diff_months: 11

Literature Review on Contemporary Human Resource Management Topics HRM3004

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2024-11-26 21:00:40
Order Code:
Question Task Id: 485280


Description


Write a 2,000-word (+- 10%) literature review of human resource management (HRM) on a contemporary HRM topic, and report on its implication for business practice.


Through this assignment, you will develop fundamental knowledge and skills required for HR practice, including:


researching and collating/organising information effectively


gathering and evaluation data sets


reviewing the potentialimpacts ofcontemporaryHRM issuesfor business practices


presenting findings in a clear and logical order


contextualising academic research and connecting it with what actually happens (practically) in organisations/the field.


Submission guidelines


Submit a Microsoft Word document (not PDF) file as a file upload in Canvas via the 'Start assignment' button at the bottom of the current page. This will automatically submit via Turnitin.


Please format as per APA7 guidelines, namely size 12-point font and double line spacing.


Assessment policies


Click on the button below for information onAcademic integrity


Academic Integrity


Click on the button below for ECU's policy onlate submissions


Late Submission Policy


Click on the button below for ECU's policy onExtensionsand the link to submit your application for an extension.


Extensions Policy


Assessment Q&A


Click on the button below to ask any questions relating to this assessment.


Assessment Q&A

SAVING THIS PAGE FOR OFFLINE VIEWING

To save this (or any) page for offline viewing, follow the steps depending on the device you are using. Remember to always use the latest version of eitherChromeorFirefoxbrowsers when accessing your unit.

Using a Windows PC or Mac to save a page for offline viewing

Using an iPhone or iPad to save a page for offline viewing

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE

What is this assessment about?

In this assessment you are required to complete an academic literature review. But what exactly does it mean to review literature?

You might have heard about annotated bibliographies, whichis a list of four to five articles, eachincludingacorrectly formatted academic referenceand a 250-word summary of an articles key points.All articles are distinct from each other and are not explicitly put into relation to each other. In aliterature review, however, you look at the articles in comparison with the objective to discern different perspectives, viewpoints, and correlating or opposing arguments and approaches to a specific topic. You can view it as a conversation or a story that you are establishing by choosing and relating sources to each other.

A literature review is an integral part of academic work and sets the foundation and context for the research. It shows what research has already been done in the field, so that you know where more research and discussion might be needed.

The library has a very informative tip sheet on literature reviews that you can accesshere. It says that in a literature review, your central focus is examining and evaluating what has been said before on a topic and establishing the relevance of this information to your own research (ECU, 2008, p. 1). The main point is that you are interested in the topic you choose as the anchor point of your research. Finding relevant literature is fun.

The challenging part is to decide which sources to include and which to leave out. We recommend that you choose sources that have been published since 2010, are relevant for your topic, have been peer-reviewed and published in an academic journal and contribute valuable knowledge to the field of research.

Over the next couple of weeks, this subject will provide you with opportunities to develop your literature review skills, so that you are all set to submit your assignment in Week 5.

You might wonder why writing a literature review is important, given that becoming a researcher is not what you aspire towards.Have a look at this image:

Source: de Wolf, S. (2019). This researcher created cartoons to make science more popular.Erasmus Magazine.https://www.erasmusmagazine.nl/en/2019/10/15/this-researcher-created-cartoons-to-make-science-more-popular/

What is the message behind this brief story? If you think the message is that research is fundamental for the success of businesses and enterprises in various industries, then you are on the right track. As a professional, but also in your personal life, we are so often required to look for information, to evaluate and assess sources in terms of their validity and reliability and to take responsibility if things go wrong due to us not having done our research thoroughly enough. The farmer in the cartoon above relied on one source only the wrong one. What if he had researched more widely and come across a more diverse conversation that would have pointed out that the product he had chosen was not the right one?

The skill to research and find reliable sources and to read, understand, assess, evaluate and place them into the context of a larger discourse (discourse is a fancy word for conversation) applies as much to human resource management as to academia. In your future HR profession, you will need to research, collate, and organise information, gather and evaluate data sets and effectively present and communicate your findings. All of this is the main focus of writing a literature review. And, as a cherry on top, you get to read many interesting current perspectives on HRM, which will increase your knowledge base in regard to the nature of HRM and prepare you for work in the field.

