it is not otherwise included in the marking process.

Record your presentation using a mobile device, online meeting software or other (see instructions above). Below are some possible software programs you can use to record your presentation and relevant how to articles for each application. You are required to submit your video using the Echo360 mashup tool via the LMS using your assessments submission link located on your Assessments page. See the article and video below for user guides to assist you with the submission of your assessment.

Assessment criteria / grading rubric

CRITERIA A: Excellent

(>80%) B: Very good

(7079%) C: Good

(6069%) D: Acceptable

(5059%) N: Unacceptable

(<50%)

Introduction

(3 marks) Provides a clear and succinct introduction of themself along with a highly detailed overview of the scope and aims of the presentation.

(3 marks) Provides a clear introduction of themself along with a detailed overview of the

scope and aims of the presentation.

(2.5 marks) Provides a fairly clear introduction of themself along with a reasonably detailed overview of the scope and aims of the presentation.

(2 marks) Provides a very basic introduction of themself along with a limited and vague overview of the scope and aims of the presentation.

(1.5 marks) Does not provide even a basic introduction of themself nor an adequate overview of the scope and aims of the presentation.

(<1.5)

Section missing / incomplete.

(0 marks)

Identifies one role and scope

(6 marks) Clearly identifies the community MH role chosen for the presentation.

Provides a highly accurate and detailed overview of the scope of practice associated with the role.

Comprehensive use of high-quality literature in this section, which adds to the quality of the discussion.

(56 marks) Broadly identifies the community MH role chosen for the presentation.

Provides an accurate and detailed overview of the scope of practice associated with the role.

Very good use of quality literature in this section, which adds to the quality of the discussion.

(4.5 marks) Provides a good introduction to the role chosen for the presentation.

Provides a reasonably accurate and detailed overview of the scope of practice associated with the role.

Sound use of reasonable quality literature in this section, which adds to the quality of the discussion.

(4 marks) Provides a very limited and broad introduction to the role chosen for the presentation.

Provides a basic overview of the scope of practice associated with the role though more detail required here.

Minimal / poor quality literature presented, providing limited support to the quality of the discussion.

(4 marks) Does not provide an introduction to the role chosen for the presentation to the required standard.

Overview of the scope of practice associated with the role inadequate or incomplete.

(<3 marks)

Section missing / incomplete.

(0 marks)

Identifies the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities in health care

(12 marks) Presents a succinct, relevant, and focused discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role.

Expresses ideas in a clear and concise manner with well executed support from high quality literature effectively integrated into the text.

(1012 marks) Presents a reasonably succinct and relevant discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role.

Expresses ideas in a clear manner with well executed support from good quality literature integrated into the text.

(8.59.5 marks) Presents a reasonably detailed discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role.

Expresses ideas in a sound manner with well executed support from good quality literature integrated into the text.

(7.58 marks) Presents an adequately detailed discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role.

Expresses ideas in a superficial and disjointed manner with limited support from basic quality literature.

(67 marks) Did not present a discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role to the minimum required standard. Substantially more depth and detail warranted here.

Expresses ideas in a superficial and disjointed manner with no meaningful support from quality literature.

(<6 marks)

Section missing / incomplete.

(0 marks)

Conclusion and key points

(3 marks) Delivers a clear and succinct conclusion that accurately summarises all of the key points covered in the presentation.

(3 marks) Delivers a clear conclusion that accurately summarises the key points covered in the presentation.

(2.5 marks) Delivers a reasonably clear and succinct conclusion that summarises most of the points covered in the presentation.

(2 marks) Delivers a very basic conclusion that provides a vague summary of some of the points covered in the presentation.

(1.5 marks) Does not provide even a basic conclusion or summary of the main points covered in the presentation.

Conclusion not clearly identified within the presentation.

(<1.5 marks)

Section missing / incomplete.

(0 marks)

Presentation

(3 marks) Delivery is polished and confident throughout the entirety of the presentation.

The presenters conduct is compelling and conveys an excellent knowledge of the brochure they are presenting.

(3 marks) Delivery is generally polished, but has minor issues with tone, posture, gestures, eye contact, or vocal expression occurring occasionally during the presentation.

The presenters conduct is engaging and conveys a strong knowledge of the brochure they are presenting.

(2.5 marks) Delivery is consistently lacking in one or two areas (tone, posture, gestures, eye contact, or vocal expression) during the presentation.

The presenters conduct is reasonably engaging and conveys a solid knowledge of the brochure they are presenting.

(2 marks) Delivery is lacking in three or more areas (tone, posture, gestures, eye contact, or vocal expression) through much of the presentation.

The presenters conduct is uncertain and conveys a limited knowledge of the brochure they are presenting.

(1.5 marks) Delivery is consistently lacking in all key communication areas (tone, posture, gestures, eye contact, or vocal expression) throughout the brochure presentation.

(<1.5 marks)

Section missing / incomplete.

(0 marks)

Writing and use of literature to support your work.

(3 marks) Excellent

Thebrochureis extremely well written and presented and with no issues with spelling and grammar, and as such has no significant issues requiring further revision.

The use of literature (in APA7 format) to support the written contentin the brochureis extremely well done (as evidenced through the consistently effective use of in-text citations integrated into the text to support the ideas being presented).

The reference list is presented in APA7 format without any significant format issues and reveals an excellent quality body of literature as having been used researching and preparing the brochure.

(3 marks) Minor revision needed

There are areas which are well done but one of the following was not evident or needed further development (1 issue = 1 mark; >1 issue = 0.5 marks):

Section headings must be used

Use of quality literature

Adherence to APA7 presentation style

Adherence to APA7 in-text citation requirements

Adherence to APA7 end text citation requirements.

(0-1 marks) Unacceptable

The brochure is written and presented to a very poor standard overall. As such it has significant issues that require major revision to reach the standard required for this assessment task.

Your use of literature (in APA7 format) to support your discussion has not reached the minimum acceptable standard overall (as evident in both your Reference List and very limited use of in-text citations).

(0 marks)

Submission status

Submission status No attempt

Grading status Not marked

Due date Wednesday, 23 August 2023, 11:59 PM

Time remaining 7 days 10 hours

Grading criteria Introduction

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).Provides a clear and succinct introduction of themself along with a highly detailed overview of the scope and aims of the presentation.

Maximum score

Identifies one role and scope

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).Clearly identifies the community MH role chosen for the presentation.Provides a highly accurate and detailed overview of the scope of practice associated with the role.Comprehensive use of high-quality literature in this section, which adds to the quality of the discussion.

Maximum score

Identifies the background, scope of role and key responsibilities in health care

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).Presents a succinct, relevant, and focused discussion regarding the background, experience requirements and key responsibilities associated with the role.Expresses ideas in a clear and concise manner with well executed support from high quality literature effectively integrated into the text.

Maximum score

Conclusion and key points

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).Delivers a clear and succinct conclusion that accurately summarises all of the key points covered in the presentation.

Maximum score

Presentation

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).Delivery is polished and confident throughout the entirety of the presentation.The presenters conduct is compelling and conveys an excellent knowledge of the brochure they are presenting.

Maximum score

Writing and use of Literature to support your work.

This description is reflective of an A: Excellent grade (>80%).The brochure is extremely well written and presented and with no issues with spelling and grammar, and as such has no significant issues requiring further revision.The use of literature (in APA7 format) to support the written content in the brochure is extremely well done (as evidenced through the consistently effective use of in-text citations integrated into the text to support the ideas being presented).The reference list is presented in APA7 format without any significant format issues and reveals an excellent quality body of literature as having been used researching and preparing the brochure.