Evidence for Practice HLSC122
- Subject Code :
HLSC122
- University :
Australian Catholic University Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
|
ASSESSMENTINFORMATION |
|
|
AssessmentTitle |
RecordedpresentationofePoster |
|
Purpose |
Theoralpresentationenablesstudentstoapplylearningstodemonstrate skills in research techniques. |
|
DueDate& Time |
30thApril2025.1400hrs |
|
Weighting |
35% |
|
Length |
10-minuterecordedpresentation |
|
AssessmentRubric |
AttachedasAppendixAofthisdocument |
|
CanvasResource |
A National Q&A Session will be held during week 6 of the semester. The Q&A session will unpack the assessment task requirements. Students will havetheopportunitytoasktheNationalLICsanyquestionsorclarifications they require. All students are recommended to attend this session. A recording of the National Q&A session will be made available for students. The link will be made available on Canvas. |
|
LOsAssessed |
LO1,LO2andLO4 |
|
Task |
Submita10-minuterecordedpresentationofane-poster,basedonone of the scenarios (Appendix B), following the provided template |
|
Submission |
EmbedyourCanvasStudiovideolinkintheAssessment2submission portal. |
|
Presentation |
Usetheheadingsthatareprovidedonthetemplate. |
|
FORMATTING |
|
|
Fileformat |
Mediafiles, MP4 |
|
Margins |
N/A |
|
Fontandsize |
4860-pointCalibriorArial |
|
Spacing |
- |
|
Paragraph |
- |
|
TitlePage |
Nottobeused |
|
Headings |
Asoutlinedinthetemplate. |
|
Structure |
e-poster |
|
Directquotes |
N/A |
|
Header |
- |
|
Footer |
- |
|
ADMINISTRATION |
|
|
LatePenalties |
Latepenaltieswillbeappliedfrom14:01ontheduedate,incurring5%penalty of the maximum marks available up to a maximum of15%. Assessment tasks received more than three calendar days after the due or extended date will receive feedback but will not be allocated a mark. PenaltyTimeframePenaltyMarksDeducted 014:01 Wednesday to 14:00 5% penalty 5marks Thursday 14:01Thursdayto14:00Friday 10%penalty 10marks 14:01 Friday to 14:00 Saturday 15% penalty 15marks Received after 14:01 Saturday No mark allocated Example: Anassignmentissubmitted12hourslateandisinitiallymarkedat60outof 100.A5%penaltyisapplied (5%of100 is5 marks).Therefore,the student receives 55 out of 100 as a final mark. |
|
ReturnofMarks |
Markswillbegenerallyreturnedinthreeweeks;ifthisisnotachievable,you will be notified via your Canvas discussion forum. |
|
FinalAssignment |
Marksforthefinalassessment HLSC122 willbewithhelduntilaftergrade ratification and grade release. |
AppendixA:MarkingRubric
|
Criteria |
Rating |
Points |
||||
|
ReviewQuestion Thiscriterionassesses the quality and effectiveness of the PICOT/ PICo question in terms of its clarity, precision, and relevance to the research or clinical inquiry. |
15to>12.74PtsHD
Presents a comprehensive review question using the PICOT/ PICo format and demonstrates a clear understanding of each componentanditsrelevance to the clinical inquiry. The question is focused, specific, and likely to generate relevant and meaningful results. |
12.74to >11.24PtsDI Reviewquestionis well formulated and with each componentclearly described and demonstrating a good understanding of PICOT/ PICo. The questionisspecific and likely to yield relevant results. |
11.24to>9.74PtsCR Thereviewquestion is adequately formulated, with most components (PICOT/ PICo) adequately identified and described. The question is reasonably specific and addresses the mainaspectsofthe inquiry. |
9.74to>7.49PtsPA The review question issomewhatunclear or lacks precision in one or more components(PICOT/ PICo). The question maybetoobroador lacks specificity, making it less likely to generate focused results. |
7.49to>0PtsNN Thereviewquestion ispoorlyformulated or missing one or more components (PICOT/ PICo). The question is unclear, too broad, or lacks specificity,makingit unlikelytogenerate meaningful results. OR NoPICOT/PICo questionprovided. |
15 |
|
