diff_months: 5

Consultancy Project BUSS60001

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2025-05-15 08:57:29
Order Code: LD523156
Question Task Id: 0


Hand in location:


CECOS


?


Turnitin via Moodle


?

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS


Course:



BA (Hon) Business Management & Sustainability



Module Title:



Consultancy Project



Module Code:


BUSS60001


Assignment Title:


Assessment 1: Project Proposal- word document


Assessment 2: Poster Presentation


Assessment 3: Project Report



Weighting:


Assessment 1: 20%


Assessment 2: 20%


Assessment 3: 60%



Module Lecturer:


Miss. Adiba Hurain


Word Guideline:


Assessment 1: 1,000 words


Assessment 2: 1 page/1,000 words


Assessment 3: 4,000 words



Assignment Timetable:



Date Set:


15/01/2025


Submission Date and Time:


Assessment 1: Project proposal Upload to Turnitin no later than Sunday 16th February 2025.


Ethical Approval documentation- Thursday 13th February 2025.



Assessment 2: Poster uploaded to Turnitin no later than Sunday 16th March 2025.



Assessment 3: Report uploaded to Turnitin no later than Sunday 27th April 2025.



Expected Return:


within 20 working days


Learning Outcomes (LO) to be Assessed:

LO1. Critically evaluate the impact of the external environment on organisations.

Knowledge & Understanding. Enquiry

LO2. Analyse and apply selected investigative techniques to interpret complex business challenges and propose innovative and sustainable solutions.

Enquiry. Learning. Analysis. Application. Problem Solving. Communication

LO3. Plan, manage and implement a live consultancy project.

Application

LO4. Critically assess the practical implications for an organisation, stemming from your research

Analysis. Problem Solving

LO5. Reflect upon and evaluate your research, skills and personal development.

Analysis. Reflection


Assignment set by:


Miss. Adiba Hurain (adiba.tutor@cecos.ac.uk )


Assignment verified by:


Dr. Sajid Kazmi


For all elements of this module, you will be required to work alongside an employer and act as a consultant to identify an area of research which is valuable to the organisation.



It is suggested you choose an organisation from the list provided on the Moodle which is best suited to your current areas of interest and/or career aspirations. You will be involved in real-time problem solving, recommending actions to your client.

Brief for 2025-26

Assessment 1: Project Proposal word document outlining organisational problem as well as possible and proposed solutions. (1,000 words) (20%) (LOs 1 & 2)

A proposal word document, consider exploring the following areas:



  • Introduction of chosen Company (20%)

  • Background /history of chosen company.

  • Aim of issue to be investigated.

  • Research project objectives.

  • Critically evaluate the impact of the external environment on your chosen company.




  • Influencing Literature (40%)

  • Students present academic Literature that must demonstrate their understanding of the literature selected and explain the relevance to their research project.

  • What theories/concepts are you going to be to applying to your organisation: what research, why the research, how much research and when are you going to be conducting this research




  • Proposed Methodology (25%)

  • This section should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the research process and differences between quantitative and qualitative research. [Research onion application]

  • Gantt Chart/planning documentation.

  • Chosen research methods secondary/primary research.




  • Presentation of document (15%)

    • Fully referenced and confirming to Harvard guide

    • Professional, clear, and informative. Creativity in design method chosen.





  • Ethical Approval



For you to be able to conduct this research and work alongside a client of your choice you must ensure you have the Universitys ethical approval. You will submit your ethical approval documentation to Turnitin.

*Please note, these are not the definitive areas, and you should include information that you feel is relevant to your project.

Assessment 2: Poster Presentation- outlining the entire research project. Poster will showcase the context, the problem/issue, the methodological approach, key findings, conclusions, and a reflection on your personal and professional development.

(one Page 1000 words) (20%) (LO5)


[PLEASE view template on Moodle for assistance with layout of poster]

Produce a poster to showcase the content of your project. Ensure the poster has the following: -



  • Introduction to Company (10%)

    • Background /history of the company.

