diff_months: 9

Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2024-12-21 20:30:26
Order Code: SA Student Adithi Law Assignment(12_22_31121_307)
Question Task Id: 481825
  • Subject Code :

    MLL-394

MLL 394 Migration and Refugee Law and Policy

T3 2022

Assignment 1 Case Note

PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:40%

Learning Outcome Details

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO4: Critical thinking

ULO3: Apply relevant reasoning and interpretation to analyse and critique a
case and to construct written responses to legal fact patterns

Assessment Feedback:

Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and feedback on CloudDeakin on by January 18, 2023.

Description / Requirements

You are required to write a case note about the following case:

Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3

The purpose of a case note is to critically analyse the significance of a judgment from a legal and societal perspective. You may agree or disagree with the approach taken by the court but your analysis must be supported by primary and secondary sources. Your answer should consider the implications of the decision for the development of the area/s of migration law considered in the case, as well as the larger societal context.

You are required to do more than simply describe the facts and the outcome (see the marking criteria below).

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

  1. Theassignmentiscompulsoryandworth40%ofthefinalmarkforthe

  1. Assignments are counted as on time if submitted via Cloud Deakin by 08:00pm AEST on the due A penalty will be applied if it is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date. There isno de minimis exceptionto the penalty deadline. Any submission after the penalty deadline will count as late and will receive the relevant penalty.

  1. Word countThe assignment is 2000 words (including footnotes and bibliography). You are permitted a 10% leeway in relation to the word count. If you submit an assignment above or below this, you will be penalized 4 marks for every 100 words thereof. You must include a word

  1. The assignment must be presented in size 12 font with 1.5 line spacing. Pages must be

  1. You should use headings and sub-headings to structure your

  1. You should thoroughly proof-read your paper for typographical, spelling and grammatical errors before submitting

  1. The assignment must be footnoted correctly, include a bibliography and conform to theAustralian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed). You should ensure that you properly attribute and reference all source materials. Assignments will be scanned for plagiarism using the Turnitin Plagiarism Detection Software. Please refer to the Unit Guide for further information about avoiding plagiarism and collusionandnotethepenaltiesforplagiarismandacademic

  1. Be sure to carefully read the rubric before finalizing your work.

Submission Instructions

  1. StudentsmustsubmitassignmentselectronicallyviaCloud

  1. AssignmentsmustbesubmittedasaWord(.doc) or (.docx)document

  1. Questions about the assignment can be posted on the Assignment discussion board on Cloud Deakin.

  1. Extensions: Extensions are not granted lightly, as they will disrupt the marking process and are unfair to most students who have complied with the submission
  • If you are experiencingserious and exceptionalcircumstances that arebeyond your control(such as significant medical conditions of a serious nature, immediate family death or breakdown, or hardship/trauma; not travel, computer failure, or work commitments) contact the Unit Chair via emailwith supporting documentation(such as a medical certificate, statutory declaration, etc). Extensions of up to 10 calendar days from the due date may be granted at the Unit Chairs discretion. Extensions will not be given beyond this time, unless there are truly exceptional

You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit,until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced,you will need to submit your backup copy.

Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.

When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site,you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted.You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload,and check for,and keep,the email receipt for the submission.

Notes

  • Penalties for late submission:The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. 'Day' means calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.
  • For more information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the documentYour rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unitin the first folder next to the Unit Guide of the Resources area in the CloudDeakin unit site.
  • Building evidence of your experiences, skills and knowledge (Portfolio)- Building a portfolio that evidences your skills, knowledge and experience will provide you with a valuable tool to help you prepare for interviews and to showcase to potential employers. There are a number of tools that you can use to build a portfolio. You are provided with cloud space through OneDrive, or through the Portfolio tool in the Cloud Unit Site, but you can use any storage repository system that you like. Remember that a Portfolio is YOUR tool. You should be able to store your assessment work, reflections, achievements and artefacts in YOUR Portfolio. Once you have completed this assessment piece, add it to your personal Portfolio to use and showcase your learning later, when applying for jobs, or further studies. Curate your work by adding meaningful tags to your artefacts that describe what the artefact represents.