SearchtermsandSynonyms Create a list of potential search terms or synonyms that correspond to yourreviewquestion, utilising the PICOT components that are applicable |
20to>16.8ptsHD Identifies a comprehensive rangeofkeywordsrelatedto the stated review question and the PICOT or PICo. |
16.8to>14.8ptsDI Identifiesawider rangeofrelevant keywordsrelated to the stated review question and the PICOTor PICo. |
14.8to>13.2ptsCR Identifies adequate keywordsrelatedto the stated review question and the PICOT or PICo. |
13.2to>10.0ptsPA Identifies a limited numberofkeywords relatedtothestated reviewquestionand the PICOT or PICo |
10to>0ptsNN Keywordsidentified wereinappropriate, illogical or not related/incomplete PICOT or PICo elements |
20 |
|
Application of BooleanOperators, Truncation and Wildcard |
15to>12.6ptsHD An insightful and comprehensiveuseof |
12.6to>11.1ptsDI Advanceduseof truncation, |
11.1to>9.9ptsCR Sounduseof truncation, |
9.9to>7.4ptsPA Satisfactoryuseof either/OR |
7.4to>0ptsNN MinimalorIncorrect application of |
15 |
|
Providetwoexamples of the application of Boolean Operators, Truncation and Wildcards for your search terms. |
truncation,abbreviations, wildcards & Boolean operators. |
abbreviations, wildcards & Booleanoperators. |
abbreviations, wildcards&Boolean operators. |
truncation, abbreviations, wildcards&Boolean operators. |
truncation, wildcards OR Booleanoperators. |
|
|
Search StrategyDevelop a search string using appropriate keywords,synonyms, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), truncationsand Wildcards. |
20to>16.8ptsHD Provides a sophisticated search string relevant to the stated review question & demonstrates sophisticated useoftruncation,wildcards& Boolean operators. The identified search strategy is outstanding with no gaps. |
16.8to>14.8ptsDI Comprehensive developmentofan advanced search strategy using truncation, wildcard, and Booleanoperators. The identified search strategy is highly effective withminorgaps. |
14.8to>13.2ptsCR A sound development of an effective search strategy using truncation/wildcard, Boolean operators. Theidentifiedsearch strategy is effective with some gaps. |
13.2to>10ptsPA Asatisfactorysearch stringdemonstrating a basic understanding of a search strategy with many opportunities for improvement. |
10to>0ptsNN A superficial search stringdemonstrating an insufficient understanding and/or limited knowledge of developing a search strategy |
20 |
|
QualityofSearchHistory DocumentationThis criterion evaluatestheoverall quality, clarity, and thoroughness of the documented search history,includingthe search process, strategies, and reflections. |
5to>4.5ptsHD Searchhistoryisexceptionally well-documented. All steps, including databases, search terms, filters, syntax (e.g., Boolean operators), and iterations, are clearly presented. Reflections on adjustments are thoughtful and insightful, showing aclear connection between changes and improvedresults. The documentation is well-organised,logical,and |
4.5to>3.74ptsDI Search history is well-documented with minor omissions or inconsistencies. Most key elements,suchas databases,search terms,andfilters, are included. Reflections are thoughtfulbutlack somedepthor |
3.74to>3ptsCR Documentation is adequate but incomplete, with noticeable gaps in details or key steps of the search process.Reflections are basic and may not fully connect changes to outcomes. Organisation is inconsistent,and |
3to>2.5ptsPA Limited documentation of thesearchprocess, withcritical details missing (e.g., databases, syntax, or filters). Reflections, if present,areminimal or lack reasoning. Organisationispoor, making it difficult to follow,andresults |
2.5to>0ptsNN Search history is poorly documented or absent. Little to no information about the process, strategies,orresults is provided. Reflections are missing, and the documentationlacks organisation and relevance. |
5 |
|
easytofollow,withhighly relevant results. |