    • Aim and objectives.





  • Methodology (15%)

    • Secondary research to include relevant literature, theories, and concepts.

    • Primary research if conducted.





  • Analysis of the key findings (25%)

    • Pictorial data with supporting evaluating analysis





  • Conclusions and recommendations (25%)

    • What are the recommendations you are making to your organisation?

    • Conclude project referring to your aim.





  • Reflection you must use a reflective model. (10%)

    • Reflecting on the project, what changes would you make if you were to conduct the research again?





  • Document presentation and referencing (15%)

    • Confirms to the Harvard guide.

    • Academic underpinning

    • Showcases the results of the study well.

    • Attractive and information document




Assessment 3. Project Report- Written report outlining the business issue/problem, the methodological approach taken, and the findings from the research process. This must also include conclusions and practical recommendations for the organisation based on the investigation undertaken (4,000 words) (60%) (LOs 3 & 4)


[PLEASE view template on Moodle for assistance with layout of Report]

Using the feedback and research conducted in assessment 1, now plan, manage, and implement your project plan. You are required to research and draw on wider sources of both academic and industry related sources and data to fulfil the module assessment requirements. Students must ensure they conduct a critical reasoned evaluation from research methods chosen and draw robust conclusions and make recommendations relating to the project topic aim. You must also reflect on the research skills and development you have made throughout this module. You may consider exploring the areas in the structure below:

Chapter 1. Introduction of Company [15%]



  • Background/history of the company.

  • Aim, Objectives, and research questions.

  • Brief overview of the external environment of your company.



Chapter 2. Literature Review [15%]



  • What is currently known about this topic.

  • Use literature to inform your project objectives.



Chapter 3- Project Methodology [15%]



  • Research Philosophy Research onion.

  • Analysis of data -quantitative and qualitative.

  • Proof of Ethical Approval (Must be attached in appendices)



Chapter 4- Project Findings [15%]



  • Discussion of findings relevant to the aims and objectives set.

  • Have any patterns been identified in the data collected?



Chapter 5- Conclusion and recommendations [20%]



  • What are the main conclusions: - were the project objectives achieved success/limitations of the research.

  • What are the recommendations: - do they have reference to appropriate underpinning theory and/or frameworks.Are the recommendations provided realistic and achievable for the client?Have you critically assessed the practical implications for your company?



Chapter 6- Reflection [10%] [include a reflective model.]



  • Make comments on how the experience has impacted your skills set and employability prospects.If you were to complete this project again, what would you do differently?



7.0. list of references and 8.0. Appendices [10%]



  • Gantt chart schedule including milestones.

  • Communications with client

  • Recommendations tools created.


Task Marks and Word Count 60%


Weighting


Word count-4,000


Chapter 1- Introduction


15%


600 words


Chapter 2- Literature Review


15%


600 words


Chapter 3- Project Methodology


15%


600 words


Chapter 4- Project findings


15%


600 words


Chapter 5- Conclusions and recommendation.


20%


1,150 words


Chapter 6- Reflection


10%


4500 words


7.0. List of references and 8.0. Appendices


10%


n/a

Maximum Word Length

State the number of words used on the assignment front sheet. You may include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. A sliding scale of penalties for excess length will be imposed according to the amount by which the limit has been exceeded.

1-10% excess no penalty

11-20% excess 10% reduction in the mark

21-30% excess 20% reduction in the mark

31%+ excess the work will be capped at a pass



  1. None of the above penaltieswill be used tochange your mark which is above the pass mark,to one that is below the pass mark. Therefore, the maximum penalty for exceeding the word limit will be a reduction to a pass grade.



Note: Title, reference list, appendices, tables (succinct with bullet points), graphs and figures used within the main body of the report are excluded from the word count.

