High Distinction

Criterion

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Purpose/Introduction

Clearly introduces/states the purpose of the briefing paper and the vulnerable population group

5 marks (8%)

Exceptional statement of the briefing purpose, clearly identifies the purpose of the briefing and the vulnerable population of interest

Excellent statement of the briefing purpose, clearly identifies the purpose of the briefing and the vulnerable population of interest

Good statement of the briefing purpose, clearly identifies the purpose of the briefing and the vulnerable population of interest

Adequate statement of the briefing purpose, identifies the purpose of the briefing and the vulnerable population of interest. More clarity required.

Inadequate or no statement of the briefing purpose, and/or does not identify the vulnerable population of interest.

Main body of the briefing paper

Comprehensive, logical, appropriate and informative.

Demonstrated planning,

understanding and engagement with the key concepts learnt in the unit: PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

30 marks (50%)

Outstanding briefing that is comprehensive, logical and appropriate.

Demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Very good briefing that is comprehensive, logical and appropriate.

Demonstrates an excellent

understanding of the PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Good briefing that is reasonably comprehensive, logical and appropriate.

Demonstrates a good

understanding of the PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Adequate briefing that is partially comprehensive, logical and appropriate.

Demonstrates an adequate

understanding of the PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Inadequate briefing that does not reads as comprehensive, logical and appropriate.

Fails to demonstrate an

understanding of the PHC principles; the role/s of PHC nurses; knowledge & skills to support vulnerable groups in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Criterion

Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail

Discussion of cultural safety for the selected vulnerable group

Inclusion of cultural safety principles, with demonstrated

understanding and clear links to context of the vulnerable population group of interest

10 marks (18%)

Outstanding discussion of cultural safety, demonstrating an advanced understanding of the principles.

Linked clearly and explicitly to the vulnerable group of interest

Very good discussion of cultural safety, demonstrating a good understanding of the principles.

Linked clearly to the vulnerable group of interest

Good discussion of cultural safety, demonstrates an understanding of the principles.

Linked well in to the vulnerable group of interest

Satisfactory discussion of cultural safety, demonstrates some understanding of the principles.

Linked partially to the vulnerable group of interest

Limited or no discussion of cultural safety, demonstrates minimal or no understanding of the principles.

Fails to link to the vulnerable group of interest

Conclusion/Recommendations

Clear concise conclusion:

Clarifies and summarises the briefing, leaving the reader with a clear take away message/s and (where appropriate) practice recommendations

5 marks (8%)

Exceptional conclusion that is clear, concise and

clarifies and summarises

the briefing key points. Presents the take away messages expertly.

No new information

included in conclusion.

Very good conclusion that is clear, concise and

clarifies and summarises

the briefing key points. Presents the take away messages very well.

No new information

included in conclusion.

Good conclusion that attempts to clarify and summarises the briefing key points. Presents the majority of the key points well.

.

No new information

included in conclusion.

Satisfactory conclusion. Could be improved in terms of clarity and summarising the briefing key points. Presents some of the key points

.

Unsatisfactory or no

conclusion that does

not clarify or summarise

the briefing key points

Criterion

Distinction

Distinction Credit Pass Fail

Evidence

Used a wide range of quality sources

Referencing follows APA 7th Edition guidelines

5 marks (8%)

An outstanding and

comprehensive range of resources used. Correctly cited.

All resources from reputable sources and

published within 7 years (unless seminal piece of work). Excellent range of resources used. Correctly cited.

Majority of resources sourced from reputable sources and the majority of resources

published within 7 years (unless seminal piece of work). Good range of resources used. Mostly correctly cited.

At least half of the resources used were from reputable

sources. Some resources

published within 7 years (unless seminal

piece of work). Satisfactory range of resources used. A number of errors with referencing.

Some resources used were from reputable sources. Some resources published within 7 years (unless

seminal piece of work). Insufficient or no resources used. Many errors with referencing.

One or more unauthorised

websites (i.e. Wikipedia).

Limited references published within 7 years (unless seminal piece of work).

Presentation

Logical and clear.

Demonstrates

excellence in academic writing - no grammatical or spelling errors

Adheres to assignment guidelines for

Formatting.

Within prescribed word limit

5 marks (8%)

Exceptional presentation that demonstrated

excellent scholarly writing.

Well structured. No errors.

Adheres to assignment

guidelines. Excellent presentation that

demonstrated very good scholarly writing.

Well structured. Good attention to spelling and grammar

For the most part, adheres to assignment guidelines. Good presentation that demonstrated for the most part good scholarly writing.

Structure is clear. Shown to spelling and grammar

Minor errors in adhering to assignment

guidelines.

Satisfactory presentation.

Writing style could be improved.

Structure could be improved. Some spelling and grammatical errors

Some errors in adhering to assignment guidelines.

Poor writing style with errors in expression, sentence structure, paragraph structure, grammar and spelling.

Did not adhere to assignment guidelines.