Due: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:00Due: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:00
Written Essay
Due: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:00Due: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:00
Ungraded, 35 Possible Points35Points Possible
Attempt
In Progress
NEXT UP: Submit assignment
Add comment
Unlimited Attempts Allowed
Details
Assessment 3Written Essay
Assessment Type Essay
Purpose This assessment is assessing Learning Outcome 3 which requires you to critically analyse the interaction between communities and their social and physical environment and the ways in which these factors may impact on a persons clinical presentation, access to health care and ability to comply with a health plan within rural and remote areas.
Description This short essay requires you to choose a priority health condition and explore person centred models of care that would be suitable in promoting health and wellbeing including risk factor modifications for your chosen health condition.
This assessment is assessing Learning Outcome 3 which requires you to critically analyse the interaction between communities and their social and physical environment and the ways in which these factors may impact on a persons clinical presentation, access to health care and ability to comply with a health plan within rural and remote areas, so please ensure you address these concepts within your essay.
NOTE: Short essays can be more difficult to write than longer assessments so you must be succinct and choose your concepts for exploration carefully. You should only include a very brief introduction and conclusion.
Weighting 35%
Compulsory Requirements Attempt / Submission Requirement Students must attempt/submit this assessment item to pass the course.
Length 1000 Words
Due Date Friday 23 February 2024 at 23:00 Australian Eastern Daylight Savings Time (AEDT)
Submission Method Online via Canvas
Assessment Criteria See Rubric
Return Method Online
Feedback Provided Online within 3 weeks from submission date
Opportunity to Reattempt Students WILL NOT be given the opportunity to re-attempt this assessment.
A re-attempt will be considered in line with the Adverse Circumstances Policy
View Rubric
Appendix 1: Assessment 2 Short Essay
Appendix 1: Assessment 2 Short Essay
Criteria Ratings Points
Criterion 1
view longer description 6 to >5.04 pts
High Distinction
Outstanding exploration of priority health condition related to the chosen health area. Outstanding use of contemporary literature and policy documents to support discussion.
5.04 to >4.44 pts
Distinction
Excellent exploration of priority health condition related to the chosen health area. Excellent use of contemporary literature and policy documents to support discussion.
4.44 to >3.84 pts
Credit
Appropriate exploration of priority health condition related to the chosen health area (some limitations noted). Use of literature and some policy documents to support discussion.
3.84 to >2.94 pts
Pass
Adequate exploration of priority health condition related to the chosen health area (some omissions and limitations noted). Limited use of literature and policy documents to support discussion.
2.94 to >0 pts
Fail
Inadequate exploration of priority health condition and chosen health area. Inadequate use of literature and policy documents to support discussion. If did not attempt this section - 0 marks. / 6 pts
Criterion 2
view longer description 8 to >6.72 pts
High Distinction
Outstanding exploration of person-centred models of care and the contribution they make to improving health and wellbeing. Critical discussion of the role of risk factor modification related to your chosen health condition.
6.72 to >5.92 pts
Distinction
Excellent exploration of person-centred models of care and the contribution they make to improving health and wellbeing. Insightful discussion of the role of risk factor modification related to your chosen health condition.
5.92 to >5.12 pts
Credit
Appropriate exploration of person-centred models of care and the contribution they make to improving health and wellbeing. Some discussion of the role of risk factor modification related to your chosen health condition.
5.12 to >3.92 pts
Pass
Adequate exploration of person-centred models of care and the contribution they make to improving health and wellbeing. Limited discussion of the role of risk factor modification related to your chosen health condition.
3.92 to >0 pts
Fail
Limited exploration of person-centred models of care and the contribution they make to improving health and wellbeing. Limited discussion, or major omissions in discussion on the role of risk factor modification related to your chosen health condition. If did not attempt this section - 0 marks. / 8 pts
Criterion 3
view longer description 10 to >8.4 pts
High Distinction
Outstanding critical analysis of the social determinants of health and the impact they have on people with the priority health condition in the chosen population.
8.4 to >7.4 pts
Distinction
Excellent critical analysis of the social determinants of health and the impact they have on people with the priority health condition in the chosen population.
7.4 to >6.4 pts
Credit
Appropriate analysis of the social determinants of health and the impact they have on people with the priority health condition in the chosen population. Some limitations noted in integration of context, and the impact it has on a persons clinical presentation, access to health care and ability to comply with a health plan.
6.4 to >4.9 pts
Pass
Adequate discussion of the social determinants of health and some discussion of the impact they have on people with the priority health condition in the chosen population. Lacks a critically analysis Limitations noted in integration of context, and the impact it has on a persons clinical presentation, access to health care and ability to comply with a health plan.
4.9 to >0 pts
Fail
Inadequate description of the social determinations of health. Limited discussion, or major omissions in context, and the impact it has on a persons clinical presentation, access to health care and ability to comply with a health plan. If did not attempt this section - 0 marks. / 10 pts
Criterion 4
view longer description 3 to >2.52 pts
High Distinction
Exemplary writing with very high levels of authenticity and independent thought. Ideas are clearly expressed. Introductory sentence used at the start of paragraphs. Main subject matter is developed within each paragraph. Concluding sentence used at the end of paragraphs. Exemplary spelling, grammar and syntax with no errors. Meets all style requirements.
2.52 to >2.22 pts
Distinction
Evidence of superior academic writing skills. Authentic and original writing that clearly synthesises the key points of the assignment. Expression is clear. Correct use of paragraphs. Discussion in each paragraph provides sufficient depth to demonstrate understanding. Superior spelling, grammar and syntax < 5 minor errors. Meets all style requirements.
2.22 to >1.92 pts
Credit
Evidence of sound academic writing. Authentic and original writing that clearly addresses the key points of the assignment. Expression is appropriate. Paragraphs are 5-7 sentences in length and sentences are clear and concise. Minor errors only in syntax, spelling and grammar. Meets all style requirements.
1.92 to >1.47 pts
Pass
Writing that attempts to show independent thought. May struggle with written expression. Attempts to use paragraphs. Some sentences may be too long/short. Meets almost all style requirements including spacing, page numbers, font, headings.
1.47 to >0 pts
Fail
Disorganised and lacks any sense of cohesion or alignment Language hinders the effective flow of ideas and meaning. Sentences lack structure and are consistently too short or too long. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not structured as per requirements in Course Outline. / 3 pts
Criterion 5
view longer description 3 to >2.52 pts
High Distinction
Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. Complies with all the referencing style requirements. There are no errors in referencing throughout.
2.52 to >2.22 pts
Distinction
Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. APA 7 referencing style is consistently accurate. Less than 5 minor referencing errors.
2.22 to >1.92 pts
Credit
Sources are appropriate, mostly contemporary and from a narrow range of journals and databases. Complies with referencing style requirements. Some referencing errors in in-text and/or referencing list (5-7).
1.92 to >1.47 pts
Pass
Sources are mostly relevant however there are too few to demonstrate wide reading. Attempts to use APA 7 style. Some errors in in-text and/or referencing list (8-10).
1.47 to >0 pts
Fail
Sources are inappropriate and/or absent. In-text referencing may be absent and/or reference list and contains major errors (>10). / 3 pts
Total points: 0