Useful Information:

Library resources, study and research skills: http://libguides.staffs.ac.uk/libraryresources/

Exceptional Circumstances:

https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/exceptional-circumstances-procedure.jsp

https://www.staffs.ac.uk/support_depts/info_centre/handbook/exceptional/

Regulations: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/Acadregs.jsp

Academic Conduct: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/academic-conduct-procedure.jsp

BUSS60001. Consultancy Project. Assessment 1, 2 and 3 Generic Undergraduate assessment Criteria Level 6


Learning


Outcome


First class


Upper second


Lower second


Third


Fail


90-100%


80-89%


70-79%


60-69%


50-59%


40-49%


30-39%


20-29%


Below 20%


Knowledge and Understanding


Learning


Enquiry


Exceptional


Answer


demonstrating a


highly detailed understanding of the issues and


methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its


inter-


relationship with other fields of study; clear appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Exceptional presentation and evaluation of qualitative and


quantitative data.


An outstanding


answer


demonstrating a


detailed understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; awareness of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Excellent presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.



Excellent


knowledge and


understanding of


the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; clear awareness of the limits of knowledge.


Very good presentation of qualitative and quantitative data.


Very good


knowledge and


understanding of


the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. Some understanding of limits of knowledge. Good presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.


Systemic


knowledge and


understanding of


the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. May contain minor errors and/or discussion of irrelevant issues. Adequate presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.


Satisfactory


knowledge and


understanding of


the key issues raised by the question; coherent knowledge and understanding of its inter- relationship with other fields of study. Limited presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.


Unsatisfactory, but


shows a limited.


grasp of some


relevant issues. Limited awareness of ambiguity of knowledge, or ability to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data.


An attempt to


answer the


question, but


without any significant grasp of material or appropriate skills. Minimal application of knowledge, or use of information.


No answer


offered; or an


answer which


is totally irrelevant or fundamentally wrong.


Shows some


evidence of having benefited from the course.


Analysis


Application


Problem Solving


Original,


independent


thinking, rigorous argument and an impressive use of evidence. Thorough and accurate analysis of subject with evidence of breadth and depth of study. Excellent application of theory to problem.


Outstanding


analysis displaying


independent thought and strong, well-organised argument and highly competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems.


Excellent analysis


displaying


independent thought and strong and well-organised argument, competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems.


A very good


analysis and well-


organised argument, very well supported by evidence.


Evidence applied


well to provide solution to problems.


Good analysis and


argument, well


supported by evidence. Good application of evidence and theory to solve problem.


Arguments and


analysis adequate,


accurate and supported by evidence, but may be superficial or limited.


Some application of evidence and theory to solve problem.


Argument and


analysis may be


illogical, irrelevant, or contradictory in places and/or unsupported by evidence.


Limited application of evidence and theory to solve problem.


Brief,


irrelevant or


deficient argument and analysis; unsubstantiated generalisations. Little or no


attempt to


draw conclusions. Little or no attempt to apply evidence and theory to solve problem.


Absence of


analysis and


argument. No evidence of application of knowledge to solve problem. Or no answer offered.


Communication



Reflection


Exceptionally


effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Exceptional demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Extremely effective


communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline.


Excellent demonstration of managing own learning and initiative , learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Highly effective


communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Extremely good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Very effective


communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline.


Good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Effective


communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Generally


satisfactory communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline but with evident weaknesses. Adequate demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Unsatisfactory


communication skills appropriate to this level of study. Poor level of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.


Some evidence


of communication skills appropriate to this level of study.


Limited or no


evidence of the communication skills appropriate to this level of study.


Limited or no


evidence of managing own learning or initiative.


Professional


Requirement


(Not usually weighted and


usually a pass/fail component of assessment)


Meets the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Meets the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Meets the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Meets the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Meets the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by


Professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Fails to meet the


competencies or standards of proficiency required by


professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Fails to meet


the competencies or standards of proficiency


required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.


Breach of confidentiality of individuals/ organisations from a practice learning setting.

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : May 15th, 2025
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 117

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more