detail. Organisation is mostlyclear,and results are relevant. |
results are somewhatrelevant but lack thoroughness. |
aremostly irrelevant. |
|||
|
Clarity ofPresentationVisual and verbal communication, adherencetotime limits, and technical quality(audio/video) |
15to>12.6ptsHD Presentation is clear, engaging, and professional. Facialexpressions,voice,and gestures enhance the message. Visuals are high quality, well-organised, and enhance understanding. Presentation is exactly 10 minutes. High-quality audio and video, with clear voice andcrispvisuals.Well-edited for clarity and flow |
12.6to>11.1ptsDI Presentation is clear and professional. Visualssupportthe message but may lack some engagementor polish. Presentation is within the time limit(10minutes 30 seconds). Good audio and video quality,withminor issues. |
11.1to>9.9ptsCR Presentation is generally clear, but someelementslack engagementor professionalism. Presentation is within time limit (10 minutes1minute), but there are technical issues(e.g., low audio quality, poorvisuals). |
9.9to>7.5ptsPA Presentation lacks clarity or professionalism. Visuals are poor quality.Presentation is under 8 minutesor over 11 minutes. Poor audio/video quality, distractingor hard to follow. |
7.5to>0ptsNN Thepresentersdo not explain the content. Presentation is incoherent and not able to be understood or heard.Presentation is under 6 minutes. OR No recording |
15 |
|
ePosterAppearance |
10to>8.49PtsHD The ePoster is logically laid out,textcanbereadeasilyby the viewer. Excellent use of colour, text and font size throughout, whichmakesthe poster highly engaging. Free from academic errors spelling, grammar, punctuation. |
8.49to>7.49PtsDI The ePoster is mostly logicallylaid out, most text can be read easily bytheviewer.Very gooduseofcolour, text and font size throughout, which makes the poster engaging. One academicerror |
7.49to>6.49PtsCR The ePoster is mostly logically laid out, some errors noted(1-2),textcan be mostly read easilybytheviewer. Good use of colour, text and font size throughout, which makes the poster generallyengaging. |
6.49to>4.9PtsPA The ePoster is somewhatclearand logically laid out, some errors noted (3-4), text can be read easily by the viewer. Mostly appropriate use of colour,textandfont size throughout. Textismostly |
4.9to>0.0PtsNN The ePoster is not clear and logically laid out, several parts of the text cannot be read easilybytheviewer. Inappropriateuseof colour and font size throughout. The poster is not engaging.Numerous |
10 |
|
presentspelling, grammar, punctuation. |
Betweentwoand three academic errors spelling, grammar, punctuation. |
appropriate throughout, but there may be some inconsistencieswhich reduces engagementslightly. More than three academic errors spelling, grammar, punctuation. |
academic errors making the content difficulttodecipher- spelling, grammar, punctuation.
OR
NoePoster submitted |
Clinical Scenario1:
A wound care clinic receives patients with chronic, non-healing ulcers, such as venous ulcers, pressure ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers. Healthcare providers at the clinic areevaluatingtheuseofmaggottherapytopromotewoundhealing.Theclinicplanstoapplysterilelarvaetothewoundstoassistwithdebridementandacceleratetissue regeneration. The aim is to assess the effectiveness of maggot therapy in reducing wound size, enhancing tissue healing, andimproving overall recovery time compared to traditional wound care methods.
ClinicalScenario2:
YouarelookingafterMr.Briggs,whohasarthritis,andyounotice thathisinflammatorymarkers,suchasCRP,areelevated. Afterreadingasocialmediapostaboutthe potential benefits of turmeric/curcumin supplementation for improving inflammatory and oxidative status, you are considering whether this intervention could help reduce his inflammation. You plan to explore the use of turmeric/curcumin supplementation to see if it can lower his inflammatory markers and improve his overall condition.
