High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail (minor and major fail criteria)
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail (minor and major fail criteria)
Discuss the clinical effectiveness of the health technology.
(500 words) The student has provided an excellent explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster.
Excellent description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster.
Excellent choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness.
The student has provided a very good explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster.
Very good description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster.
Very good choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness.
The student has provided a good explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster.
Good description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster.
Good choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness.
The student has provided a superficial explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster.
Shallow description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster.
The choice of evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness is somewhat relevant.
The student has failed to explain how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster.
Little to no description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster.
Irrelevant or inaccurate choice of evidence regarding if the health technology effectiveness.
Is the chosen health technology safe?
(200 words) Excellent description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology.
Very good description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology.
Good description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology.
Superficial description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology.
Concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology are missing or inaccurate.
Other consideration about the health technology
(200 words) Excellent description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. Very good description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. Good description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. Basic description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. Missing or inaccurate description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology.
Writing Style/Grammar
Grammar, spelling, punctuation
Coherency
Clear, coherent writing style with an excellent structured, easy to follow essay. Outstanding attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Clear, coherent style with a very good structure.
Comprehensive attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Only a very few errors. Good style with a reasonable structure Competent attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. A few grammatical errors. Fairly well written however needed more attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Grammatical errors. Poor style. Pattern of ungrammatical writing Confused structure.
Little attention to spelling and punctuation. Errors.
Referencing sources (number and quality) and reference list
APA 7th only
Alphabetical order in reference list
All in-text citations follow required style. Excellent sources
Correct reference list. The majority of in-text citations follow required style. Comprehensive sources
Near correct reference list. Most in-text citations follow required style. Good sources
Generally correct reference list. Some in-text citations follow required style.
Adequate resources
Reference list contains errors In-text citations do not follow required style.
Poor or missing sources
Reference list is incomplete or missing.