CRKC4004 Fundamentals of Business
CRKC4004 Fundamentals of Business
Final Assignment Brief
General Instructions Please read these instructions carefully
You are required to complete the assignment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based on a 3,000 word portfolio that includes evidence of a combination of the activities you have undertaken in the module.
The portfolio should be presented as ONE document made up of a number of sections. It should be presented formally with a title page, an abstract, and a contents page. The portfolio can include figures, tables and quotations (all of which do not count towards the word count).
The portfolio should include the following three activities:
Forum Contributions (15%)
Include a log of all the contributions you have made to the forum. Your contributions should be included in a table labelled according to each unit and the forum task(s). You can include your contributions as a screen shot of your posts or you can cut and paste these from the forum. This table is not included in the word count, but it evidences your engagement with the materials in each of the units. You will be awarded 5% of the marks based on your contribution to each of the six units.
Total marks awarded 5%.
Based on the log of all your forum contributions, reflect on ONE forum exercise or task that you found particularly interesting. This reflection should include
an explanation as to why you found this interesting
a summary of the discussion in the forum
a summary of what you learned from the forum discussion including any responses to your contribution (300 words)
Total marks awarded 10%
Self Evaluation (10%)
You must complete each of the quizzes for units 1, 3 and 6. Keep a record of your quiz scores and present them in your portfolio. Once completed, write a brief appraisal of your performance and areas for improvement (150 words)
Total marks awarded 10%
Ethics Essay (75%)
Question Scenario:
A policy is under consideration in the legislative body in the nation of New Queendom where 1% of the population would be forced to live and work as slaves in a manufacturing facility to produce computer chips. Proponents of this policy argue that if enacted into law, it would result in lower prices for desktop consumers in New Queendom. They argue that it would also likely result in the happiness of 99% of the population who are not enslaved, because they would be able to purchase computer-based appliances (mobile phones, computers, tablets etc) at much lower prices and lead to inventions that would benefit mankind. This means that 99% of the population will benefit at the expense of the remaining 1%.
You are the CEO of a computer manufacturing company your competitors are supporting this law and lobbying the government to introduce it. What would your ethical position be?
(2,500 words)
In your answer draw on the theory of ethics to describe a Utilitarian, Universalist, Justice and Virtue ethics approach to this ethical dilemma. Make sure you identify the different stakeholders impacted by this decision. Based on the four ethical approaches to this dilemma that you have presented, you must highlight the ethical decision/position you would take based on the reasoning you have presented.
Guidance for each of the three required elements of the portfolio
1 Forum contributions (15%)
Include a log of contributions you have made to the forum exercises.
To get excellent marks in this section
You need to engage well with materials and make sure you do the exercises required and contribute your answers to the forum. By engaging in debate and discussion you will improve your learning and understanding of the management topics covered in each of the module units.
Reflect on ONE forum exercise or task that you found particularly interesting.
To get excellent marks in this section
Choose ONE task that that you contributed to the forum. Make sure you do the tasks well. Based on this, explain why you found this interesting, summarise the forum discussion, explain what you learned from the forum discussion including any responses to your contribution your abilities. Stick to 300 words and make sure that you refer to the contributions of others to this task in your discussion. This allows you to demonstrate a range of your skills and encourage your engagement with the module content.
2 Self Evaluation (10%)
Complete the three quizzes
To get excellent marks in this section
Make sure you complete ALL the quizzes. Make sure you include your scores. Your evaluation should be open reflective and demonstrate self-awareness and an ability to be able to identify where you can improve your performance.
3 Essay: Ethics (75%)
For this piece of work, you will draw on the theory of ethics. You must apply the Utilitarian, Universalist, Justice and Virtue ethics approach to the ethical dilemma presented in the case. In your description make sure you clearly identify who the stakeholders are that might be impacted in the decision you are making. Make sure you conclude by highlighting the ethical decision/position you would take and the approach you would adopt. (2500 words)
To get excellent marks in this section
Describe each of the four ethical approaches drawing on the literature. Support your reasoning on the ethical dilemma presented using the four ethics approaches required Utilitarian, Universalist, Justice and Virtu with the literature. Present each approach clearly and apply the theoretical approach to the case presented. Support your presentation with citations and references think about the presentation tips as well as the content. To allow you to practice presenting to a different audience, show your presentation skills, and apply some of the learning in a work-related context so you can see where theory and practice come together.