When you prepare your literature review, you look at the potential impacts of contemporary HRM issues for business practice. This assessment helps you to develop the skills needed and to write through a business lens by looking what happens (practically) in organisations.

INSTRUCTIONS

Now, lets look at the specifics of the assessment task:

What am I required to do?

Overall:Provide your individual academic understanding ofaselected topicand its implications for HRMand business strategy.

To do so, conduct independent research for your literature review and use at leasttwelve (12)scholarly peer-reviewed articles (published since the year 2010).

The literature review should identify key themes and issues and have a clear, logical structure.

Step 1:Read all assessment materials provided on Canvas. Please refer to the marking rubric for this assessment to see marking criteria and achievement expectations. Highlight everything you dont understand. If you have any assessment-related questions, pop them into the Assessment Q&A discussion board, and your facilitator will respond.

Step2:Choose oneof the following topics for your literature review:



  1. Generation Z
  2. Psychological well-being
  3. Flexible work practices
  4. Expatriation
  5. Talent management
  6. Gender diversity
  7. Gig economy
  8. Green human resource management
  9. Artificial intelligence
  10. Other topics can be selected in consultation with your lecturer



Step 3:Have a look at theECU literature review academic tip sheet.

Step4:Nowstart your research into your topic. You can find tips on how to conduct research here:https://ecu.au.libguides.com/business-resourcesLinks to an external site.

Step 5:Read your articles closely and make yourself more familiar with their content. Take notes while reading and ask yourself, for example, what is the purpose of the article? What is the literature about? What are the key findings reported in the article?

Step6:Follow the template below to complete your assessment.The following is a suggested literature review format:



  • A title page: Includes title of literature review

  • Abstract(not included in word count):This should contain the aim of the literature review a brief background summary, brief details of the investigation or research you have undertaken, the major findings or key issues arising, and any recommendations if these are appropriate.

  • An introduction(200 words +/- 10%): In a literature review your introduction needs to identify the purpose of the research and theselected topic. This section should also set the scene by discussing the significance of the area under investigation and map out the remainder of the literature review for the reader.

  • The main body (1,600 words +/- 10%)should include relevant headings and sub-headings identifying the key themes, issues and discussion of the selected topic. Headings should be kept simple, and the content should be able to be read without these. Your literature review shouldbe referenced to supportyour arguments and analysis.

  • A conclusion(200 words+/- 10%):This section should be written in your words and must pull together the key points you have discussed and identify future directions (i.e.where to from here). It should not introduce new material.

  • A reference list(not included in word count): APA 7th edition



How long should my review be?

Word countis2,000 words (plus or minus 10%), excluding abstract, table of content and reference list.

Which referencing style do I use?

APA 7thedition is the required referencing style.Check here for more information:https://www.ecu.edu.au/centres/library-services/how-to-guides/referencing

All references cited in the body of your paper should be listed in full at the end of the assessment. You should not have any source material in your reference list which is not included within the text of the assessment. Valuable marks are thrown away by not taking enough care with referencing.

REQUIREMENTS

Prescribed textbook and exclusively scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles (since the year 2010) must be cited.

Please note, while your textbook is a useful starting point for this assignment, it is expected that you will consult a wider variety of academic sources and conduct significant research prior to writing the review.

PREPARATION ACTIVITIES

Throughout unit - Assessment practice corners: Writing a literature review

LEARNING OUTCOMES



  • apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate judgement and problem solving of contemporary HRM issues

  • formulate strategies for effective HRM in relation to recruitment and retention, learning and development, compensation and performance management

  • appraise literature and theories on selected HRM topics and issues

  • evaluate the contribution that effective HRM can make to organisational objectives.