Rubric on following page: please read and consult carefully.

MLL 394 Migration and Refugee Law - Trimester 3, 2022 - Written Assignment Rubric and Marking Guide

Criteria

Fail/not attempted

Unsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Outstanding

Mark

Assignment Content

(20 marks)


Accuracy and depth of knowledge of subject matter


Appropriateness and clarity of structure/approach


Depth and quality of legal/critical analysis and reasoning

Most key issues not identified

No or essentially no analysis

Assignment instructions largely ignored

No conclusion

(0-4.5 marks)

Failed to identify key issues


Insufficient analysis of issues


Failed to adequately address the assignment question


Conclusions not based on argument

(5-9.5 marks)

Identified most key issues


Limited critical analysis of the issues


Mainly descriptive


Argument unclear at times and under-developed or not well supported

(10-11.5 marks)

Good discussion of key issues


Some analysis of key issues


Addressed main themes of the assignment


Arguments underdeveloped or not persuasive and with limited critical evaluation

(12-13.5 marks)

Very good discussion of topic


Very good analysis

Arguments well developed and supported


Well argued, demonstrating critical evaluation of key issues


Addressed most issues raised

(14-15.5 marks)

Comprehensive discussion


Excellent analysis


Persuasively argued demonstrating excellent critical evaluation of issues

(16+ marks)

/20

Evidence/Research 30%
Quality, depth and relevance of resources

Recent and up-to-date sources

No evidence of research beyond course materials and the case itself

(0-2.5 marks)

There was very little evidence of research or reliance on prescribed Unit materials or non-academic sources

(3-5.5 marks)

Refers to some primary and secondary sources but important ones overlooked


Sources were used in a descriptive rather than analytical manner indicating limited understanding of key issues

(6-7 marks)

Some reference to quality primary and secondary sources which were used to justify the argument at times but further use of legal materials is required

Used few online summaries of the case in their referencing

(7.5-8 marks)

Well researched


Very good discussion of issues with reference to quality materials


Appropriate use of sources to justify arguments

Used very few online summaries of the case in their referencing

(8.5-9.5 marks)

Thoroughly researched with reference to high quality legal resources


Effective use of sources to support arguments

Used no summaries of the case in their referencing

(10+ marks)

/12

Quality of Presentation 15%
Writing style, grammar, appropriate referencing
Compliance with AGLC-4 in footnoting and citations

Writing and presentation significantly below the minimally acceptable professional standard

(0-1 marks)

Disorganised, unstructured and difficult to follow


Numerous grammatical, spelling and/or typographical errors


Inadequate citation of sources

Does not comply with the AGLC

(1.5-2.5 marks)

Some organisation but structure and clarity lacking at times


Some grammatical, spelling and/or typographical errors


Several missing, incomplete or incorrect citations

(3-3.5 marks)

Generally organised and coherent


Grammar and spelling accurate but with some errors


Some missing or incomplete citations

(4 marks)

Well presented, logical structure


Grammar and spelling accurate


Authorities and sources correctly cited in compliance with the AGLC

(4.5 marks)

Well presented with clear and concise expression


Accurate spelling, grammar and punctuation


Well structured, providing clear analysis


Complete citation of authorities in compliance with the AGLC

(5+ marks)

/6

Complies with Instructions 5%

Does not conform with assignment instructions at all

(0 marks)

Largely does not conform with assignment instructions

(0.5 marks)

Somewhat conformed with assignment instructions

(1 mark)

Generally conformed with assignment instructions

(1.3 marks)

Mostly conformed with assignment instructions

(1.5 marks)

Conformed with assignment instructions

(2 marks)

/2

Total and any other comments

Comments:

/40

  • Uploaded By : Nivesh
  • Posted on : December 21st, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 151

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more