Criteria Description Marks To gain high marks for this section:
Criteria Description Marks To gain high marks for this section:
1: Content Describe and demonstrate understanding of the relevant law 10 Demonstrate an accurate and comprehensive knowledge of the relevant law, and a high ability to analyse and apply it and other relevant material to answer the question; demonstrate originality or flair; work is interesting, well read or scholarly.
2: Style Write using correct citation and referencing, free from plagiarism 5 Use correct AGLC citation and referencing for all relevant points.
3: Language Style and structure 10 Writing logically structured using subheadings. Sentence and paragraph length assist readability. Language is clear, concise and precise. Writing free of spelling errors and grammatical mistakes.
Assessment Two
Choose one of the following cases to read and summarise:
Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375
Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162
Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services (NT) v JWB and SMB (Marions Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218
Briefly outline the procedural history, material facts, legal issues and judgment/s (reasons for the decision and dissenting judgments if there are any). Give an example of how it has been used (for example: applied, distinguished or overturned) in a later case.
(1000 words: 20%)
Due date: 9th April 2023
