Consultancy Project BUSS60001
- Subject Code :
BUSS60001
- University :
others Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
United Kingdom
Hand in location: |
CECOS |
? |
Turnitin via Moodle |
? |
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
Course: |
BA (Hon) Business Management & Sustainability
|
Module Title: |
Consultancy Project |
Module Code: |
BUSS60001 |
Assignment Title: |
Assessment 1: Project Proposal- word document Assessment 2: Poster Presentation Assessment 3: Project Report |
Weighting: |
Assessment 1: 20% Assessment 2: 20% Assessment 3: 60% |
Module Lecturer: |
Miss. Adiba Hurain |
Word Guideline: |
Assessment 1: 1,000 words Assessment 2: 1 page/1,000 words Assessment 3: 4,000 words |
Assignment Timetable: |
|
Date Set: |
15/01/2025 |
Submission Date and Time: |
Assessment 1: Project proposal Upload to Turnitin no later than Sunday 16th February 2025. Ethical Approval documentation- Thursday 13th February 2025. Assessment 2: Poster uploaded to Turnitin no later than Sunday 16th March 2025. Assessment 3: Report uploaded to Turnitin no later than Sunday 27th April 2025. |
Expected Return: |
within 20 working days |
Learning Outcomes (LO) to be Assessed: |
LO1. Critically evaluate the impact of the external environment on organisations.
Knowledge & Understanding. Enquiry
LO2. Analyse and apply selected investigative techniques to interpret complex business challenges and propose innovative and sustainable solutions.
Enquiry. Learning. Analysis. Application. Problem Solving. Communication
LO3. Plan, manage and implement a live consultancy project.
Application
LO4. Critically assess the practical implications for an organisation, stemming from your research
Analysis. Problem Solving
LO5. Reflect upon and evaluate your research, skills and personal development.
Analysis. Reflection
Assignment set by: |
Miss. Adiba Hurain (adiba.tutor@cecos.ac.uk ) |
Assignment verified by: |
Dr. Sajid Kazmi |
For all elements of this module, you will be required to work alongside an employer and act as a consultant to identify an area of research which is valuable to the organisation. It is suggested you choose an organisation from the list provided on the Moodle which is best suited to your current areas of interest and/or career aspirations. You will be involved in real-time problem solving, recommending actions to your client. |
Brief for 2025-26
Assessment 1: Project Proposal word document outlining organisational problem as well as possible and proposed solutions. (1,000 words) (20%) (LOs 1 & 2)
A proposal word document, consider exploring the following areas:
- Introduction of chosen Company (20%)
- Background /history of chosen company.
- Aim of issue to be investigated.
- Research project objectives.
- Critically evaluate the impact of the external environment on your chosen company.
- Influencing Literature (40%)
- Students present academic Literature that must demonstrate their understanding of the literature selected and explain the relevance to their research project.
- What theories/concepts are you going to be to applying to your organisation: what research, why the research, how much research and when are you going to be conducting this research
- Proposed Methodology (25%)
- This section should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the research process and differences between quantitative and qualitative research. [Research onion application]
- Gantt Chart/planning documentation.
- Chosen research methods secondary/primary research.
- Presentation of document (15%)
- Fully referenced and confirming to Harvard guide
- Professional, clear, and informative. Creativity in design method chosen.
- Ethical Approval
For you to be able to conduct this research and work alongside a client of your choice you must ensure you have the Universitys ethical approval. You will submit your ethical approval documentation to Turnitin.
*Please note, these are not the definitive areas, and you should include information that you feel is relevant to your project.
Assessment 2: Poster Presentation- outlining the entire research project. Poster will showcase the context, the problem/issue, the methodological approach, key findings, conclusions, and a reflection on your personal and professional development.
(one Page 1000 words) (20%) (LO5)
[PLEASE view template on Moodle for assistance with layout of poster]
Produce a poster to showcase the content of your project. Ensure the poster has the following: -
- Introduction to Company (10%)
- Background /history of the company.
- Aim and objectives.
- Methodology (15%)
- Secondary research to include relevant literature, theories, and concepts.
- Primary research if conducted.
- Analysis of the key findings (25%)
- Pictorial data with supporting evaluating analysis
- Conclusions and recommendations (25%)
- What are the recommendations you are making to your organisation?
- Conclude project referring to your aim.
- Reflection you must use a reflective model. (10%)
- Reflecting on the project, what changes would you make if you were to conduct the research again?
- Document presentation and referencing (15%)
- Confirms to the Harvard guide.
- Academic underpinning
- Showcases the results of the study well.
- Attractive and information document
Assessment 3. Project Report- Written report outlining the business issue/problem, the methodological approach taken, and the findings from the research process. This must also include conclusions and practical recommendations for the organisation based on the investigation undertaken (4,000 words) (60%) (LOs 3 & 4)
[PLEASE view template on Moodle for assistance with layout of Report]
Using the feedback and research conducted in assessment 1, now plan, manage, and implement your project plan. You are required to research and draw on wider sources of both academic and industry related sources and data to fulfil the module assessment requirements. Students must ensure they conduct a critical reasoned evaluation from research methods chosen and draw robust conclusions and make recommendations relating to the project topic aim. You must also reflect on the research skills and development you have made throughout this module. You may consider exploring the areas in the structure below:
Chapter 1. Introduction of Company [15%]
- Background/history of the company.
- Aim, Objectives, and research questions.
- Brief overview of the external environment of your company.
Chapter 2. Literature Review [15%]
- What is currently known about this topic.
- Use literature to inform your project objectives.
Chapter 3- Project Methodology [15%]
- Research Philosophy Research onion.
