EML102 202390 Written Communication
sAssignment Template
EML102 202390 Written Communication
Assessment 3
Indicate option selected:
Topic choices: (Ensure you draw on peer reviewed journal articles, book chapters or other sources of academic integrityto support your discussion).
Option 1:Discussseveral trauma informed teaching strategies or theories and how these are relevant to teaching in your field.
Option 2: Discussseveralevidence-basedstrategies for developingrelevantlanguage, literacy, and numeracy skills in your professional context. Justify why your chosen strategies will work in your sector of education.
Option 3:Discussthe form that acommunity of practice(Wenger, 1998) might take for educators and trainers in your professional context (whether on-campus or online) and outline the benefits of participating in such a community.
Option 4: Donald Schn wrote that reflective practice is a dialogue of thinking and doing through which I become more skilful" (1987, as cited by Bell & Gillett, 1996, p. 47). Provide a working definition of reflective practice and discuss the value of reflective practice for educators and trainers in your field.
Ensure you have read all of the assessment information in the subject outline, before undertaking this assignment.
Upload your completed Assignment 3 template to EASTS by the due date.
EML102 Assignment 3 template: Annotated Bibliography (30%)
Section 1 details of three chosen sources
Provide three separate sources that you will use as citations when writing your essay response to assignment 4, for each of which you provide:
A complete APA 7 reference
A description of the source
An evaluation of the source why is it useful for you when preparing to answer your chosen essay questionb) and c) above should total approximately 300 words for each of your sources
Source 1
APA reference of source
One or two well-developed paragraph/s of 300 words with topic sentence, description of source, evaluation of source and concluding sentence.
Source 2
APA reference of source
One or two well-developed paragraph/s of 300 words with topic sentence, description of source, evaluation of source and concluding sentence.
Source 3
APA reference of source
One or two well-developed paragraph/s of 300 words with topic sentence, description of source, evaluation of source and concluding sentence.
Section 2 a complete APA 7 reference list of your eight chosen sources
Provide below a complete APA 7 reference list of these eight sources, using APA 7 formatting and ensuring alphabetical order.
Marking Criterion 85-100% 75-84% 65-74% 50-64% 0-49%
25.5+ 22.5-25.3 19.5/22.3 15-19.3 0-14.5
Use plain formal English, apply basic rules of grammar and punctuation with appropriate selection of voice and perspective.
Follows assignment instructionsConsistently written in third person point of view. Written with the reader in mind; writing is tightly focused and well organised with paragraphs focused on concise ideas and written in clear, formal English with a sense of narrative flow.Demonstrates astute and original topic analysis.
Within set word count.
Consistently written in third person point of view.
Follows assignment instructions Writing is well organised, with paragraphs written in clear, formal English with some sense of narrative flow.Demonstrates astute topic analysis.
Within set word count.
Consistently written in third person point of view.
Follows assignment instructionsWriting is well organised. A combination of sentence structures accurately convey meaning.
Paragraphs written in plain, clear, formal English.Demonstrates accurate topic analysis.
Within set word count.
Consistently written from third person point of view.
Follows assignment instructionsMost sentences are grammatically correct, and errors do not impact meaning.Paragraphs have a sense of organisation.
Written in plain language with limited casual expression.Demonstrates topic analysisWithin set word count.
Patch plagiarism. Over-reliance on source material at expense of authorial voice.
Mostly written in third person point of view, sometimes uses first or second point of view/perspectives
Follows assignment instructions Sentences unstructured.
Paragraphs are excessively long, short, or disjointed.Disorganised material.Meaning unclear. Wanders off-topic or fails to address the topic.Use of informal language. Use of language that is too formal.
Significant number of spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors per page.Dot points or lists.
Over/Under word count.
Plagiarism. Over-reliance on source material at expense of authorial voice.
Writes from first or second point of view/perspective.
Fails to follow assignment instructions
Citereferences according to the required conventions or style manual APA7Reference list is consistently complete and accurate, with attention to detail of APA 7th edition formatting requirements and correct citation of all items; URLs or DOIs included.
Paraphrasing is sophisticatedly integrated into text with correct with APA 7 style.Quote is selected to add meaning and is seamlessly integrated into text.
Reference list is complete with attention to detail of APA 7th edition formatting requirements for most items;URLs or DOIs included.Paraphrasing is relevant and displays seamless integration with correct with APA 7 style.Quote is integrated into sentence and logically enhances response.
Reference list is complete, in alphabetical order, and contains only cited items, with good attention to APA 7th edition formatting.
Paraphrasing is used effectively with APA 7 citation.Quote is integrated into sentence. Reference list is complete, and mostly accurate, in alphabetical order, and contains only cited items, demonstrating attention to APA 7th edition formatting.
Good attempt to paraphrase and use a quotation. No reference list.
Reference list has missing or uncited items, missing information, is incorrectly formatted or organised;
not in alphabetical order.
No or inappropriate quote and paraphrasing.Over-use of quoting and paraphrasing.
Demonstrate understanding of selecting sources to support academic writing and identify relevant information in written material.
Strong evidence of wide research/reading.
Source materials suitable, with sophisticated interpretation shown.
Developed evidence of research/reading.
Source materials both suitable, with nuanced interpretation shown.
Developing evidence of research/reading.
Source materials are suitable, with sound interpretation shown.
Limited evidence of research/reading.
Source materials only marginally suitable, and limited interpretation shown.
Lacks evidence of research/reading.
Inappropriate or misinterpreted source materials.
Identify peer-reviewed literature and evaluate the academic quality of broader reference materials.
Effectively and efficiently describes and evaluates relevant peer-reviewed literature and rigorous professional sources, demonstrating attention to the quality of reference materials.
Selects peer-reviewed literature and rigorous professional sources.Describes the sources and evaluates them with both the professional context and topic in mind.
Sources are relevant to both the topic chosen and the professional context. Describes sources accurately.
Attempts to source academic and professional sources to support points. with some relevance to the topic and professional context.
Little evidence of ability to identify peer-reviewed literature, or ability to evaluate the quality of source material.
Marking criteria are approximately evenly weighted; however, plagiarism is heavily penalised.
