Building And Testing Classifiers In WEKA Assessment

Task 2

Question 2

The ZeroR classifier has a 53.47?curacy rate. It represents the percentage of cases in the dataset that the ZeroR classifier properly categorised. This indicates that when comparing ZeroR's predictions to the instances' actual class labels, it correctly predicted 53.47% of the classes while incorrectly predicting 46.53% of the classes.

This accuracy serves as a standard against which more complex classifiers are evaluated. Any classifier you develop should, ideally, do better than this benchmark. If a more sophisticated classifier falls short of ZeroR's accuracy, there can be issues with the features you choose, how the data is prepared, or even the classifier itself. ZeroR's precision is frequently used as a starting point for assessing and understanding the effectiveness of more intricate classification algorithms.

Question 3

According to the decision tree Weka (Hall et al., 2009) learnt throughout the training set, "alcohol" is the most illuminating single attribute for the task at hand. This is so because several branches of the tree are affected by the fact that the tree separates the data early on based on the "alcohol" attribute.

Different divides and judgements can be used to deduce how "alcohol" affects the quality of wine:

Additional splits are formed for wines with an alcohol content of less than or equal to 10.5 depending on other numerical characteristics.

The classification of wines with an alcohol concentration over 10.5 tends to tilt more towards "good" grade wine.

This shows that a wine's alcohol concentration has a big influence on how it is classified.

The observation stated in Question 1 is supported by the decision tree that Weka learnt. Among the other factors, the distribution of the alcohol characteristic was the most unusual. The decision tree findings, which divided the nodes mostly based on the alcohol concentration value, confirm this claim.

Question 4

Following are the accuracy levels of Weka decision tree based on the two methods:

• Using the entire training set 91.62%
• Cross-Validation with 10 folds 73.92%

After applying supervised discretization to the "alcohol" and "sulphates" characteristics, the decision tree's accuracy rose from 91.6198% to 93.43%. The influence offeature engineering made possible by discretization is responsible for this increase in accuracy.

It is important to apply supervised discretization because, based on the connections between the variable and the target class, it may convert continuous variables into discrete categories or bins. This can help the algorithm catch relationships that are not linear that it would not have been able to do as rapidly with the original continuous values. By merging similar instances in these bins, the decision tree technique can reveal more clear divides and produce predictions that are more accurate.

Discretizing the attributes of "alcohol" and "sulphates" helped the decision tree technique better capture their impact on wine quality by dividing the cases into ranges that were more representative of the various classes. Because of this, the algorithm could be able to identify more important divisions in these characteristics, which would boost accuracy.

Question 5

The effectiveness of a machine learning model is assessed using the 10-fold cross validation approach. Basically, the entire dataset is divided into 10 smaller groups, or "folds." The model is trained on nine folds and tested on the remaining one ten times during training and evaluation. This process is repeated until each fold has only been used once as a test set. The results of these 10 assessments are then averaged to get a measure of the overall effectiveness of the model.

Overfitting is the main reason for the disparity in accuracy between the 10-cross validation on the training set and when the training set was used.

A model has previously "seen" this data during training if it is trained using the whole training set and then evaluated using the same set. Because it has efficiently memorised this information, it performs very well on it, leading to better accuracy. This does not guarantee that the model will apply effectively to new, untested data, either.

Cross-validationevaluates the model using multiple subgroups of the data, which helps to determine how effectively it generalises. Each fold acts as both a training set and a test set to avoid the model from becoming overly dependent on a single section of the data. This can paint a more accurate picture of the model's performance by demonstrating how effectively the model generalises to unobserved data.

Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back! Exam Question Bank is your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects.

Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.

To connect with expert and ask your query click here Exam Question Bank