- Analysis of data -quantitative and qualitative.
- Proof of Ethical Approval (Must be attached in appendices)
Chapter 4- Project Findings [15%]
- Discussion of findings relevant to the aims and objectives set.
- Have any patterns been identified in the data collected?
Chapter 5- Conclusion and recommendations [20%]
- What are the main conclusions: - were the project objectives achieved success/limitations of the research.
- What are the recommendations: - do they have reference to appropriate underpinning theory and/or frameworks.Are the recommendations provided realistic and achievable for the client?Have you critically assessed the practical implications for your company?
Chapter 6- Reflection [10%] [include a reflective model.]
- Make comments on how the experience has impacted your skills set and employability prospects.If you were to complete this project again, what would you do differently?
7.0. list of references and 8.0. Appendices [10%]
- Gantt chart schedule including milestones.
- Communications with client
- Recommendations tools created.
Task Marks and Word Count 60% |
Weighting |
Word count-4,000 |
Chapter 1- Introduction |
15% |
600 words |
Chapter 2- Literature Review |
15% |
600 words |
Chapter 3- Project Methodology |
15% |
600 words |
Chapter 4- Project findings |
15% |
600 words |
Chapter 5- Conclusions and recommendation. |
20% |
1,150 words |
Chapter 6- Reflection |
10% |
4500 words |
7.0. List of references and 8.0. Appendices |
10% |
n/a |
Maximum Word Length
State the number of words used on the assignment front sheet. You may include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. A sliding scale of penalties for excess length will be imposed according to the amount by which the limit has been exceeded.
1-10% excess no penalty
11-20% excess 10% reduction in the mark
21-30% excess 20% reduction in the mark
31%+ excess the work will be capped at a pass
- None of the above penaltieswill be used tochange your mark which is above the pass mark,to one that is below the pass mark. Therefore, the maximum penalty for exceeding the word limit will be a reduction to a pass grade.
Note: Title, reference list, appendices, tables (succinct with bullet points), graphs and figures used within the main body of the report are excluded from the word count.
Useful Information:
Library resources, study and research skills: http://libguides.staffs.ac.uk/libraryresources/
Exceptional Circumstances:
https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/exceptional-circumstances-procedure.jsp
https://www.staffs.ac.uk/support_depts/info_centre/handbook/exceptional/
Regulations: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/Acadregs.jsp
Academic Conduct: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/academic-conduct-procedure.jsp
BUSS60001. Consultancy Project. Assessment 1, 2 and 3 Generic Undergraduate assessment Criteria Level 6
Learning Outcome |
First class |
Upper second |
Lower second |
Third |
Fail |
||||
90-100% |
80-89% |
70-79% |
60-69% |
50-59% |
40-49% |
30-39% |
20-29% |
Below 20% |
|
Knowledge and Understanding Learning Enquiry |
Exceptional Answer demonstrating a highly detailed understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter- relationship with other fields of study; clear appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Exceptional presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
An outstanding answer demonstrating a detailed understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; awareness of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Excellent presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
Excellent knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; clear awareness of the limits of knowledge. Very good presentation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
Very good knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. Some understanding of limits of knowledge. Good presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
Systemic knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. May contain minor errors and/or discussion of irrelevant issues. Adequate presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the key issues raised by the question; coherent knowledge and understanding of its inter- relationship with other fields of study. Limited presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data. |
Unsatisfactory, but shows a limited. grasp of some relevant issues. Limited awareness of ambiguity of knowledge, or ability to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data. |
An attempt to answer the question, but without any significant grasp of material or appropriate skills. Minimal application of knowledge, or use of information. |
No answer offered; or an answer which is totally irrelevant or fundamentally wrong. Shows some evidence of having benefited from the course. |
Analysis Application Problem Solving |
Original, independent thinking, rigorous argument and an impressive use of evidence. Thorough and accurate analysis of subject with evidence of breadth and depth of study. Excellent application of theory to problem. |
Outstanding analysis displaying independent thought and strong, well-organised argument and highly competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems. |
Excellent analysis displaying independent thought and strong and well-organised argument, competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems. |
A very good analysis and well- organised argument, very well supported by evidence. Evidence applied well to provide solution to problems. |
Good analysis and argument, well supported by evidence. Good application of evidence and theory to solve problem. |
Arguments and analysis adequate, accurate and supported by evidence, but may be superficial or limited. Some application of evidence and theory to solve problem. |
Argument and analysis may be illogical, irrelevant, or contradictory in places and/or unsupported by evidence. Limited application of evidence and theory to solve problem. |
Brief, irrelevant or deficient argument and analysis; unsubstantiated generalisations. Little or no attempt to draw conclusions. Little or no attempt to apply evidence and theory to solve problem. |
Absence of analysis and argument. No evidence of application of knowledge to solve problem. Or no answer offered. |
Communication Reflection |
Exceptionally effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Exceptional demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Extremely effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Excellent demonstration of managing own learning and initiative , learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Highly effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Extremely good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Very effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Generally satisfactory communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline but with evident weaknesses. Adequate demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Unsatisfactory communication skills appropriate to this level of study. Poor level of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment. |
Some evidence of communication skills appropriate to this level of study. |
Limited or no evidence of the communication skills appropriate to this level of study. Limited or no evidence of managing own learning or initiative. |
Professional Requirement (Not usually weighted and usually a pass/fail component of assessment) |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by Professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Fails to meet the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Fails to meet the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies. |
Breach of confidentiality of individuals/ organisations from a practice learning setting. |