descriptors Achieved beyond expectations

Performance

descriptors Achieved beyond expectations

Goes beyond expectations of performance at this level, exceptional quality.

Achieved as expected

Quality of output is consistent with expectations at this level.

Partially achieved Satisfies minimum requirements for acceptable quality of output.

Not achieved

Does not satisfy minimum requirements for quality of output to be acceptable.

Assessment Criteria (Meeting these criteria will result in a mark within the Achieved as expected column, i.e. a Credit mark)

POINTS AVAILABLE POINTS AWARDED Comments

Lists relevant use cases for the Dispatcher, selecting appropriate names.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Use case diagram covers most actors and uses cases in the scenario while being consistent with prior list of use cases.

8-10 6-7 5 0-4 Use case diagram syntax predominantly follows good naming practices and appropriate notation as presented in the course.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Use case is mostly viable, clear, and complete.

12-15 9-11 7.5-8 0-7 Activity diagram shows clear sequence and covers the main aspects of the scenario.

8-10 6-7 5 0-4 Activity diagram syntax is used correctly most of the time follows good naming practices and uses appropriate notation as presented during the course.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Interview transcript: Answers show some depth, responses are mostly realistic and plausible (i.e. one could almost believe they are actual users answers)

8-10 6-7 5 0-4 Personas provide sufficient information for a reader to form a mental image of who the users are, although there may be minor gaps (e.g. too much focus on the scenario rather than on the personas life).

8-10 6-7 5 0-4 Matrix of User Stories to personas is more than a simple table it is used effectively to show differences between personas.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Provides a complete set of storyboards that expose the richness of the environment. E.g. where an event is taking place, how user use the product, what is likely to interrupt, etc.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Information Architecture / Look-and-feel is an appropriate and functional structure; there is a solid l/f guide for the design.

8-10 6-7 5 0-4 Terminology is mostly consistent between answers.

(Beyond expectations if it includes a glossary)

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0-2 Overall presentation is of good quality:

visual style is consistent,

almost completely free of spelling and

grammar issues,

diagrams are legible.

4-5 3-3.5 2.5 0.2 Summary