ClinicalScenario3:
In a surgical ward, healthcare providers are investigating the effects of an early mobilisation protocol for postoperative patients. The hospital intends to introduce early mobilisation strategies, including early ambulation or gentle exercises, and compare the results with standard postoperative care. The aim is to determine if early mobilisation helps reduce the risk of complications and shortens the length of hospital stays within the first 72 hours after surgery.
ClinicalScenario4:
Asastudentmidwifeinanantenatalclinic, youmeetRachel, whois12weekspregnant.Duringyourappointment, Rachel asksaboutmidwifery-ledcareanditsbenefits for her pregnancy. Interested in providing her with evidence-based information, you decide to review the literature on the effectiveness of midwifery-led care. You aim to explore how this model may improve pregnancy outcomes, such as reducing the rate of cesarean sections, enhancing maternal satisfaction, and promoting better neonatal health.
ClinicalScenario5:
James, a 60-year-old man, has had a major surgery and is now in the ICU. Because hes having trouble breathing, he needs to be puton a ventilator (machine that helps him breathe). The doctors know that people who are on a ventilator for a long time are at risk of getting a lung infection called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). They are considering using a special type of breathing tube, called a silver-coated endotracheal tube (ETT), because the silver in it may help prevent infections. The medicalteamwantstoknowifusingsilver-coatedETTscanhelpstop VAPcomparedto regulartubesforpatientslikeJameswhoneedaventilatorfor24 hoursor more.
ClinicalScenario6:
You are a nurse working in the High Dependency Unit at a new hospital. Youve noticed that the protocols for flushing central venous catheters (CVC) to keep them open and functioning are different here than at your previous hospital. In your previous hospital, heparin was used to flush the catheters, but at this hospital, normal saline isthe preferred option. Youre curious to find out if there is a difference in the effectiveness of heparin versus normal saline in maintaining the patency of CVCs in adult patients. You want to compare these two methods to see which one is more effective at keeping the catheters open.
ClinicalScenario7:
You are a nurse working in a wound care clinic that treats patients with foot ulcers caused by diabetes. One of your patients, Mr. Johnson, has had a foot wound that wontheal, evenafterusingregulardressings.Youveheardthathoneydressingsmighthelpheal thesetypesofwoundsbecausehoneyhasnaturalpropertiesthat fight infection and promote healing. You want to find out if honey dressings work better than regular dressings inhelping diabetic foot wounds heal.
ClinicalScenario8:
Sarah,anurseworkinginasurgicalward,iscaringforpatientsrecoveringfromsurgery.Shenoticesthatsomepatientsareusingpatient-controlledanalgesia(PCA)pumps, while others are receiving traditional nurse-administered analgesia. Sarah wonders if PCA provides better pain relief and increases patient satisfaction compared to traditional methods. She chooses to explore the impact of PCA on managing post-operative pain and enhancing patient experiences.
ClinicalScenario9:
Emma, a nurseworking in aresidential aged care facility, cares for residents with dementia whooften exhibitbehavioural and psychological symptoms such as agitation, anxiety,andrestlessness.Shehasheardaboutdolltherapybeingusedasanon-pharmacologicalinterventiontohelpmanagethesesymptoms.Emmawantstounderstand whether introducing doll therapy could have an impact on the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in her residents compared to standard care.
ClinicalScenario10:
Sarah is a 30-year-old female who has been experiencing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Over the past six months, she has had three UTIs, resulting in significant discomfort and frequent antibiotic use. Concerned about the side effects of antibiotics and seeking alternative preventive measures, Sarah learns from a friend that cranberry juice may help reduce the incidence of UTIs. She is interested in understanding how effective cranberry products are in preventing UTIs.