Make sure your essay is well-written, well-cited,well-referenced clearly structured and is free of spelling, grammatical and language errors. Make sure you include a list of references that are correctly formatted (Harvard style).
Criteria Max Mark Achievable Mark Awarded Comments
Include a log of all the contributions you have made to the forum. Have you included your contributions? Have you labelled these clearly according to unit and task? Have you made contributions to all of the forum exercises in the 6 units? 5%
Reflect on ONE forum exercise that you found particularly interesting.
Have you included an explanation as to why you found this interesting?
Have you presented a summary of the discussion about the selected topic in the forum? Have you included a summary of what you learned from the forum discussion and the responses to your entry (300 words) 10%
Self-Evaluation of Quizzes
Have you completed each of the quizzes for units 1, 3 and 6? Have you presented your scores in the portfolio? Have you included a brief appraisal of your performance and areas for improvement (150 words) 10%
Ethics Essay
Have you described a Utilitarian, Universalist, Justice and Virtue ethics approach to the ethical dilemma? Have you identified the stakeholder impacted by this decision? Have you clearly highlighted the ethical decision/position you would take based on the reasoning you have presented? 75%
Final Mark /100
Criteria and Weighting To obtain 70% or above: To obtain 60% or above: To obtain 55 59%: To obtain 50% - 54%: To obtain 49 - 40 %: To obtain fail of between 39 - 35%: To obtain a substantive fail <35
1a .A log of forum posts
showing engagement with the module (5%) Excellent engagement with the forums. All posts demonstrate thoughtfulness, own knowledge, and respond to other posts by classmates. Very good engagement with the forums. Many posts demonstrate thoughtfulness, own knowledge and several respond to other posts by classmates Good engagement with the forums. Some posts demonstrate some of the following: thoughtfulness, own knowledge, or response to other posts by classmates. Some engagement with the forums. Few posts demonstrate thoughtfulness, own knowledge or limited response to other posts by classmates. Poor or low engagement with the forums. Posts fail to demonstrate thoughtfulness, own knowledge, or no response to other posts by classmates. No or very low engagement with forums. LOG missing from report
1b. Reflecting on ONE forum exercise (10%) Excellent explanation of why the task was interesting. The summary of learning developed from the task selected is completed to a high standard and the task was completed to a high standard
Very good explanation of the task, and why it was interesting. The summary was completed to a very good standard and demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and is supported with a good explanation and commentary of the learning. Good explanation of the task selected and why it was interesting, but some aspects may be missing. The summary of the discussion is good. The answer demonstrates some understanding of the issues. Some explanation of the task selected and why it was interesting. The summary of the discussion might have some elements missing. The answer demonstrate some understanding of the issues, but some aspects may be missing. Limited explanation of the task selected. The summary might be incomplete or unclear. There is very limited understanding of the issues.
Either a summary of the discussion is missing or the summary is incomplete. The answer fails to demonstrate understanding of the issues.
There is no reflection of the completed task. And/Or the task is not completed. And/or there is no evidence of understanding of the issues.
2 . Self-Evaluation of Quizzes (10%) All three quizzes have been completed.
The scores for each of the quizzes is presented.
An excellent critical reflection on personal performance identifying areas for improvement All three quizzes have been completed. The scores for each of the quizzes is presented. A very good critical reflection on personal performance. At least two of the quizzes have been completed. The scores for each of the quizzes is presented.
A good critical reflection on personal performance. A t least two of the quizzes have been completed. The scores for each of the quizzes is presented. Some critical reflection on personal performance Two of the quizzes have been completed. The scores for each of the quizzes is not presented. Limited critical reflection on personal performance Only one quiz has been completed. No scores are includes. A brief commentary with little in depth reflection on performance. Quizzes have not been completed and the commentary is missing or very brief.
