Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
- Subject Code :
MLL-394
MLL 394 Migration and Refugee Law and Policy
T3 2022
Assignment 1 Case Note
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:40%
Learning Outcome Details
GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO4: Critical thinking
ULO3: Apply relevant reasoning and interpretation to analyse and critique a
case and to construct written responses to legal fact patterns
Assessment Feedback:
Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and feedback on CloudDeakin on by January 18, 2023.
Description / Requirements
You are required to write a case note about the following case:
Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3
The purpose of a case note is to critically analyse the significance of a judgment from a legal and societal perspective. You may agree or disagree with the approach taken by the court but your analysis must be supported by primary and secondary sources. Your answer should consider the implications of the decision for the development of the area/s of migration law considered in the case, as well as the larger societal context.
You are required to do more than simply describe the facts and the outcome (see the marking criteria below).
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
- Theassignmentiscompulsoryandworth40%ofthefinalmarkforthe
- Assignments are counted as on time if submitted via Cloud Deakin by 08:00pm AEST on the due A penalty will be applied if it is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date. There isno de minimis exceptionto the penalty deadline. Any submission after the penalty deadline will count as late and will receive the relevant penalty.
- Word countThe assignment is 2000 words (including footnotes and bibliography). You are permitted a 10% leeway in relation to the word count. If you submit an assignment above or below this, you will be penalized 4 marks for every 100 words thereof. You must include a word
- The assignment must be presented in size 12 font with 1.5 line spacing. Pages must be
- You should use headings and sub-headings to structure your
- You should thoroughly proof-read your paper for typographical, spelling and grammatical errors before submitting
- The assignment must be footnoted correctly, include a bibliography and conform to theAustralian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed). You should ensure that you properly attribute and reference all source materials. Assignments will be scanned for plagiarism using the Turnitin Plagiarism Detection Software. Please refer to the Unit Guide for further information about avoiding plagiarism and collusionandnotethepenaltiesforplagiarismandacademic
- Be sure to carefully read the rubric before finalizing your work.
Submission Instructions
- StudentsmustsubmitassignmentselectronicallyviaCloud
- AssignmentsmustbesubmittedasaWord(.doc) or (.docx)document
- Questions about the assignment can be posted on the Assignment discussion board on Cloud Deakin.
- Extensions: Extensions are not granted lightly, as they will disrupt the marking process and are unfair to most students who have complied with the submission
- If you are experiencingserious and exceptionalcircumstances that arebeyond your control(such as significant medical conditions of a serious nature, immediate family death or breakdown, or hardship/trauma; not travel, computer failure, or work commitments) contact the Unit Chair via emailwith supporting documentation(such as a medical certificate, statutory declaration, etc). Extensions of up to 10 calendar days from the due date may be granted at the Unit Chairs discretion. Extensions will not be given beyond this time, unless there are truly exceptional
You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit,until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced,you will need to submit your backup copy.
Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.
When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site,you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted.You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload,and check for,and keep,the email receipt for the submission.
Notes
- Penalties for late submission:The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. 'Day' means calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.
- For more information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the documentYour rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unitin the first folder next to the Unit Guide of the Resources area in the CloudDeakin unit site.
- Building evidence of your experiences, skills and knowledge (Portfolio)- Building a portfolio that evidences your skills, knowledge and experience will provide you with a valuable tool to help you prepare for interviews and to showcase to potential employers. There are a number of tools that you can use to build a portfolio. You are provided with cloud space through OneDrive, or through the Portfolio tool in the Cloud Unit Site, but you can use any storage repository system that you like. Remember that a Portfolio is YOUR tool. You should be able to store your assessment work, reflections, achievements and artefacts in YOUR Portfolio. Once you have completed this assessment piece, add it to your personal Portfolio to use and showcase your learning later, when applying for jobs, or further studies. Curate your work by adding meaningful tags to your artefacts that describe what the artefact represents.
Rubric on following page: please read and consult carefully.
MLL 394 Migration and Refugee Law - Trimester 3, 2022 - Written Assignment Rubric and Marking Guide
Criteria |
Fail/not attempted |
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Very Good |
Outstanding |
Mark |
Assignment Content (20 marks)
|
Most key issues not identified No or essentially no analysis Assignment instructions largely ignored No conclusion (0-4.5 marks) |
Failed to identify key issues
(5-9.5 marks) |
Identified most key issues
(10-11.5 marks) |
Good discussion of key issues
(12-13.5 marks) |
Very good discussion of topic
Arguments well developed and supported
(14-15.5 marks) |
Comprehensive discussion
(16+ marks) |
/20 |
Evidence/Research 30% Recent and up-to-date sources |
No evidence of research beyond course materials and the case itself (0-2.5 marks) |
There was very little evidence of research or reliance on prescribed Unit materials or non-academic sources (3-5.5 marks)
|
Refers to some primary and secondary sources but important ones overlooked
(6-7 marks) |
Some reference to quality primary and secondary sources which were used to justify the argument at times but further use of legal materials is required Used few online summaries of the case in their referencing (7.5-8 marks) |
Well researched
Used very few online summaries of the case in their referencing (8.5-9.5 marks) |
Thoroughly researched with reference to high quality legal resources
Used no summaries of the case in their referencing (10+ marks) |
/12 |
Quality of Presentation 15% |
Writing and presentation significantly below the minimally acceptable professional standard (0-1 marks) |
Disorganised, unstructured and difficult to follow
Does not comply with the AGLC (1.5-2.5 marks) |
Some organisation but structure and clarity lacking at times
(3-3.5 marks) |
Generally organised and coherent
(4 marks) |
Well presented, logical structure
(4.5 marks) |
Well presented with clear and concise expression
(5+ marks)
|
/6 |
Complies with Instructions 5% |
Does not conform with assignment instructions at all (0 marks) |
Largely does not conform with assignment instructions (0.5 marks) |
Somewhat conformed with assignment instructions (1 mark) |
Generally conformed with assignment instructions (1.3 marks) |
Mostly conformed with assignment instructions (1.5 marks) |
Conformed with assignment instructions (2 marks) |
/2 |
Total and any other comments |
|
Comments:
|
/40 |