MARKING CRITERIA



  • Content and analysis (50 marks)

  • Organisation (20 marks)

  • Reference quality and skills (10 marks)

  • Mechanics and length (20 marks)



FEEDBACK

Feedback will be available 7 working days after the deadline. Find instructions on how to view feedback from your facilitator after your assessment has been graded here:

https://courses.ecu.edu.au/courses/8492/pages/canvas-grades-and-feedback

Rubric

Assignment 2: Literature review


Assignment 2: Literature review


Criteria


Ratings


Pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeContent and analysis



50to >39.9Pts


High distinction (HD) (80-100%)


Literature review contains a carefully balanced selection of material that reveals sophisticated understanding of content. A well-grounded analysis supports the central argument.


39.9to >34.9Pts


Distinction (D) (70-79%)


Literature review reveals clear understanding of content as evidenced by in-depth analysis that supports the central argument.


34.9to >29.9Pts


Credit (C) (60-69%)


Literature review reveals clear understanding of content as evidenced by good analysis.


29.9to >24.9Pts


Pass (P) (50-59%)


Literature review reveals simple understanding of content. Reader can be misled or confused by vague analysis at times.


24.9to >0Pts


Fail (N) (0-49%)


Literature review reveals limited understanding of content, as evidenced by poor analysis.


50pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOrganisation



20to >15.9Pts


High Distinction (HD) (80-100%)


Writing orders and fully develops many complex ideas. The overall structure is finely balanced and cohesive.


15.9to >13.9Pts


Distinction (D) (70-79%)


Writing orders and develops many complex ideas. The overall structure is well-balanced and cohesive.


13.9to >11.9Pts


Credit (C) (60-69%)


Writing is logically sequenced and smooth. The overall structure is balanced and cohesive.


11.9to >9.9Pts


Pass (P) (50-59%)


Writing is mostly logically sequenced and smooth with some sections still requiring further development. The overall structure is apparent but sometimes appears disjointed.


9.9to >0Pts


Fail (N) (0-49%)


Writing is not logically sequenced and/or is disjointed. The overall structure is not readily apparent and/or is loosely assembled.


20pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReference quality and skills



10to >7.9Pts


High Distinction (HD) (80-100%)


Referencing skill is excellent as APA citation style (in-text and end-text) is fully, properly and consistently used throughout the report. No errors present.


7.9to >6.9Pts


Distinction (D) (70-79%)


Referencing skill is well-developed as the APA citation style (in-text and end-text) is used properly. Errors are rare.


6.9to >5.9Pts


Credit (C) (60-69%)


Referencing skill is good as the APA citation style (in-text and end-text) is used with ease. A few noticeable errors hinder quality.


5.9to >4.9Pts


Pass (P) (50-59%)


Referencing skill is emerging, and still requires practice as the APA citation style (in-text and end-text) is followed in an inconsistent way.


4.9to >0Pts


Fail (N) (0-49%)


Referencing skill requires immediate attention. The APA citation style (in-text and end-text) is not followed or is poorly deployed with too many errors and inconsistencies.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeMechanics and length



20to >15.9Pts


High Distinction (HD) (80-100%)


Sentences are sophisticated and error free. Paper adheres to length guidelines.


15.9to >13.9Pts


Distinction (D) (70-79%)


Sentences are well-constructed and effective. Occasional errors in punctuation, spelling and/or grammar. Paper adheres to length guidelines.


13.9to >11.9Pts


Credit (C) (60-69%)


Sentences are easily understood and correct, with relatively infrequent errors in spelling, punctuation and/or grammar that do not significantly hinder readers understanding. Paper adheres to length guidelines.


11.9to >9.9Pts


Pass (P) (50-59%)


Sentences are mostly clear, however frequent errors in use of conventions of written English (e.g. punctuation, spelling, grammar mistakes) hinders the readers understanding at times. Paper adheres to length guidelines.


9.9to >0Pts


Fail (N) (0-49%)


Sentences are difficult to understand because of poor use of conventions of written English (e.g. frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling that regularly interfere with understanding). Paper does not adhere to length guidelines.


20pts


Total points:100

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : November 26th, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 171

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more