3. Ethics Essay
(75%) Excellent description of a 4 approaches to the ethical dilemma. Extensive use of supporting literature to explain or support the points made which is correctly cited and has a full reference list. Very well written with no grammatical or spelling errors. Very good description of 4 approaches to the ethical dilemma. Key factors are identified and explained with support of literature Wide use of supporting literature to explain the points made which is correctly cited and has a full reference list. Well written with very minor spelling or grammatical errors Good description of 4 approaches. Key factors are identified and explained but some aspects might be missing. Many with support of literature. Good use of supporting literature to explain or support many elements of the reflection which is correctly cited and has a full reference list. Well written with very minor spelling or grammatical errors General description of 4 approaches. Some key factors are identified and explained with some support of the literature. to explain or support some of the points. Mostly correctly cited with a full reference list.
Well written. Some minor errors in referencing and/or language. A general description of some of the approaches but some aspects might be missing. Some key factors, are explained. Limited use of the literature to explain or support the points made. Some errors in citations and references and/or language Little evidence of describing and/or understanding of the ethical issues that should be considered by a manager. Little or no support from the literature. Errors in referencing , citations and/or language. Answer is very short and does not address the brief or most of the elements required are missing.
Fundamentals of Business
Final Assignment
Student name: Mariam Maher Aburima
Student ID: 2205160
Word Count:
Table of Content
Forum Contribution
log of all the contributions right202565
31750159385
right208719
right2537460
right2428778
B. Explanation of Interest:
I found this discussion on the differentiation between leadership and management particularly intriguing due to its practical implications in organizational dynamics. The breakdown of leadership and management into distinct dimensionssuch as vision vs. implementation, people vs. tasks, change vs. stability, inspiration vs. control, and long-term vs. short-term goalsprovides a comprehensive framework for understanding the intricacies of these roles. The discussion delves into the nuanced aspects of each, illustrating how they complement and intersect with one another in the context of effective organizational functioning. This conceptual exploration resonates with the reality that successful leadership often entails managerial skills, and effective management may embody leadership qualities.
Summary of the Forum Discussion:
The forum discussion explored the key differences between leadership and management through various dimensions, shedding light on the unique aspects that define each role. Participants in the forum discussed how leaders focus on vision, inspiration, and long-term goals, whereas managers are more oriented towards implementation, control, and short-term objectives. The dynamic relationship between people and tasks, change and stability, as well as inspiration and control, was a central theme in the conversation. The consensus emerged that both leadership and management are integral to organizational success, necessitating a harmonious integration of their respective skills.
Learnings and Contributions:
My contribution to the forum centered around the acknowledgment that effective leaders often embody managerial elements, and successful managers may possess leadership qualities. I emphasized the interconnected nature of these roles in practical scenarios, highlighting the need for a balanced blend of leadership and management for optimal organizational performance. In response to my contribution, fellow forum members expanded on the idea, sharing real-world examples where leaders demonstrated effective management skills and vice versa. The discussions reinforced my understanding that a versatile approach that combines both leadership and management qualities is crucial for navigating the complexities of organizational dynamics and achieving sustained success. Overall, the forum provided valuable insights into the intricate interplay between leadership and management in the business landscape.
Self-evaluation
Reflecting on my performance in the fundamentals of business quizzes, I am pleased with my strong grasp of Unit 1, achieving an impressive 93%. This indicates a solid understanding of foundational concepts. However, there's a noticeable dip in Unit 3, where I secured 81%. Identifying the areas that contributed to this decline will be crucial for improvement. In Unit 6, I scored 69%, highlighting a significant challenge that requires focused attention. To enhance my overall performance, I plan to review Unit 3 thoroughly, addressing any gaps in understanding, and dedicating extra effort to master the content in Unit 6. This self-awareness will guide my focused efforts toward improvement, ensuring a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of the fundamentals of business.
